Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’ve been thinking about this for days.

I’ve been thinking about this for days.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
35 Posts 29 Posters 18 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

    (Via @jonathankoren )

    et@mastodon.bayernE This user is from outside of this forum
    et@mastodon.bayernE This user is from outside of this forum
    et@mastodon.bayern
    wrote last edited by
    #18

    @mhoye @i0null @jonathankoren How can I unsee this?

    i0null@infosec.exchangeI 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

      (Via @jonathankoren )

      finestructure@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      finestructure@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      finestructure@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #19

      @mhoye @jonathankoren It might be sentient

      mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • et@mastodon.bayernE et@mastodon.bayern

        @mhoye @i0null @jonathankoren How can I unsee this?

        i0null@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
        i0null@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
        i0null@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #20

        @et @mhoye @jonathankoren
        bool mark_as_unread() {
        return true;
        }

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tbortels@infosec.exchangeT tbortels@infosec.exchange

          @jonathankoren @mhoye

          The problem is its inaccuracy for smaller input sets involving low-digit-count numbers.

          Trivially fixed by hardcoding the results for 3-digit and lower input. Ship it!

          jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jonathankoren@sfba.social
          wrote last edited by
          #21

          @tbortels @mhoye https://di-mgt.com.au/primes10000.txt

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

            I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

            (Via @jonathankoren )

            ichinin@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
            ichinin@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
            ichinin@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #22

            @mhoye Algorithms like this are used as a pre-prime testing before you do the actual prime testing that requires CPU heavy computation.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

              I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

              (Via @jonathankoren )

              arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              arcaneoverflow@techhub.social
              wrote last edited by
              #23

              @mhoye @jonathankoren Snort! 🙂

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                (Via @jonathankoren )

                mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                mehrad@fosstodon.org
                wrote last edited by
                #24

                @mhoye
                @jonathankoren
                It is one of the best one-class classifier I've ever seen. Extremely efficient and the computational time doesn't grow the larger the input gets.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                  I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                  (Via @jonathankoren )

                  ingonymous@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ingonymous@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ingonymous@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #25

                  @mhoye @Nephele @jonathankoren
                  That's prime crime

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                    (Via @jonathankoren )

                    stylus@social.afront.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                    stylus@social.afront.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                    stylus@social.afront.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #26

                    @mhoye @silicatefondue @jonathankoren this class of algorithm is called the stopped clock algorithm. It joins the previously identified Monte Carlo and las Vegas algorithms.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                      (Via @jonathankoren )

                      http@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                      http@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                      http@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #27

                      @mhoye @jonathankoren If you change that to:
                      return !(x&1);
                      You have improved the probability quite a lot and still fast and won't get optimized away.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                        (Via @jonathankoren )

                        mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
                        wrote last edited by
                        #28
                        @mhoye @jonathankoren amazing, we've discovered prime numbers past 2
                        mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ jonathankoren@sfba.social

                          @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                          mschomm@bonn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mschomm@bonn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mschomm@bonn.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #29

                          @jonathankoren Is there a use case for Bogosort?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
                            @mhoye @jonathankoren amazing, we've discovered prime numbers past 2
                            mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mhoye@cosocial.ca
                            wrote last edited by
                            #30

                            @mjdxp @jonathankoren This changes everything!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • finestructure@mastodon.socialF finestructure@mastodon.social

                              @mhoye @jonathankoren It might be sentient

                              mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mhoye@cosocial.ca
                              wrote last edited by
                              #31

                              @finestructure @jonathankoren oh shit you’re right

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                (Via @jonathankoren )

                                yesbait@bsd.networkY This user is from outside of this forum
                                yesbait@bsd.networkY This user is from outside of this forum
                                yesbait@bsd.network
                                wrote last edited by
                                #32

                                @mhoye @jonathankoren can absolutely relate. Constantly trying convince my quantitative colleagues that discrete maths is different from their stochastic and AI based reasoning.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                  I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                  (Via @jonathankoren )

                                  tygerkrash@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tygerkrash@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tygerkrash@mastodon.ie
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #33

                                  @mhoye @jonathankoren thats fantastic.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                    (Via @jonathankoren )

                                    thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    thelancashireman@hostux.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #34

                                    @mhoye @jonathankoren

                                    Reminds me of another ...

                                    float sin(float x) { return x; }

                                    is remarkably accurate for a large proportion of the possible input values.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                      (Via @jonathankoren )

                                      execin@x0r.beE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      execin@x0r.beE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      execin@x0r.be
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #35

                                      @mhoye @jonathankoren
                                      And it’s O(1) too!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups