Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
51 Posts 35 Posters 49 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

    @phil @EndlessMason "guns don't kill people" hasn't been convincing for decades.

    phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
    phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
    phil@fed.bajsicki.com
    wrote last edited by
    #13

    @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io
    Guns, like any tool, need to be carefully managed by any human owning/ controlling them. LLMs can do a crapload of damage, but they can't be held accountable, just like a computer can't be held accountable for what sysadmins do.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • phil@fed.bajsicki.comP phil@fed.bajsicki.com

      @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
      To my knowledge, the fundamental forces of the universe, just like dead matter (including LLMs), don't have agency of their own.

      Humans do.

      endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
      endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
      endlessmason@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #14

      @phil @neurovagrant
      I don't.

      I'm a stimulus-response machine. I'm governed by the laws of physics exclusively.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE endlessmason@hachyderm.io

        @phil @neurovagrant
        HahhahahahhahhahhahhhahhHhHahjahahhahahahhahahhahahhaHhHHHhz aside from escalating the rate at which we're rendering the hahhhha planet unliveable hahHahahjhaha fucking good point man. Oh boy

        phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
        phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
        phil@fed.bajsicki.com
        wrote last edited by
        #15

        @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
        Running Qwen3.5 on my 7900xtx eats as much power as running any video game. I have zero issue with running LLMs locally to assist with my journals/ notes. Nothing compared to a data center.

        neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN jae@mastodon.bsd.cafeJ 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • phil@fed.bajsicki.comP phil@fed.bajsicki.com

          @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
          Running Qwen3.5 on my 7900xtx eats as much power as running any video game. I have zero issue with running LLMs locally to assist with my journals/ notes. Nothing compared to a data center.

          neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
          neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
          neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
          wrote last edited by
          #16

          @phil @EndlessMason this has gotten a bit tedious for me, if y'all want to continue, please start a thread between yourselves/untag me, thanks

          endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

            When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

            I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

            the_blackwell_ninja@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
            the_blackwell_ninja@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
            the_blackwell_ninja@mastodon.online
            wrote last edited by
            #17

            @neurovagrant We invented tech vulnerable to classic computer viruses, and social engineering too! Best of both worlds!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

              @phil @EndlessMason this has gotten a bit tedious for me, if y'all want to continue, please start a thread between yourselves/untag me, thanks

              endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
              endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
              endlessmason@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #18

              @neurovagrant nah I'm good

              neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE endlessmason@hachyderm.io

                @neurovagrant nah I'm good

                neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                wrote last edited by
                #19

                @EndlessMason i hear that

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                  When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                  I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                  ox1de@cyberplace.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  ox1de@cyberplace.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  ox1de@cyberplace.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #20

                  @neurovagrant i suspect we have two weak links now, great!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                    When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                    I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                    kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #21

                    @neurovagrant

                    :sigh: better than humans *again*!

                    the end is nigh....

                    (/s)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                      When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                      I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cr0w@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22

                      @neurovagrant

                      massive bong rip

                      Who decided to deploy the LLMs? It wasn't a computer...

                      lerxst@az.socialL huronbikes@cyberplace.socialH 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                        When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                        I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                        misusecase@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        misusecase@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        misusecase@twit.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #23

                        @neurovagrant To err is human, but to *really* agree things up you need a computer.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                          @neurovagrant

                          massive bong rip

                          Who decided to deploy the LLMs? It wasn't a computer...

                          lerxst@az.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lerxst@az.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lerxst@az.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #24

                          @cR0w @neurovagrant
                          Or *was* it? <dramatic music>

                          cr0w@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • lerxst@az.socialL lerxst@az.social

                            @cR0w @neurovagrant
                            Or *was* it? <dramatic music>

                            cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cr0w@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #25

                            @lerxst @neurovagrant

                            Link Preview Image
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                              When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                              I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                              catavz@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              catavz@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              catavz@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #26

                              @neurovagrant

                              Link Preview Image
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                                When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                                I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                                lmk@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lmk@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lmk@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #27

                                @neurovagrant Well we do have humans carelessly accepting AI submits without an review: one could consider them an even weaker chain.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                                  When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                                  I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                                  starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  starkrg@myside-yourside.net
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #28

                                  @neurovagrant It's still kind of a human's fault for installing that weak link. The weakest link are the c-suite making terrible decisions.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                                    When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                                    I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                                    madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    madengineering@mastodon.cloud
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #29

                                    @neurovagrant okay, now the weakest link is the human who decided "I think I'll outsource my work to a dumbass who's wrong about everything."

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                                      When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                                      I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                                      chasalin@mastodon.chasalin.nlC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      chasalin@mastodon.chasalin.nlC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      chasalin@mastodon.chasalin.nl
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #30

                                      @neurovagrant now the weakest link is the human who decided to implement AI.
                                      So what's changed?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • phil@fed.bajsicki.comP phil@fed.bajsicki.com

                                        @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                                        Running Qwen3.5 on my 7900xtx eats as much power as running any video game. I have zero issue with running LLMs locally to assist with my journals/ notes. Nothing compared to a data center.

                                        jae@mastodon.bsd.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jae@mastodon.bsd.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jae@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #31

                                        @phil @neurovagrant @EndlessMason similar experience. humans can drive these models if they have a decent engineering/security understanding. i've got no issue with leveraging it to offload tedious tasks and operational burden.

                                        but to your point on the human factor, there's been a lot of footgunning lately. even with principal staff getting lazy.

                                        running models on a ada4000-20gb works pretty nicely and way less power use than a dc or some 5090 monster i need a new circuit for

                                        phil@fed.bajsicki.comP 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                                          When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                                          I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                                          sarah@phpc.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          sarah@phpc.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          sarah@phpc.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #32

                                          @neurovagrant it still is the human. They just changed how they break things. Instead of breaking things themselves they trust a machine that does it.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups