Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
33 Posts 21 Posters 62 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

    So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

    Mozilla: Opposed
    WebKit: Opposed
    Microsoft: Several concerns
    W3C TAG: Several concerns
    Developers: Mostly negative

    Chrome: Ships anyway.

    A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

    thecatburgler@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    thecatburgler@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    thecatburgler@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #22

    @jaffathecake

    Google is on the boycott list.
    They’re too big for anyone’s good & are tied in with the two governments that care more about big brother surveillance and holy wars than their people.

    I like ecosia (they plant trees for each search)
    Brave and Firefox are cool too

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nachtfunke@indieweb.socialN nachtfunke@indieweb.social

      @jaffathecake what are we as developers supposed to do here? We have literally no say in this whatsoever.

      It’s a genuine question, what are we supposed to? Because I subjectively feel like we could have done something maybe 10 years ago, but now…?

      ragectl@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
      ragectl@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
      ragectl@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #23

      @nachtfunke @jaffathecake oh that's easy developers needed to keep using and supporting Firefox because open internet matters more than anything else.

      Sadly, majority of developers failed at that, just like they did with Internet Exploder.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

        So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

        Mozilla: Opposed
        WebKit: Opposed
        Microsoft: Several concerns
        W3C TAG: Several concerns
        Developers: Mostly negative

        Chrome: Ships anyway.

        A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

        yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
        yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
        yoasif@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #24

        @jaffathecake Sounds kind of like how #Mozilla pushed ahead with #AI even after your lying polls about the provenance of training data in translations and the multitude of negative comments here and on Mozilla Connect.

        Pretty good blind spot for Mozilla - you can only tell when things are bad when your competitors do it.

        Link Preview Image
        Firefox’s AI Kill Switch is a Trap: How Mozilla Made AI Your Problem

        TL;DR: Mozilla recently released AI controls for Firefox: a singlecontrol panel that lets people disable AI features in the browser or pick andchoose which t...

        favicon

        Youssuff Quips (www.quippd.com)

        platymew@layer8.spaceP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

          So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

          Mozilla: Opposed
          WebKit: Opposed
          Microsoft: Several concerns
          W3C TAG: Several concerns
          Developers: Mostly negative

          Chrome: Ships anyway.

          A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

          maikel@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
          maikel@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
          maikel@vmst.io
          wrote last edited by
          #25

          @jaffathecake internet explorer from its grave.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

            @joshhunt if there is then they failed to show it. They posted a couple of links, including a survey about something else.

            oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
            oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
            oblomov@sociale.network
            wrote last edited by
            #26

            @jaffathecake @joshhunt it's like the XSLT situation in reverse

            Google: we want to drop XSLT support

            web developers: we really want you to keep XSLT and possibly upgrade support for v3 of the standard so we can use it with JSON too

            Google: OK, we've listened to everybody's opinion and nobody wants XSLT so we're dropping it.

            oblomov@sociale.networkO 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • oblomov@sociale.networkO oblomov@sociale.network

              @jaffathecake @joshhunt it's like the XSLT situation in reverse

              Google: we want to drop XSLT support

              web developers: we really want you to keep XSLT and possibly upgrade support for v3 of the standard so we can use it with JSON too

              Google: OK, we've listened to everybody's opinion and nobody wants XSLT so we're dropping it.

              oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
              oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
              oblomov@sociale.network
              wrote last edited by
              #27

              @jaffathecake @joshhunt

              (and obviously Mozilla follows suit, because why are they there if not to suck up to the bully)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • yoasif@mastodon.socialY yoasif@mastodon.social

                @jaffathecake Sounds kind of like how #Mozilla pushed ahead with #AI even after your lying polls about the provenance of training data in translations and the multitude of negative comments here and on Mozilla Connect.

                Pretty good blind spot for Mozilla - you can only tell when things are bad when your competitors do it.

                Link Preview Image
                Firefox’s AI Kill Switch is a Trap: How Mozilla Made AI Your Problem

                TL;DR: Mozilla recently released AI controls for Firefox: a singlecontrol panel that lets people disable AI features in the browser or pick andchoose which t...

                favicon

                Youssuff Quips (www.quippd.com)

                platymew@layer8.spaceP This user is from outside of this forum
                platymew@layer8.spaceP This user is from outside of this forum
                platymew@layer8.space
                wrote last edited by
                #28

                @yoasif @jaffathecake If the word ends in an s-like phoneme, you're supposed to eschew the s after the apostrophe.

                E.g. For Fox' sake! 😉

                yoasif@mastodon.socialY 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • platymew@layer8.spaceP platymew@layer8.space

                  @yoasif @jaffathecake If the word ends in an s-like phoneme, you're supposed to eschew the s after the apostrophe.

                  E.g. For Fox' sake! 😉

                  yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                  yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                  yoasif@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #29

                  @platymew @jaffathecake MLA and Chicago Manual of Style agree with what I did, at least: https://grammarist.com/punctuation/apostrophe-after-s-rules-and-examples/

                  platymew@layer8.spaceP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

                    So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:

                    Mozilla: Opposed
                    WebKit: Opposed
                    Microsoft: Several concerns
                    W3C TAG: Several concerns
                    Developers: Mostly negative

                    Chrome: Ships anyway.

                    A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

                    schouten_b@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    schouten_b@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    schouten_b@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #30

                    @jaffathecake There's a serious question to be asked about whether an engine shipping things which the broader standards community is opposed to can still be considered a standards compliant browser.

                    yoasif@mastodon.socialY 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • yoasif@mastodon.socialY yoasif@mastodon.social

                      @platymew @jaffathecake MLA and Chicago Manual of Style agree with what I did, at least: https://grammarist.com/punctuation/apostrophe-after-s-rules-and-examples/

                      platymew@layer8.spaceP This user is from outside of this forum
                      platymew@layer8.spaceP This user is from outside of this forum
                      platymew@layer8.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #31

                      @yoasif @jaffathecake Ah, yes, the Bri'ish vs. 'murrican vs. Internet rules of englishing. 🖖😅👍

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • schouten_b@mastodon.socialS schouten_b@mastodon.social

                        @jaffathecake There's a serious question to be asked about whether an engine shipping things which the broader standards community is opposed to can still be considered a standards compliant browser.

                        yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                        yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                        yoasif@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #32

                        @Schouten_B @jaffathecake Hasn't that happened before? Who else supported PNaCl?

                        I think that is kind of an academic question too, unfortunately - most developers seem to care less about whether something is a standard, and more about whether their userbase can access the feature.

                        schouten_b@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • yoasif@mastodon.socialY yoasif@mastodon.social

                          @Schouten_B @jaffathecake Hasn't that happened before? Who else supported PNaCl?

                          I think that is kind of an academic question too, unfortunately - most developers seem to care less about whether something is a standard, and more about whether their userbase can access the feature.

                          schouten_b@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          schouten_b@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          schouten_b@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #33

                          @yoasif @jaffathecake Sure, I think the PNaCl objections were of a different, less fundamental nature, but yeah, this is a question I've asked myself more often.

                          And sure, humans fundamentally look out for number 1 first. You're not wrong, but some do care about standards, I've been considering blocking Chrome on my own sites. Since they aren't commercial anyway and I don't care if people won't switch browsers in order to access them 🙂.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups