So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:
-
So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:
Mozilla: Opposed
WebKit: Opposed
Microsoft: Several concerns
W3C TAG: Several concerns
Developers: Mostly negativeChrome: Ships anyway.
A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'
-
So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:
Mozilla: Opposed
WebKit: Opposed
Microsoft: Several concerns
W3C TAG: Several concerns
Developers: Mostly negativeChrome: Ships anyway.
A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'
We now have an 'open web API' that requires you to comply with Google's "terms of use". I know many at Chrome disagree with this, but feel they can't say anything publicly out of fear of internal retribution. https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1213#issuecomment-4347988313
-
So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:
Mozilla: Opposed
WebKit: Opposed
Microsoft: Several concerns
W3C TAG: Several concerns
Developers: Mostly negativeChrome: Ships anyway.
A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'
@jaffathecake what are we as developers supposed to do here? We have literally no say in this whatsoever.
It’s a genuine question, what are we supposed to? Because I subjectively feel like we could have done something maybe 10 years ago, but now…?
-
@jaffathecake what are we as developers supposed to do here? We have literally no say in this whatsoever.
It’s a genuine question, what are we supposed to? Because I subjectively feel like we could have done something maybe 10 years ago, but now…?
@nachtfunke oh, Google had you all down as "strongly supportive" https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/iR6R7-nQeHI/m/gN4iEGEdAQAJ
-
@jaffathecake what are we as developers supposed to do here? We have literally no say in this whatsoever.
It’s a genuine question, what are we supposed to? Because I subjectively feel like we could have done something maybe 10 years ago, but now…?
@nachtfunke @jaffathecake Not sure if this really matters at this point either but there is a web-platform-dx/developer-signals repo for this that few seem to be aware of. Maybe this is a better place to be collecting general developer sentiment: https://github.com/web-platform-dx/developer-signals/issues/556
-
@nachtfunke oh, Google had you all down as "strongly supportive" https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/iR6R7-nQeHI/m/gN4iEGEdAQAJ
@jaffathecake Honestly, maybe the reality is just that we developers nowadays are positioned too much by business practices that the majority is indeed strongly supportive. I don’t know anymore.
I am tired of this all. When you’re sounding the alarm early you’re being negative and when you criticize it when it’s a manifest problem then you’re being called complicit.
I don’t know anymore. Im a modern Luddite at this point
-
@jaffathecake what are we as developers supposed to do here? We have literally no say in this whatsoever.
It’s a genuine question, what are we supposed to? Because I subjectively feel like we could have done something maybe 10 years ago, but now…?
@nachtfunke @jaffathecake I think the big power developers do still hold is to just not use this API. The web isn't cast in stone (as much as people may think it is), if the usage stays low enough there's a chance it might unship in years to come, or at least go through changes to make others more onboard (idk if that's feasible here though).
-
@jaffathecake Honestly, maybe the reality is just that we developers nowadays are positioned too much by business practices that the majority is indeed strongly supportive. I don’t know anymore.
I am tired of this all. When you’re sounding the alarm early you’re being negative and when you criticize it when it’s a manifest problem then you’re being called complicit.
I don’t know anymore. Im a modern Luddite at this point
@nachtfunke @jaffathecake
My conclusion from the earlier browser wars: history unfortunately repeats itself, and too much market dominance is harmful to platform-independent web standards. -
@nachtfunke @jaffathecake
My conclusion from the earlier browser wars: history unfortunately repeats itself, and too much market dominance is harmful to platform-independent web standards.@af yes indeed. I would argue that market dynamics shouldn't have any influence on the infrastructure of modern human connection.
-
@nachtfunke oh, Google had you all down as "strongly supportive" https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/iR6R7-nQeHI/m/gN4iEGEdAQAJ
@jaffathecake @nachtfunke I loved that one when I read it the other day
The strongly supportive was one comment in a github issue, a blog that doesn't exist anymore, and another blog post. Overwhelming interest, overwhelming support! 
-
So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:
Mozilla: Opposed
WebKit: Opposed
Microsoft: Several concerns
W3C TAG: Several concerns
Developers: Mostly negativeChrome: Ships anyway.
A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'
@jaffathecake
Google / Alphabet needs to have Android & Chrome divested from them and them kicked out of everything.They are an Advertising agency that cares nothing about local laws or people.
Somel finance from Eric Schmidt, who was CEO for a while. Hides from public eye and hardly mentioned in history of Google. He turned it into an advertising agency fuelled by surveillance.
Google Analytics and Recaptcha are evil tools they use that no-one should deploy, or any other Google service. -
@nachtfunke oh, Google had you all down as "strongly supportive" https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/iR6R7-nQeHI/m/gN4iEGEdAQAJ
@jaffathecake Maybe there's some definition of "developers" in the spec process, but I think it is problematic to consider "developers" to be one giant mass.
I agree with you - this is a bad API. But especially given the topic, I think this process self-selects for the most vocal, and I can imagine there are loads of developers out there that are genuinely supportive of an API like this.
-
So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:
Mozilla: Opposed
WebKit: Opposed
Microsoft: Several concerns
W3C TAG: Several concerns
Developers: Mostly negativeChrome: Ships anyway.
A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'
@jaffathecake agents in your very browsers
-
So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:
Mozilla: Opposed
WebKit: Opposed
Microsoft: Several concerns
W3C TAG: Several concerns
Developers: Mostly negativeChrome: Ships anyway.
A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'
@jaffathecake I've been saying chrome is the new ie for years...
-
@jaffathecake Maybe there's some definition of "developers" in the spec process, but I think it is problematic to consider "developers" to be one giant mass.
I agree with you - this is a bad API. But especially given the topic, I think this process self-selects for the most vocal, and I can imagine there are loads of developers out there that are genuinely supportive of an API like this.
@joshhunt if there is then they failed to show it. They posted a couple of links, including a survey about something else.
-
So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:
Mozilla: Opposed
WebKit: Opposed
Microsoft: Several concerns
W3C TAG: Several concerns
Developers: Mostly negativeChrome: Ships anyway.
A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'
Alternatives are available.
https://www.firefox.com -
Alternatives are available.
https://www.firefox.com@bit I switched to it last year and not had any issues. It's a great alternative if your tired of all the nonsense Chrome keeps rolling out.
-
@jaffathecake
Google / Alphabet needs to have Android & Chrome divested from them and them kicked out of everything.They are an Advertising agency that cares nothing about local laws or people.
Somel finance from Eric Schmidt, who was CEO for a while. Hides from public eye and hardly mentioned in history of Google. He turned it into an advertising agency fuelled by surveillance.
Google Analytics and Recaptcha are evil tools they use that no-one should deploy, or any other Google service.@jaffathecake
Amazon, Google, Apple, Musk etc show the huge flaw in allowing shares as collateral for loans as "payment" for a takeover, often described as a merger.Obscene Capitalism.
Musk is rich by background, luck & stupidity of other people, partly Peter Thiel.
Paid Tesla to claim he was a founder.
-
So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API:
Mozilla: Opposed
WebKit: Opposed
Microsoft: Several concerns
W3C TAG: Several concerns
Developers: Mostly negativeChrome: Ships anyway.
A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'
@jaffathecake Internal politics trumps external reactions every time.
I am currently using waterfox, a Clean fork of Firefox ( no AI features, kill switch or no )
-
@jaffathecake @nachtfunke I loved that one when I read it the other day
The strongly supportive was one comment in a github issue, a blog that doesn't exist anymore, and another blog post. Overwhelming interest, overwhelming support! 
@phl @jaffathecake @nachtfunke
Ya know they say threes a crowd
