Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. Mastodon
  4. Today we're sharing the first in a series of three posts from our leadership team, starting with @mellifluousbox discussing our mission, and priorities for 2026.

Today we're sharing the first in a series of three posts from our leadership team, starting with @mellifluousbox discussing our mission, and priorities for 2026.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Mastodon
103 Posts 37 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #54

    @LukefromDC @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron

    again that's all fine and good

    but if you're asking a server to shut down with thousands of accounts when people can just enter a fake birthday it's far too dramatic

    effective resistance is not about purity

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #55

      @LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

      you mean tor and VPN providers that spy on the people who use it because anyone using that it is flagging their activity as sensitive?

      tor was started at the us naval research laboratory for dissidents in countries unfriendly to the usa

      you think they don't have enough exit nodes to see what is going on?

      and mastodon needs support

      i'd almost (i said almost) support the idea of mandatory ccs on sign up with or without id laws

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #56

        @LukefromDC @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron

        great

        would you characterize yourself as the average mastodon user? or more broadly, the average social media user?

        most people want to sign onto a server, browse, and post

        that's it

        you can't go after them for that, people don't have the bandwidth or time for the hassles

        and we can't become a tiny whisper of a cryptic fringe to adhere to some unnecessary purity test

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #57

          @LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

          .onion doesn't use exit nodes but it uses rendezvous nodes

          and nobody wants to kill tor, the intelligence services love it

          the foolishness is people who think something built by the us govt is perfectly anonymous

          it *is* anonymous. to most every other entity

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #58

            @LukefromDC @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron

            zero argument

            and if you make the services you talk about user friendly enough that the average social media user can point and click and zero hassle, even better

            until then, some servers are stuck in unfriendly districts

            and that's not their fault

            the govt is at fault

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              benroyce@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #59

              @LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

              understood

              but we're now very far away from your average normie who just wants to see cat pictures

              and that's where this topic truly lies

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #60

                @LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

                100%

                and that's why we can't do purity tests on resistance

                purity tests destroy effective resistance

                effective resistance that isn't pure is not a betrayal

                we resist how we can, in the ways we can

                this isn't an argument against your words, i'm just harking back to the argument up higher

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA ariarhythmic@ohai.social

                  @benroyce @starlily Have you ever heard of the idea of disobedience?

                  qgustavor@urusai.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
                  qgustavor@urusai.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
                  qgustavor@urusai.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #61

                  @ariarhythmic @benroyce @starlily Great, fascism will make good Mastodon instances have the same status as BitTorrent trackers and pirate streaming websites!

                  Well, the tracker I used to contribute for is still up even today, thus we may think disobedience is fine, they will not go for small instances. On the other hand, it's a false correlation: one thing is Crunchyroll, Netflix and other companies choosing not to go against small groups because they may die out of just from not getting enough donations, other thing is fascist governments. They are already going against individuals, people fear ICE, as an example.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                    @LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

                    i yearly enjoy the services that sometimes say happy birthday to me...

                    on the fake birthday i've been entering since forever

                    🤭

                    salixsericea@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    salixsericea@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    salixsericea@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #62

                    @benroyce @LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic LOL, yes. I am so used to fake birthdays that I have to make an extra effort to enter the correct one if needed.

                    I oopsied my birthday for an online plane ticket booking after 9/11. No issue. Got to fly as booked.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #63

                      @LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

                      well yeah

                      and new gang recruits are asked to shoot someone in the head as they watch for much the same reason

                      neither of which tell us much about the topic here

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                        @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                        the problem isn't mastodon it's your govt

                        if mastodon servers don't implement age verification in those jurisdictions that make it law, those servers get shut down by that govt

                        so you're blaming the wrong entity

                        are you really asking servers to face legal punishment and then get shut down anyway?

                        don't get me wrong: be angry

                        *at your govt*

                        not mastodon

                        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dalias@hachyderm.io
                        wrote last edited by
                        #64

                        @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox No, they cannot get shut down by a government they're not operating under. If there's a threat, move legal operations & hosting out of the jurisdiction and obfuscate physical location of servers behind VPNs. Don't fucking comply.

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                          @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox No, they cannot get shut down by a government they're not operating under. If there's a threat, move legal operations & hosting out of the jurisdiction and obfuscate physical location of servers behind VPNs. Don't fucking comply.

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benroyce@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #65

                          @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                          that's not really true

                          for many countries you have to follow the laws of *both* your home country and the country where your server resides

                          of course that's not true for all countries

                          but if let's say you're a citizen of the germany and your server is hosted in another country, germany just goes after you, it doesn't care

                          "obfuscate physical location of servers behind VPNs"

                          no. that's no protection

                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                            @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                            that's not really true

                            for many countries you have to follow the laws of *both* your home country and the country where your server resides

                            of course that's not true for all countries

                            but if let's say you're a citizen of the germany and your server is hosted in another country, germany just goes after you, it doesn't care

                            "obfuscate physical location of servers behind VPNs"

                            no. that's no protection

                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dalias@hachyderm.io
                            wrote last edited by
                            #66

                            @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox None of that contradicts what I said. You don't run it as a citizen or resident of the hostile jurisdiction. You pass ownership to an entity in a safe location, and you put the fronting IP in a safe location. Physical servers can be somewhere else, but shouldn't be somewhere under the hostile jurisdiction unless you're confident there's no trail to them.

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                              @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox None of that contradicts what I said. You don't run it as a citizen or resident of the hostile jurisdiction. You pass ownership to an entity in a safe location, and you put the fronting IP in a safe location. Physical servers can be somewhere else, but shouldn't be somewhere under the hostile jurisdiction unless you're confident there's no trail to them.

                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #67

                              @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                              if you're already in a safe jurisdiction, yes, get your servers out of a bad jurisdiction, absolutely

                              but if you're in an unsafe jurisdiction, it doesn't matter where your servers are. if they want to target you, they'll target you, and no amount of obfuscation will protect you from that

                              of course if you're a small fish doing small fish things, you'll probably be fine for a long time

                              dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                                if you're already in a safe jurisdiction, yes, get your servers out of a bad jurisdiction, absolutely

                                but if you're in an unsafe jurisdiction, it doesn't matter where your servers are. if they want to target you, they'll target you, and no amount of obfuscation will protect you from that

                                of course if you're a small fish doing small fish things, you'll probably be fine for a long time

                                dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dalias@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #68

                                @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox You just make it so it's no longer you running it. It's been passed off to an entity legally incorporated someplace else, and your involvement is as a volunteer or contractor working with a foreign entity for which you have no authority to implement the type of "age verification" your government wants them to impose.

                                benroyce@mastodon.socialB vervain@sunny.gardenV 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                                  @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox You just make it so it's no longer you running it. It's been passed off to an entity legally incorporated someplace else, and your involvement is as a volunteer or contractor working with a foreign entity for which you have no authority to implement the type of "age verification" your government wants them to impose.

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #69

                                  @dalias @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                                  so let's say i'm in the uk. you expect me to set up in let's say canada

                                  under someone else's name? what? you have those kinds of connections?

                                  nevermind the added cost

                                  also the effort will trigger more interest in you than if you never tried it. when they find out you're just trying to avoid age verification they'll laugh

                                  you think govts aren't used to this kind of intrigue from dealing with crypto/ gambling/ silkroad/ pedophile rings/ etc?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                    @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox

                                    i have a better idea:

                                    do what valve does

                                    you need a credit card

                                    they run a $0 authorization

                                    *no id docs needed*

                                    the server doesn't deal with sensitive data

                                    even better:

                                    now your cc is attached to your mastodon profile

                                    your cc is right there for donating to the server later

                                    as more people should be doing

                                    snag:

                                    germany doesn't consider a cc legally acceptable

                                    but other jurisdictions do

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Steam UK users will now need a credit card to access mature content due to the Online Safety Act

                                    Valve recently put up a new support page, detailing the steps they've taken to comply with the UK Online Safety Act.

                                    favicon

                                    GamingOnLinux (www.gamingonlinux.com)

                                    @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron

                                    janantos@f.czJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    janantos@f.czJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    janantos@f.cz
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #70

                                    @benroyce @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron it is to utter idea, I don’t want to have amd I know a lot of people who doesn’t want to have credit cards and are completely ok with Debit Cards. 1. There are people who do not want to be formally in debt, 2. There are people who do not want to be formally in higher loan to salary ratio. (Yes when I was asking for mortgage, I got rid of CC, because it was literally increasing my debt to salary ratio even when it is not used, by its credit limits) and as last thing asking gamers (and yes gaming is addictive) when there are games with concept of in game payments for credit card is just wrong. It shall be regulated the same way as online gambling is.

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • janantos@f.czJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      janantos@f.czJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      janantos@f.cz
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #71

                                      @LukefromDC @benroyce @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic In case of mastodon you don’t need to possess ID, there are several KYC services, who verifies your customer and issue proof he is eg age verified. And you never posses any ID, CC etc. I would say this will be smaller burden (perhaps even cheaper) that setting whole payment infrastructure.

                                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • janantos@f.czJ janantos@f.cz

                                        @benroyce @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron it is to utter idea, I don’t want to have amd I know a lot of people who doesn’t want to have credit cards and are completely ok with Debit Cards. 1. There are people who do not want to be formally in debt, 2. There are people who do not want to be formally in higher loan to salary ratio. (Yes when I was asking for mortgage, I got rid of CC, because it was literally increasing my debt to salary ratio even when it is not used, by its credit limits) and as last thing asking gamers (and yes gaming is addictive) when there are games with concept of in game payments for credit card is just wrong. It shall be regulated the same way as online gambling is.

                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #72

                                        @janantos @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron

                                        It's entirely possible to own a credit card and not use it

                                        The point is to solve the problem of age verification without asking anyone's age, and using cc solves that problem

                                        But you also want to solve the problem of addictive personalities who wind up stuck on gambling?

                                        What

                                        You ask far too much

                                        Nothing can function in this world on this level of concern

                                        Scope your concerns to reasonable goals please

                                        janantos@f.czJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • janantos@f.czJ janantos@f.cz

                                          @LukefromDC @benroyce @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic In case of mastodon you don’t need to possess ID, there are several KYC services, who verifies your customer and issue proof he is eg age verified. And you never posses any ID, CC etc. I would say this will be smaller burden (perhaps even cheaper) that setting whole payment infrastructure.

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #73

                                          @janantos @LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

                                          You're talking about decentralized identity

                                          You can see vestiges of that in the project's history

                                          So it looks like they abandoned that

                                          Perhaps because it's not up to snuff yet?

                                          But I don't know, I'm not up to speed

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups