Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
51 Posts 35 Posters 49 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

    When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

    I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

    phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
    phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
    phil@fed.bajsicki.com
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
    ?
    They haven't.

    endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

      When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

      I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

      srazkvt@tech.lgbtS This user is from outside of this forum
      srazkvt@tech.lgbtS This user is from outside of this forum
      srazkvt@tech.lgbt
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @neurovagrant while the post is funny, fundamentally, no, they haven't. what they've done is creating something that is considered by the weakest link in the chain to be something that improves the security, when it does the opposite

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

        When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

        I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

        klara@drupal.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
        klara@drupal.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
        klara@drupal.community
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @neurovagrant Not on their own, but Llm's do allow different humans to also compete for weakest link.
        A!i

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
        • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

          When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

          I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

          ids1024@mathstodon.xyzI This user is from outside of this forum
          ids1024@mathstodon.xyzI This user is from outside of this forum
          ids1024@mathstodon.xyz
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @neurovagrant The weakest link is a mediocre statistical approximation of the human.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
          • phil@fed.bajsicki.comP phil@fed.bajsicki.com

            @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
            ?
            They haven't.

            endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
            endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
            endlessmason@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @phil @neurovagrant
            Most humans don't copy/paste commands from ticket titles into their shells...

            phil@fed.bajsicki.comP 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE endlessmason@hachyderm.io

              @phil @neurovagrant
              Most humans don't copy/paste commands from ticket titles into their shells...

              phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
              phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
              phil@fed.bajsicki.com
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
              Sorry,
              who decided to, and then gave these tools access to do so?

              Putting a non-deterministic tool with """safeguards""" there has very predictable consequences. If not humans, who exactly is to blame for this mess?

              Cause it sure isn't a pile of numbers.

              endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • phil@fed.bajsicki.comP phil@fed.bajsicki.com

                @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                Sorry,
                who decided to, and then gave these tools access to do so?

                Putting a non-deterministic tool with """safeguards""" there has very predictable consequences. If not humans, who exactly is to blame for this mess?

                Cause it sure isn't a pile of numbers.

                endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                endlessmason@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @phil @neurovagrant
                Oh I see. In that case we should blame the fundamental forces of the universe for kicking off formation of planets and bootstrapping abiogenesis and evolution.

                phil@fed.bajsicki.comP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE endlessmason@hachyderm.io

                  @phil @neurovagrant
                  Most humans don't copy/paste commands from ticket titles into their shells...

                  phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                  phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                  phil@fed.bajsicki.com
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org As a sidenote, I've seen things you wouldn't believe in the last few months that has me genuinely convinced that it's humans that made LLMs look bad, rather than LLMs being bad intrinsically (aside from the copyright issues, power drain, freshwater use, global warming, financial abuse, privacy issues, deals with government...).

                  The math models (locally hosted, fitting on gaming GPUs) can be fairly easily be made useful and helpful (a few days of effort after work) in menial tasks that can't be completed deterministically, provided basic oversight. They cost pennies, and they're private.

                  endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE randomdamage@infosec.exchangeR 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE endlessmason@hachyderm.io

                    @phil @neurovagrant
                    Oh I see. In that case we should blame the fundamental forces of the universe for kicking off formation of planets and bootstrapping abiogenesis and evolution.

                    phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                    phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                    phil@fed.bajsicki.com
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                    To my knowledge, the fundamental forces of the universe, just like dead matter (including LLMs), don't have agency of their own.

                    Humans do.

                    neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • phil@fed.bajsicki.comP phil@fed.bajsicki.com

                      @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                      To my knowledge, the fundamental forces of the universe, just like dead matter (including LLMs), don't have agency of their own.

                      Humans do.

                      neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                      neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                      neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @phil @EndlessMason "guns don't kill people" hasn't been convincing for decades.

                      phil@fed.bajsicki.comP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • phil@fed.bajsicki.comP phil@fed.bajsicki.com

                        @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org As a sidenote, I've seen things you wouldn't believe in the last few months that has me genuinely convinced that it's humans that made LLMs look bad, rather than LLMs being bad intrinsically (aside from the copyright issues, power drain, freshwater use, global warming, financial abuse, privacy issues, deals with government...).

                        The math models (locally hosted, fitting on gaming GPUs) can be fairly easily be made useful and helpful (a few days of effort after work) in menial tasks that can't be completed deterministically, provided basic oversight. They cost pennies, and they're private.

                        endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                        endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                        endlessmason@hachyderm.io
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @phil @neurovagrant
                        HahhahahahhahhahhahhhahhHhHahjahahhahahahhahahhahahhaHhHHHhz aside from escalating the rate at which we're rendering the hahhhha planet unliveable hahHahahjhaha fucking good point man. Oh boy

                        phil@fed.bajsicki.comP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                          @phil @EndlessMason "guns don't kill people" hasn't been convincing for decades.

                          phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                          phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                          phil@fed.bajsicki.com
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io
                          Guns, like any tool, need to be carefully managed by any human owning/ controlling them. LLMs can do a crapload of damage, but they can't be held accountable, just like a computer can't be held accountable for what sysadmins do.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • phil@fed.bajsicki.comP phil@fed.bajsicki.com

                            @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                            To my knowledge, the fundamental forces of the universe, just like dead matter (including LLMs), don't have agency of their own.

                            Humans do.

                            endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                            endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                            endlessmason@hachyderm.io
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @phil @neurovagrant
                            I don't.

                            I'm a stimulus-response machine. I'm governed by the laws of physics exclusively.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE endlessmason@hachyderm.io

                              @phil @neurovagrant
                              HahhahahahhahhahhahhhahhHhHahjahahhahahahhahahhahahhaHhHHHhz aside from escalating the rate at which we're rendering the hahhhha planet unliveable hahHahahjhaha fucking good point man. Oh boy

                              phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                              phil@fed.bajsicki.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                              phil@fed.bajsicki.com
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                              Running Qwen3.5 on my 7900xtx eats as much power as running any video game. I have zero issue with running LLMs locally to assist with my journals/ notes. Nothing compared to a data center.

                              neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN jae@mastodon.bsd.cafeJ 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • phil@fed.bajsicki.comP phil@fed.bajsicki.com

                                @EndlessMason@hachyderm.io @neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                                Running Qwen3.5 on my 7900xtx eats as much power as running any video game. I have zero issue with running LLMs locally to assist with my journals/ notes. Nothing compared to a data center.

                                neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @phil @EndlessMason this has gotten a bit tedious for me, if y'all want to continue, please start a thread between yourselves/untag me, thanks

                                endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                                  When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                                  I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                                  the_blackwell_ninja@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  the_blackwell_ninja@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  the_blackwell_ninja@mastodon.online
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @neurovagrant We invented tech vulnerable to classic computer viruses, and social engineering too! Best of both worlds!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                                    @phil @EndlessMason this has gotten a bit tedious for me, if y'all want to continue, please start a thread between yourselves/untag me, thanks

                                    endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    endlessmason@hachyderm.io
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @neurovagrant nah I'm good

                                    neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE endlessmason@hachyderm.io

                                      @neurovagrant nah I'm good

                                      neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      @EndlessMason i hear that

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                                        When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                                        I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                                        ox1de@cyberplace.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ox1de@cyberplace.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ox1de@cyberplace.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @neurovagrant i suspect we have two weak links now, great!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                                          When I started in security, one of the prevailing attitudes was "The weakest link in the chain will always be the human."

                                          I would like to thank every LLM provider and startup for changing this paradigm by introducing a much weaker link in the chain.

                                          kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @neurovagrant

                                          :sigh: better than humans *again*!

                                          the end is nigh....

                                          (/s)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups