Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’ve been thinking about this for days.

I’ve been thinking about this for days.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
35 Posts 29 Posters 18 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

    (Via @jonathankoren )

    cubeos@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
    cubeos@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
    cubeos@hachyderm.io
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    @mhoye @jonathankoren It also provides the script for a math party trick: "Tell me any 100 digit number and I will tell you if it's prime!'

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • drwho@masto.hackers.townD drwho@masto.hackers.town

      @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

      jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jonathankoren@sfba.social
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      @drwho @adardis @mhoye why would I care?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

        (Via @jonathankoren )

        gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
        gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
        gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        @mhoye @jonathankoren are you sure about the more reliable the larger input? Prime number are weird

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

          (Via @jonathankoren )

          et@mastodon.bayernE This user is from outside of this forum
          et@mastodon.bayernE This user is from outside of this forum
          et@mastodon.bayern
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @mhoye @i0null @jonathankoren How can I unsee this?

          i0null@infosec.exchangeI 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

            I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

            (Via @jonathankoren )

            finestructure@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            finestructure@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            finestructure@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @mhoye @jonathankoren It might be sentient

            mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • et@mastodon.bayernE et@mastodon.bayern

              @mhoye @i0null @jonathankoren How can I unsee this?

              i0null@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
              i0null@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
              i0null@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @et @mhoye @jonathankoren
              bool mark_as_unread() {
              return true;
              }

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tbortels@infosec.exchangeT tbortels@infosec.exchange

                @jonathankoren @mhoye

                The problem is its inaccuracy for smaller input sets involving low-digit-count numbers.

                Trivially fixed by hardcoding the results for 3-digit and lower input. Ship it!

                jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jonathankoren@sfba.social
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @tbortels @mhoye https://di-mgt.com.au/primes10000.txt

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                  I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                  (Via @jonathankoren )

                  ichinin@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ichinin@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ichinin@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @mhoye Algorithms like this are used as a pre-prime testing before you do the actual prime testing that requires CPU heavy computation.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                    (Via @jonathankoren )

                    arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    arcaneoverflow@techhub.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @mhoye @jonathankoren Snort! 🙂

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                      (Via @jonathankoren )

                      mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mehrad@fosstodon.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @mhoye
                      @jonathankoren
                      It is one of the best one-class classifier I've ever seen. Extremely efficient and the computational time doesn't grow the larger the input gets.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                        (Via @jonathankoren )

                        ingonymous@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ingonymous@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ingonymous@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @mhoye @Nephele @jonathankoren
                        That's prime crime

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                          (Via @jonathankoren )

                          stylus@social.afront.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stylus@social.afront.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stylus@social.afront.org
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          @mhoye @silicatefondue @jonathankoren this class of algorithm is called the stopped clock algorithm. It joins the previously identified Monte Carlo and las Vegas algorithms.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                            I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                            (Via @jonathankoren )

                            http@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                            http@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                            http@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #27

                            @mhoye @jonathankoren If you change that to:
                            return !(x&1);
                            You have improved the probability quite a lot and still fast and won't get optimized away.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                              I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                              (Via @jonathankoren )

                              mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
                              wrote last edited by
                              #28
                              @mhoye @jonathankoren amazing, we've discovered prime numbers past 2
                              mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ jonathankoren@sfba.social

                                @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                                mschomm@bonn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mschomm@bonn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mschomm@bonn.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #29

                                @jonathankoren Is there a use case for Bogosort?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
                                  @mhoye @jonathankoren amazing, we've discovered prime numbers past 2
                                  mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mhoye@cosocial.ca
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #30

                                  @mjdxp @jonathankoren This changes everything!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • finestructure@mastodon.socialF finestructure@mastodon.social

                                    @mhoye @jonathankoren It might be sentient

                                    mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mhoye@cosocial.ca
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #31

                                    @finestructure @jonathankoren oh shit you’re right

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                      (Via @jonathankoren )

                                      yesbait@bsd.networkY This user is from outside of this forum
                                      yesbait@bsd.networkY This user is from outside of this forum
                                      yesbait@bsd.network
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #32

                                      @mhoye @jonathankoren can absolutely relate. Constantly trying convince my quantitative colleagues that discrete maths is different from their stochastic and AI based reasoning.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                        (Via @jonathankoren )

                                        tygerkrash@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tygerkrash@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tygerkrash@mastodon.ie
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #33

                                        @mhoye @jonathankoren thats fantastic.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                          (Via @jonathankoren )

                                          thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          thelancashireman@hostux.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #34

                                          @mhoye @jonathankoren

                                          Reminds me of another ...

                                          float sin(float x) { return x; }

                                          is remarkably accurate for a large proportion of the possible input values.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups