Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
33 Posts 21 Posters 62 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

    So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

    Mozilla: Opposed
    WebKit: Opposed
    Microsoft: Several concerns
    W3C TAG: Several concerns
    Developers: Mostly negative

    Chrome: Ships anyway.

    A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

    clutch_lever@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    clutch_lever@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    clutch_lever@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @jaffathecake I've been saying chrome is the new ie for years...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ joshhunt@hachyderm.io

      @jaffathecake Maybe there's some definition of "developers" in the spec process, but I think it is problematic to consider "developers" to be one giant mass.

      I agree with you - this is a bad API. But especially given the topic, I think this process self-selects for the most vocal, and I can imagine there are loads of developers out there that are genuinely supportive of an API like this.

      jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jaffathecake@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      @joshhunt if there is then they failed to show it. They posted a couple of links, including a survey about something else.

      oblomov@sociale.networkO 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

        So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

        Mozilla: Opposed
        WebKit: Opposed
        Microsoft: Several concerns
        W3C TAG: Several concerns
        Developers: Mostly negative

        Chrome: Ships anyway.

        A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

        bit@ohai.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bit@ohai.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bit@ohai.social
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @jaffathecake

        Alternatives are available.
        https://www.firefox.com

        thestonedonkey@beige.partyT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • bit@ohai.socialB bit@ohai.social

          @jaffathecake

          Alternatives are available.
          https://www.firefox.com

          thestonedonkey@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
          thestonedonkey@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
          thestonedonkey@beige.party
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @bit I switched to it last year and not had any issues.  It's a great alternative if your tired of all the nonsense Chrome keeps rolling out.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

            @jaffathecake
            Google / Alphabet needs to have Android & Chrome divested from them and them kicked out of everything.

            They are an Advertising agency that cares nothing about local laws or people.
            Somel finance from Eric Schmidt, who was CEO for a while. Hides from public eye and hardly mentioned in history of Google. He turned it into an advertising agency fuelled by surveillance.
            Google Analytics and Recaptcha are evil tools they use that no-one should deploy, or any other Google service.

            raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
            raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
            raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @jaffathecake
            Amazon, Google, Apple, Musk etc show the huge flaw in allowing shares as collateral for loans as "payment" for a takeover, often described as a merger.

            Obscene Capitalism.

            Link Preview Image
            List of mergers and acquisitions by Amazon - Wikipedia

            favicon

            (en.wikipedia.org)

            Link Preview Image
            List of mergers and acquisitions by Alphabet - Wikipedia

            favicon

            (en.wikipedia.org)

            Link Preview Image
            List of mergers and acquisitions by Apple - Wikipedia

            favicon

            (en.wikipedia.org)

            Musk is rich by background, luck & stupidity of other people, partly Peter Thiel.

            Link Preview Image
            Business career of Elon Musk - Wikipedia

            favicon

            (en.wikipedia.org)

            Paid Tesla to claim he was a founder.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

              So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

              Mozilla: Opposed
              WebKit: Opposed
              Microsoft: Several concerns
              W3C TAG: Several concerns
              Developers: Mostly negative

              Chrome: Ships anyway.

              A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

              lemgandi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lemgandi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lemgandi@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @jaffathecake Internal politics trumps external reactions every time.

              I am currently using waterfox, a Clean fork of Firefox ( no AI features, kill switch or no )

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • phl@mastodon.socialP phl@mastodon.social

                @jaffathecake @nachtfunke I loved that one when I read it the other day 😄 The strongly supportive was one comment in a github issue, a blog that doesn't exist anymore, and another blog post. Overwhelming interest, overwhelming support! 😄

                thecatburgler@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                thecatburgler@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                thecatburgler@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @phl @jaffathecake @nachtfunke

                Ya know they say threes a crowd 😅

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

                  So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

                  Mozilla: Opposed
                  WebKit: Opposed
                  Microsoft: Several concerns
                  W3C TAG: Several concerns
                  Developers: Mostly negative

                  Chrome: Ships anyway.

                  A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  @jaffathecake

                  Given the other shit that Google is shipping the moment, their browser won't be going onto any system that doesn't absolutely need it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

                    So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

                    Mozilla: Opposed
                    WebKit: Opposed
                    Microsoft: Several concerns
                    W3C TAG: Several concerns
                    Developers: Mostly negative

                    Chrome: Ships anyway.

                    A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

                    thecatburgler@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    thecatburgler@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    thecatburgler@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @jaffathecake

                    Google is on the boycott list.
                    They’re too big for anyone’s good & are tied in with the two governments that care more about big brother surveillance and holy wars than their people.

                    I like ecosia (they plant trees for each search)
                    Brave and Firefox are cool too

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • nachtfunke@indieweb.socialN nachtfunke@indieweb.social

                      @jaffathecake what are we as developers supposed to do here? We have literally no say in this whatsoever.

                      It’s a genuine question, what are we supposed to? Because I subjectively feel like we could have done something maybe 10 years ago, but now…?

                      ragectl@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ragectl@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ragectl@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @nachtfunke @jaffathecake oh that's easy developers needed to keep using and supporting Firefox because open internet matters more than anything else.

                      Sadly, majority of developers failed at that, just like they did with Internet Exploder.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

                        So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

                        Mozilla: Opposed
                        WebKit: Opposed
                        Microsoft: Several concerns
                        W3C TAG: Several concerns
                        Developers: Mostly negative

                        Chrome: Ships anyway.

                        A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

                        yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                        yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                        yoasif@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @jaffathecake Sounds kind of like how #Mozilla pushed ahead with #AI even after your lying polls about the provenance of training data in translations and the multitude of negative comments here and on Mozilla Connect.

                        Pretty good blind spot for Mozilla - you can only tell when things are bad when your competitors do it.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Firefox’s AI Kill Switch is a Trap: How Mozilla Made AI Your Problem

                        TL;DR: Mozilla recently released AI controls for Firefox: a singlecontrol panel that lets people disable AI features in the browser or pick andchoose which t...

                        favicon

                        Youssuff Quips (www.quippd.com)

                        platymew@layer8.spaceP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

                          So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

                          Mozilla: Opposed
                          WebKit: Opposed
                          Microsoft: Several concerns
                          W3C TAG: Several concerns
                          Developers: Mostly negative

                          Chrome: Ships anyway.

                          A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

                          maikel@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                          maikel@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                          maikel@vmst.io
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @jaffathecake internet explorer from its grave.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

                            @joshhunt if there is then they failed to show it. They posted a couple of links, including a survey about something else.

                            oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oblomov@sociale.network
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            @jaffathecake @joshhunt it's like the XSLT situation in reverse

                            Google: we want to drop XSLT support

                            web developers: we really want you to keep XSLT and possibly upgrade support for v3 of the standard so we can use it with JSON too

                            Google: OK, we've listened to everybody's opinion and nobody wants XSLT so we're dropping it.

                            oblomov@sociale.networkO 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • oblomov@sociale.networkO oblomov@sociale.network

                              @jaffathecake @joshhunt it's like the XSLT situation in reverse

                              Google: we want to drop XSLT support

                              web developers: we really want you to keep XSLT and possibly upgrade support for v3 of the standard so we can use it with JSON too

                              Google: OK, we've listened to everybody's opinion and nobody wants XSLT so we're dropping it.

                              oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                              oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                              oblomov@sociale.network
                              wrote last edited by
                              #27

                              @jaffathecake @joshhunt

                              (and obviously Mozilla follows suit, because why are they there if not to suck up to the bully)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • yoasif@mastodon.socialY yoasif@mastodon.social

                                @jaffathecake Sounds kind of like how #Mozilla pushed ahead with #AI even after your lying polls about the provenance of training data in translations and the multitude of negative comments here and on Mozilla Connect.

                                Pretty good blind spot for Mozilla - you can only tell when things are bad when your competitors do it.

                                Link Preview Image
                                Firefox’s AI Kill Switch is a Trap: How Mozilla Made AI Your Problem

                                TL;DR: Mozilla recently released AI controls for Firefox: a singlecontrol panel that lets people disable AI features in the browser or pick andchoose which t...

                                favicon

                                Youssuff Quips (www.quippd.com)

                                platymew@layer8.spaceP This user is from outside of this forum
                                platymew@layer8.spaceP This user is from outside of this forum
                                platymew@layer8.space
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                @yoasif @jaffathecake If the word ends in an s-like phoneme, you're supposed to eschew the s after the apostrophe.

                                E.g. For Fox' sake! 😉

                                yoasif@mastodon.socialY 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • platymew@layer8.spaceP platymew@layer8.space

                                  @yoasif @jaffathecake If the word ends in an s-like phoneme, you're supposed to eschew the s after the apostrophe.

                                  E.g. For Fox' sake! 😉

                                  yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                  yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                  yoasif@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #29

                                  @platymew @jaffathecake MLA and Chicago Manual of Style agree with what I did, at least: https://grammarist.com/punctuation/apostrophe-after-s-rules-and-examples/

                                  platymew@layer8.spaceP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

                                    So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

                                    Mozilla: Opposed
                                    WebKit: Opposed
                                    Microsoft: Several concerns
                                    W3C TAG: Several concerns
                                    Developers: Mostly negative

                                    Chrome: Ships anyway.

                                    A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

                                    schouten_b@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    schouten_b@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    schouten_b@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #30

                                    @jaffathecake There's a serious question to be asked about whether an engine shipping things which the broader standards community is opposed to can still be considered a standards compliant browser.

                                    yoasif@mastodon.socialY 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • yoasif@mastodon.socialY yoasif@mastodon.social

                                      @platymew @jaffathecake MLA and Chicago Manual of Style agree with what I did, at least: https://grammarist.com/punctuation/apostrophe-after-s-rules-and-examples/

                                      platymew@layer8.spaceP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      platymew@layer8.spaceP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      platymew@layer8.space
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #31

                                      @yoasif @jaffathecake Ah, yes, the Bri'ish vs. 'murrican vs. Internet rules of englishing. 🖖😅👍

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • schouten_b@mastodon.socialS schouten_b@mastodon.social

                                        @jaffathecake There's a serious question to be asked about whether an engine shipping things which the broader standards community is opposed to can still be considered a standards compliant browser.

                                        yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                        yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                        yoasif@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #32

                                        @Schouten_B @jaffathecake Hasn't that happened before? Who else supported PNaCl?

                                        I think that is kind of an academic question too, unfortunately - most developers seem to care less about whether something is a standard, and more about whether their userbase can access the feature.

                                        schouten_b@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • yoasif@mastodon.socialY yoasif@mastodon.social

                                          @Schouten_B @jaffathecake Hasn't that happened before? Who else supported PNaCl?

                                          I think that is kind of an academic question too, unfortunately - most developers seem to care less about whether something is a standard, and more about whether their userbase can access the feature.

                                          schouten_b@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          schouten_b@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          schouten_b@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #33

                                          @yoasif @jaffathecake Sure, I think the PNaCl objections were of a different, less fundamental nature, but yeah, this is a question I've asked myself more often.

                                          And sure, humans fundamentally look out for number 1 first. You're not wrong, but some do care about standards, I've been considering blocking Chrome on my own sites. Since they aren't commercial anyway and I don't care if people won't switch browsers in order to access them 🙂.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups