Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’ve been thinking about this for days.

I’ve been thinking about this for days.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
35 Posts 29 Posters 18 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • drwho@masto.hackers.townD drwho@masto.hackers.town

    @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

    jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jonathankoren@sfba.social
    wrote last edited by
    #16

    @drwho @adardis @mhoye why would I care?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

      (Via @jonathankoren )

      gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
      gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
      gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place
      wrote last edited by
      #17

      @mhoye @jonathankoren are you sure about the more reliable the larger input? Prime number are weird

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

        (Via @jonathankoren )

        et@mastodon.bayernE This user is from outside of this forum
        et@mastodon.bayernE This user is from outside of this forum
        et@mastodon.bayern
        wrote last edited by
        #18

        @mhoye @i0null @jonathankoren How can I unsee this?

        i0null@infosec.exchangeI 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

          (Via @jonathankoren )

          finestructure@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          finestructure@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          finestructure@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #19

          @mhoye @jonathankoren It might be sentient

          mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • et@mastodon.bayernE et@mastodon.bayern

            @mhoye @i0null @jonathankoren How can I unsee this?

            i0null@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
            i0null@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
            i0null@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #20

            @et @mhoye @jonathankoren
            bool mark_as_unread() {
            return true;
            }

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tbortels@infosec.exchangeT tbortels@infosec.exchange

              @jonathankoren @mhoye

              The problem is its inaccuracy for smaller input sets involving low-digit-count numbers.

              Trivially fixed by hardcoding the results for 3-digit and lower input. Ship it!

              jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jonathankoren@sfba.social
              wrote last edited by
              #21

              @tbortels @mhoye https://di-mgt.com.au/primes10000.txt

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                (Via @jonathankoren )

                ichinin@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                ichinin@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                ichinin@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #22

                @mhoye Algorithms like this are used as a pre-prime testing before you do the actual prime testing that requires CPU heavy computation.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                  I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                  (Via @jonathankoren )

                  arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  arcaneoverflow@techhub.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #23

                  @mhoye @jonathankoren Snort! 🙂

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                    (Via @jonathankoren )

                    mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mehrad@fosstodon.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #24

                    @mhoye
                    @jonathankoren
                    It is one of the best one-class classifier I've ever seen. Extremely efficient and the computational time doesn't grow the larger the input gets.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                      (Via @jonathankoren )

                      ingonymous@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                      ingonymous@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                      ingonymous@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #25

                      @mhoye @Nephele @jonathankoren
                      That's prime crime

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                        (Via @jonathankoren )

                        stylus@social.afront.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stylus@social.afront.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stylus@social.afront.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #26

                        @mhoye @silicatefondue @jonathankoren this class of algorithm is called the stopped clock algorithm. It joins the previously identified Monte Carlo and las Vegas algorithms.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                          (Via @jonathankoren )

                          http@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                          http@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                          http@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #27

                          @mhoye @jonathankoren If you change that to:
                          return !(x&1);
                          You have improved the probability quite a lot and still fast and won't get optimized away.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                            I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                            (Via @jonathankoren )

                            mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
                            wrote last edited by
                            #28
                            @mhoye @jonathankoren amazing, we've discovered prime numbers past 2
                            mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ jonathankoren@sfba.social

                              @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                              mschomm@bonn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mschomm@bonn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mschomm@bonn.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #29

                              @jonathankoren Is there a use case for Bogosort?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
                                @mhoye @jonathankoren amazing, we've discovered prime numbers past 2
                                mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mhoye@cosocial.ca
                                wrote last edited by
                                #30

                                @mjdxp @jonathankoren This changes everything!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • finestructure@mastodon.socialF finestructure@mastodon.social

                                  @mhoye @jonathankoren It might be sentient

                                  mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mhoye@cosocial.ca
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #31

                                  @finestructure @jonathankoren oh shit you’re right

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                    (Via @jonathankoren )

                                    yesbait@bsd.networkY This user is from outside of this forum
                                    yesbait@bsd.networkY This user is from outside of this forum
                                    yesbait@bsd.network
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #32

                                    @mhoye @jonathankoren can absolutely relate. Constantly trying convince my quantitative colleagues that discrete maths is different from their stochastic and AI based reasoning.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                      (Via @jonathankoren )

                                      tygerkrash@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tygerkrash@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tygerkrash@mastodon.ie
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #33

                                      @mhoye @jonathankoren thats fantastic.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                        (Via @jonathankoren )

                                        thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        thelancashireman@hostux.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #34

                                        @mhoye @jonathankoren

                                        Reminds me of another ...

                                        float sin(float x) { return x; }

                                        is remarkably accurate for a large proportion of the possible input values.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                          (Via @jonathankoren )

                                          execin@x0r.beE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          execin@x0r.beE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          execin@x0r.be
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #35

                                          @mhoye @jonathankoren
                                          And it’s O(1) too!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups