Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. People are cheapskates with poor people but spendthrift with billionaires.

People are cheapskates with poor people but spendthrift with billionaires.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
154 Posts 87 Posters 337 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • illuminatus@mstdn.socialI illuminatus@mstdn.social

    @baishen @futurebird This is all very "Protestant work ethics", classism, and trying to find ways to be a dick to others on the basis of some bullshit reason to feel superior to them.

    dirtside@phpc.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dirtside@phpc.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dirtside@phpc.social
    wrote last edited by
    #142

    @Illuminatus @baishen @futurebird if you follow the trail backwards to the root of all these selfish, capitalist, power-hungry mindsets, you always end up at the same place: the desire for domination.

    all human interaction is rooted either in domination or cooperation. having power over someone versus sacrificing control in order to work together. even Wilhoit's Law (which remains undefeated) is rooted in this: the desire for in-groups and out-groups is a mechanism for exerting dominance.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • stuartb@social.teamb.spaceS stuartb@social.teamb.space

      @webhat @futurebird @Illuminatus @baishen here in the UK, the people who were turning up for work every day and keeping the country going were generally those who work the worst hours, in some of the worst conditions, and generally get paid the least.
      When the return to work orders went out, we were hoping to get OUR 6 months off at 80% pay or whatever it was, but no, we had to keep on going in, because everyone was now back at work, so no time off!
      And those who had had months off work on 80% pay complained about how tired they were, being back at work, and how much they were looking forward to the next bank holiday (national holiday) the following weekend.
      I'll give you 1 guess who worked the bank holiday!
      Yep, the "Essential Workers", the "Key Workers", the people who had to keep going to work for 100% pay when everyone else seemed to be getting 80% pay for completing Netflix and Prime and publicly wondering when exactly was the right time to switch from day time pyjamas to night time pyjamas.
      And the worst part - the company sent out posters to each location at the start of the lockdowns, encouraging those who could work from home to do so.
      Yeah, the shelves in the supermarket are going to be really full if I try doing that job from home, but people at Head Orifice could work remotely.
      Yeah, we keep the country (and the company!) running, how about some pay, and some respect.

      capnthommo@c.imC This user is from outside of this forum
      capnthommo@c.imC This user is from outside of this forum
      capnthommo@c.im
      wrote last edited by
      #143

      @stuartb @webhat @futurebird @Illuminatus @baishen yes. You can't pay your bills with Thursday night eight o'clock clapping can you. However kindly some people meant it. Of course, some only used it as a photo op "see. See how much we care and how we're just like you" (yes, I'm looking at you, farage, johnson and company)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

        People are cheapskates with poor people but spendthrift with billionaires.

        I just listened to someone complaining about how "the garbage union" has schemed so that there are always two people operating NYC garbage trucks to "waste my tax dollars" and I guess making too many wealthy sanitation workers... oh no the horror.

        I like that there are two people on each truck. It's more efficient and safer. But, even if it was somehow a waste I promise you that's not who is wasting your money bud.

        4censord@unfug.social4 This user is from outside of this forum
        4censord@unfug.social4 This user is from outside of this forum
        4censord@unfug.social
        wrote last edited by
        #144

        @futurebird wait there are only two workers per truck?
        We* usually have 3-5, one driver with the rest collecting bins

        * were I am in Germany, no idea for the rest of it

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

          People are cheapskates with poor people but spendthrift with billionaires.

          I just listened to someone complaining about how "the garbage union" has schemed so that there are always two people operating NYC garbage trucks to "waste my tax dollars" and I guess making too many wealthy sanitation workers... oh no the horror.

          I like that there are two people on each truck. It's more efficient and safer. But, even if it was somehow a waste I promise you that's not who is wasting your money bud.

          mylittlemetroid@sfba.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mylittlemetroid@sfba.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mylittlemetroid@sfba.social
          wrote last edited by
          #145

          @futurebird everyone knows rich people are motivated by getting more money and poor people are motivated by getting less money. (/s)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

            People are cheapskates with poor people but spendthrift with billionaires.

            I just listened to someone complaining about how "the garbage union" has schemed so that there are always two people operating NYC garbage trucks to "waste my tax dollars" and I guess making too many wealthy sanitation workers... oh no the horror.

            I like that there are two people on each truck. It's more efficient and safer. But, even if it was somehow a waste I promise you that's not who is wasting your money bud.

            leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
            leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
            leeloo@c.im
            wrote last edited by
            #146

            @futurebird
            If one person takes three times as long to do the job, getting rid of one of them is not a sound financial decision.

            Trash is usually thrown in the back, opposite end as the cabin. Putting one person at each end saves a lot of walking back and forth.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

              @DavidM_yeg @billiglarper @david_chisnall

              My big concern is the same as Fran talks about in this video. When companies try to implement these systems they find ways to do it that steal public space. Why can't the robots park inside of your business and charge there? No room? Huh. Interesting.

              Looking at the robots the first thing I think of is that in NYC people would sit on them. (which will be very funny) So that design won't last at least.

              - YouTube

              Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.

              favicon

              (www.youtube.com)

              P This user is from outside of this forum
              P This user is from outside of this forum
              phosphenes@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #147

              @futurebird @DavidM_yeg @billiglarper @david_chisnall

              In the video, the part about the US prohibiting a Chinese radio telescope in Argentina is infuriating.

              If MAGA wanted to compete with Chinese science they wouldn't have defunded all the US science. They just don't want any science anywhere.

              'Anything good must be destroyed, even if it's none of our business.'

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gkemp@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                gkemp@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                gkemp@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #148

                @imikotoba @futurebird One garbage company here tried it with one worker per truck but they quickly went back to two. I don't know why; maybe you need fewer trucks with two workers, or maybe people refused to work solo like that.

                The truck is the expensive item here, not the workers.

                The people who are upset about two workers per truck have likely never done heavy labor before.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                  People are cheapskates with poor people but spendthrift with billionaires.

                  I just listened to someone complaining about how "the garbage union" has schemed so that there are always two people operating NYC garbage trucks to "waste my tax dollars" and I guess making too many wealthy sanitation workers... oh no the horror.

                  I like that there are two people on each truck. It's more efficient and safer. But, even if it was somehow a waste I promise you that's not who is wasting your money bud.

                  gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gimulnautti@mastodon.green
                  wrote last edited by
                  #149

                  @futurebird When the rules change based on who it is, Wilhoit’s law demonstrates that it is conservatism, it’s essence.

                  #wilhoitslaw

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG gimulnautti@mastodon.green

                    @futurebird When the rules change based on who it is, Wilhoit’s law demonstrates that it is conservatism, it’s essence.

                    #wilhoitslaw

                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    baishen@mastodon.online
                    wrote last edited by
                    #150

                    @gimulnautti @futurebird If your first response to hearing about children being killed is to ask who's kids, there's something wrong with you.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B baishen@mastodon.online

                      @futurebird Reminds me of the joke about the guy who will do anything to protect his family but he just means killing someone. Not anything actually useful like making sure the kids are clean, well fed, getting with housework, etc.

                      ptr_k@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
                      ptr_k@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
                      ptr_k@dice.camp
                      wrote last edited by
                      #151

                      @baishen @futurebird
                      Meatloaf Proviso - When a statement of dedication contains specifically exempted forms of service to be defined at a later time.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                        People are cheapskates with poor people but spendthrift with billionaires.

                        I just listened to someone complaining about how "the garbage union" has schemed so that there are always two people operating NYC garbage trucks to "waste my tax dollars" and I guess making too many wealthy sanitation workers... oh no the horror.

                        I like that there are two people on each truck. It's more efficient and safer. But, even if it was somehow a waste I promise you that's not who is wasting your money bud.

                        netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                        netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                        netzblockierer@tech.lgbt
                        wrote last edited by
                        #152

                        @futurebird exactly!

                        Besides a driver upfront & two workers at the rear are the standard even in Europe, because most garbage trucks can take 1 big or twovregular/small containers at the same time and they do workflow to maximize the amount of containers they empty per time.

                        • There's a reason this job even has a traineeship program in Germany, and it's not just due to safety reasons, but because it is a demanding job.
                          • And the people doing this filthy job certainly deserve their paycheck, if not a hefty raise on top of the "Filthyness Premium".

                        Cuz unlike value-removing Billionaires, they do provide a vital service and prevent cities from choking in their own filth!

                        • Everyone who claims otherwise is a useful idiot who ate up classist propaganda.

                        #Garbage #Workers #ValueRemoving #Billionaires #UsefulIdiots #Classism #Propaganda

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B baishen@mastodon.online

                          @futurebird Reminds me of the joke about the guy who will do anything to protect his family but he just means killing someone. Not anything actually useful like making sure the kids are clean, well fed, getting with housework, etc.

                          riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                          riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                          riley@toot.cat
                          wrote last edited by
                          #153

                          @baishen Well, you know how a common trope in cop-speak is replacing common nouns with formal-sounding slightly more generic ones, like car -> 'vehicle' ?

                          In this case, this very same pattern applies, the stupid person just thought that 'doing anything' is the formal-sounding slightly more generic euphemism for 'murder'.

                          @futurebird

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • illuminatus@mstdn.socialI illuminatus@mstdn.social

                            @baishen @futurebird This is all very "Protestant work ethics", classism, and trying to find ways to be a dick to others on the basis of some bullshit reason to feel superior to them.

                            riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                            riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                            riley@toot.cat
                            wrote last edited by
                            #154

                            @Illuminatus Probably more like Calvinist ethic. I've never heard German Protestants complain about two-person garbage collection teams, and there's plenty of Protestants around, and garbage collection has been done by two people every time I've seen it done. One drives the lorry, the other one picks up the yellow sacks or empties the containers into the lorry.

                            @baishen @futurebird

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups