Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. Mastodon
  4. Today we're sharing the first in a series of three posts from our leadership team, starting with @mellifluousbox discussing our mission, and priorities for 2026.

Today we're sharing the first in a series of three posts from our leadership team, starting with @mellifluousbox discussing our mission, and priorities for 2026.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Mastodon
103 Posts 37 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #63

    @LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

    well yeah

    and new gang recruits are asked to shoot someone in the head as they watch for much the same reason

    neither of which tell us much about the topic here

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

      @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

      the problem isn't mastodon it's your govt

      if mastodon servers don't implement age verification in those jurisdictions that make it law, those servers get shut down by that govt

      so you're blaming the wrong entity

      are you really asking servers to face legal punishment and then get shut down anyway?

      don't get me wrong: be angry

      *at your govt*

      not mastodon

      dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      dalias@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #64

      @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox No, they cannot get shut down by a government they're not operating under. If there's a threat, move legal operations & hosting out of the jurisdiction and obfuscate physical location of servers behind VPNs. Don't fucking comply.

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

        @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox No, they cannot get shut down by a government they're not operating under. If there's a threat, move legal operations & hosting out of the jurisdiction and obfuscate physical location of servers behind VPNs. Don't fucking comply.

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #65

        @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

        that's not really true

        for many countries you have to follow the laws of *both* your home country and the country where your server resides

        of course that's not true for all countries

        but if let's say you're a citizen of the germany and your server is hosted in another country, germany just goes after you, it doesn't care

        "obfuscate physical location of servers behind VPNs"

        no. that's no protection

        dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

          @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

          that's not really true

          for many countries you have to follow the laws of *both* your home country and the country where your server resides

          of course that's not true for all countries

          but if let's say you're a citizen of the germany and your server is hosted in another country, germany just goes after you, it doesn't care

          "obfuscate physical location of servers behind VPNs"

          no. that's no protection

          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          dalias@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #66

          @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox None of that contradicts what I said. You don't run it as a citizen or resident of the hostile jurisdiction. You pass ownership to an entity in a safe location, and you put the fronting IP in a safe location. Physical servers can be somewhere else, but shouldn't be somewhere under the hostile jurisdiction unless you're confident there's no trail to them.

          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

            @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox None of that contradicts what I said. You don't run it as a citizen or resident of the hostile jurisdiction. You pass ownership to an entity in a safe location, and you put the fronting IP in a safe location. Physical servers can be somewhere else, but shouldn't be somewhere under the hostile jurisdiction unless you're confident there's no trail to them.

            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #67

            @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

            if you're already in a safe jurisdiction, yes, get your servers out of a bad jurisdiction, absolutely

            but if you're in an unsafe jurisdiction, it doesn't matter where your servers are. if they want to target you, they'll target you, and no amount of obfuscation will protect you from that

            of course if you're a small fish doing small fish things, you'll probably be fine for a long time

            dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

              @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

              if you're already in a safe jurisdiction, yes, get your servers out of a bad jurisdiction, absolutely

              but if you're in an unsafe jurisdiction, it doesn't matter where your servers are. if they want to target you, they'll target you, and no amount of obfuscation will protect you from that

              of course if you're a small fish doing small fish things, you'll probably be fine for a long time

              dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
              dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
              dalias@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #68

              @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox You just make it so it's no longer you running it. It's been passed off to an entity legally incorporated someplace else, and your involvement is as a volunteer or contractor working with a foreign entity for which you have no authority to implement the type of "age verification" your government wants them to impose.

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB vervain@sunny.gardenV 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox You just make it so it's no longer you running it. It's been passed off to an entity legally incorporated someplace else, and your involvement is as a volunteer or contractor working with a foreign entity for which you have no authority to implement the type of "age verification" your government wants them to impose.

                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #69

                @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                so let's say i'm in the uk. you expect me to set up in let's say canada

                under someone else's name? what? you have those kinds of connections?

                nevermind the added cost

                also the effort will trigger more interest in you than if you never tried it. when they find out you're just trying to avoid age verification they'll laugh

                you think govts aren't used to this kind of intrigue from dealing with crypto/ gambling/ silkroad/ pedophile rings/ etc?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                  @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox

                  i have a better idea:

                  do what valve does

                  you need a credit card

                  they run a $0 authorization

                  *no id docs needed*

                  the server doesn't deal with sensitive data

                  even better:

                  now your cc is attached to your mastodon profile

                  your cc is right there for donating to the server later

                  as more people should be doing

                  snag:

                  germany doesn't consider a cc legally acceptable

                  but other jurisdictions do

                  Link Preview Image
                  Steam UK users will now need a credit card to access mature content due to the Online Safety Act

                  Valve recently put up a new support page, detailing the steps they've taken to comply with the UK Online Safety Act.

                  favicon

                  GamingOnLinux (www.gamingonlinux.com)

                  @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron

                  janantos@f.czJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  janantos@f.czJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  janantos@f.cz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #70

                  @benroyce @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron it is to utter idea, I don’t want to have amd I know a lot of people who doesn’t want to have credit cards and are completely ok with Debit Cards. 1. There are people who do not want to be formally in debt, 2. There are people who do not want to be formally in higher loan to salary ratio. (Yes when I was asking for mortgage, I got rid of CC, because it was literally increasing my debt to salary ratio even when it is not used, by its credit limits) and as last thing asking gamers (and yes gaming is addictive) when there are games with concept of in game payments for credit card is just wrong. It shall be regulated the same way as online gambling is.

                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • janantos@f.czJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    janantos@f.czJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    janantos@f.cz
                    wrote last edited by
                    #71

                    @LukefromDC @benroyce @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic In case of mastodon you don’t need to possess ID, there are several KYC services, who verifies your customer and issue proof he is eg age verified. And you never posses any ID, CC etc. I would say this will be smaller burden (perhaps even cheaper) that setting whole payment infrastructure.

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • janantos@f.czJ janantos@f.cz

                      @benroyce @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron it is to utter idea, I don’t want to have amd I know a lot of people who doesn’t want to have credit cards and are completely ok with Debit Cards. 1. There are people who do not want to be formally in debt, 2. There are people who do not want to be formally in higher loan to salary ratio. (Yes when I was asking for mortgage, I got rid of CC, because it was literally increasing my debt to salary ratio even when it is not used, by its credit limits) and as last thing asking gamers (and yes gaming is addictive) when there are games with concept of in game payments for credit card is just wrong. It shall be regulated the same way as online gambling is.

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #72

                      @janantos @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron

                      It's entirely possible to own a credit card and not use it

                      The point is to solve the problem of age verification without asking anyone's age, and using cc solves that problem

                      But you also want to solve the problem of addictive personalities who wind up stuck on gambling?

                      What

                      You ask far too much

                      Nothing can function in this world on this level of concern

                      Scope your concerns to reasonable goals please

                      janantos@f.czJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • janantos@f.czJ janantos@f.cz

                        @LukefromDC @benroyce @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic In case of mastodon you don’t need to possess ID, there are several KYC services, who verifies your customer and issue proof he is eg age verified. And you never posses any ID, CC etc. I would say this will be smaller burden (perhaps even cheaper) that setting whole payment infrastructure.

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #73

                        @janantos @LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

                        You're talking about decentralized identity

                        You can see vestiges of that in the project's history

                        So it looks like they abandoned that

                        Perhaps because it's not up to snuff yet?

                        But I don't know, I'm not up to speed

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                          @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox You just make it so it's no longer you running it. It's been passed off to an entity legally incorporated someplace else, and your involvement is as a volunteer or contractor working with a foreign entity for which you have no authority to implement the type of "age verification" your government wants them to impose.

                          vervain@sunny.gardenV This user is from outside of this forum
                          vervain@sunny.gardenV This user is from outside of this forum
                          vervain@sunny.garden
                          wrote last edited by
                          #74

                          @dalias
                          Thank you for standing up for what is right. It is terrible seeing the excuses.

                          @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • vervain@sunny.gardenV vervain@sunny.garden

                            @dalias
                            Thank you for standing up for what is right. It is terrible seeing the excuses.

                            @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #75

                            @vervain @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                            it's about what works or not

                            there isn't excuses, there's dealing with reality

                            if someone wants to be pure and not deal with reality, ok

                            but the rest of us are trying to deal with the bullshit

                            and for that, i suppose we're a vast evil

                            🙄

                            same old toxic idealism, not achieving shit, but sure good at whining

                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P pablomuyo@mastodon.social

                              @Mastodon @mellifluousbox Mastodon could aspire to replace X in Europe (given the current situation in the U.S. and the state of X). It is urgent that it include translation capabilities for this multilingual region

                              chewie@mammut.gogreenit.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                              chewie@mammut.gogreenit.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                              chewie@mammut.gogreenit.net
                              wrote last edited by
                              #76

                              @pablomuyo @Mastodon @mellifluousbox what do you mean? Libretranslate works well on my instance for translating posts

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mastodon@mastodon.socialM mastodon@mastodon.social

                                Today we're sharing the first in a series of three posts from our leadership team, starting with @mellifluousbox discussing our mission, and priorities for 2026. Stay tuned this week for more.

                                Link Preview Image
                                Connecting the world through thriving online communities

                                A message from our Executive Director about Mastodon's vision and mission.

                                favicon

                                Mastodon Blog (blog.joinmastodon.org)

                                ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                ret@furry.engineer
                                wrote last edited by
                                #77

                                @Mastodon do not, I repeat DO NOT attempt to implement age verification. You’ll kill the platform. See: Discord.

                                Decentralised, federated networks are one of the few bastions from which we can fight this. Don’t throw that away.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                  @iju @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                                  looking at the emoji in aria's profile, not knowing if they are trans, but if they are i understand why they feel threatened by id checks

                                  if i were trans i would feel intensely threatened, physically, mortally, by id checks

                                  especially in countries like my like stupid fucking country (the usa)

                                  at the same time:

                                  if i *really* cared about id checks, i wouldn't be attacking the wrong entity

                                  aria's heart is in the right place but their brain is AWOL

                                  ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ret@furry.engineer
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #78

                                  @benroyce fuck you, average mastodon dot social user

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                    @vervain @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                                    it's about what works or not

                                    there isn't excuses, there's dealing with reality

                                    if someone wants to be pure and not deal with reality, ok

                                    but the rest of us are trying to deal with the bullshit

                                    and for that, i suppose we're a vast evil

                                    🙄

                                    same old toxic idealism, not achieving shit, but sure good at whining

                                    dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dalias@hachyderm.io
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #79

                                    @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox You're trying to deal with defeat before it even happens. Governments DGAF about your Mastodon instance. But they're happy to have you complying in advance.

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mastodon@mastodon.socialM mastodon@mastodon.social

                                      Today we're sharing the first in a series of three posts from our leadership team, starting with @mellifluousbox discussing our mission, and priorities for 2026. Stay tuned this week for more.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Connecting the world through thriving online communities

                                      A message from our Executive Director about Mastodon's vision and mission.

                                      favicon

                                      Mastodon Blog (blog.joinmastodon.org)

                                      ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ret@furry.engineer
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #80

                                      @Mastodon @mellifluousbox @Gargron Project leaders should commit now to never poison the codebase with this stuff. If individual servers want to implement invasive age-checks (or have to in order to satisfy their local laws), that's up to them, but do not allow such things to fracture the Fediverse. Commit now to never allowing features such as blocking federation to/from non-age-verified servers.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • nitrml@tyrol.socialN nitrml@tyrol.social

                                        @benroyce @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

                                        1. Mastodon's code already includes a setting which server admins can enable to set a minimum age for their server, which will ask for a date of birth to be entered during sign-up. The date of birth is not stored, only checked once. This has been part of Mastodon's code since multiple months now: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/34150

                                        2. What they say in the blog is that they will audit the GmbH's own servers, which probably includes an audit of this feature.

                                        3. The interesting stuff is what that "working group" will come up with.

                                        angelina@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        angelina@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        angelina@mastodon.online
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #81

                                        @nitrml @benroyce @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic 🤮

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                          @janantos @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron

                                          It's entirely possible to own a credit card and not use it

                                          The point is to solve the problem of age verification without asking anyone's age, and using cc solves that problem

                                          But you also want to solve the problem of addictive personalities who wind up stuck on gambling?

                                          What

                                          You ask far too much

                                          Nothing can function in this world on this level of concern

                                          Scope your concerns to reasonable goals please

                                          janantos@f.czJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          janantos@f.czJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          janantos@f.cz
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #82

                                          @benroyce @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron absolutely. However that time, even if you don’t use it, the credit limit goes negative to your credit score in bank risk assesment.

                                          iju@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups