Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’ve been thinking about this for days.

I’ve been thinking about this for days.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
35 Posts 29 Posters 18 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

    (Via @jonathankoren )

    mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    mehrad@fosstodon.org
    wrote last edited by
    #24

    @mhoye
    @jonathankoren
    It is one of the best one-class classifier I've ever seen. Extremely efficient and the computational time doesn't grow the larger the input gets.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

      (Via @jonathankoren )

      ingonymous@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      ingonymous@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      ingonymous@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #25

      @mhoye @Nephele @jonathankoren
      That's prime crime

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

        (Via @jonathankoren )

        stylus@social.afront.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
        stylus@social.afront.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
        stylus@social.afront.org
        wrote last edited by
        #26

        @mhoye @silicatefondue @jonathankoren this class of algorithm is called the stopped clock algorithm. It joins the previously identified Monte Carlo and las Vegas algorithms.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

          (Via @jonathankoren )

          http@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
          http@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
          http@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #27

          @mhoye @jonathankoren If you change that to:
          return !(x&1);
          You have improved the probability quite a lot and still fast and won't get optimized away.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

            I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

            (Via @jonathankoren )

            mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
            mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
            mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
            wrote last edited by
            #28
            @mhoye @jonathankoren amazing, we've discovered prime numbers past 2
            mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ jonathankoren@sfba.social

              @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

              mschomm@bonn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mschomm@bonn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mschomm@bonn.social
              wrote last edited by
              #29

              @jonathankoren Is there a use case for Bogosort?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
                @mhoye @jonathankoren amazing, we've discovered prime numbers past 2
                mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                mhoye@cosocial.ca
                wrote last edited by
                #30

                @mjdxp @jonathankoren This changes everything!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • finestructure@mastodon.socialF finestructure@mastodon.social

                  @mhoye @jonathankoren It might be sentient

                  mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mhoye@cosocial.ca
                  wrote last edited by
                  #31

                  @finestructure @jonathankoren oh shit you’re right

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                    (Via @jonathankoren )

                    yesbait@bsd.networkY This user is from outside of this forum
                    yesbait@bsd.networkY This user is from outside of this forum
                    yesbait@bsd.network
                    wrote last edited by
                    #32

                    @mhoye @jonathankoren can absolutely relate. Constantly trying convince my quantitative colleagues that discrete maths is different from their stochastic and AI based reasoning.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                      (Via @jonathankoren )

                      tygerkrash@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tygerkrash@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tygerkrash@mastodon.ie
                      wrote last edited by
                      #33

                      @mhoye @jonathankoren thats fantastic.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                        (Via @jonathankoren )

                        thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        thelancashireman@hostux.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #34

                        @mhoye @jonathankoren

                        Reminds me of another ...

                        float sin(float x) { return x; }

                        is remarkably accurate for a large proportion of the possible input values.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                          (Via @jonathankoren )

                          execin@x0r.beE This user is from outside of this forum
                          execin@x0r.beE This user is from outside of this forum
                          execin@x0r.be
                          wrote last edited by
                          #35

                          @mhoye @jonathankoren
                          And it’s O(1) too!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups