Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. google is broken...

google is broken...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
26 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

    @matt I mean I guess its working, I just googled a bunch of things cause of how ridiculously wrong all the answers are, so maybe thats their game

    matt@oslo.townM This user is from outside of this forum
    matt@oslo.townM This user is from outside of this forum
    matt@oslo.town
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    @liaizon That's right! More time in Google products, eyeballing the ads they baked into responses!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jackperkins@post.lurk.orgJ jackperkins@post.lurk.org

      @liaizon alsp lol this costs like a dollar a pop for them

      liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
      liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
      liaizon@social.wake.st
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      @jackperkins naaaa, they are not using their good models for this, they are using their cheapest shit for it, I would assume more like 000000.1cent per query

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

        @oppen who needs to know anything when you can just guess the answer based on a probability that is right a good amount of the time!?

        oppen@merveilles.townO This user is from outside of this forum
        oppen@merveilles.townO This user is from outside of this forum
        oppen@merveilles.town
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        @liaizon In $dayjob we have an elusive bug in our impl. of Android's MediaSession/ExoPlayer. Having previously spent days trying to fix it I thought I'd try the Claude account we're testing, let's see if the AI can find the problem... it's very very confidentlly identified the issue in 3 or 4 places so far, none of the fixes it's added have worked at all, but the language it uses is so matter of fact. It's a user-facing issue and the in-app radio playback locks up until restart, so big problem when it happens, the 1st time Claude said it knew what the issue was I was momentarily very happy...

        liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • oppen@merveilles.townO oppen@merveilles.town

          @liaizon In $dayjob we have an elusive bug in our impl. of Android's MediaSession/ExoPlayer. Having previously spent days trying to fix it I thought I'd try the Claude account we're testing, let's see if the AI can find the problem... it's very very confidentlly identified the issue in 3 or 4 places so far, none of the fixes it's added have worked at all, but the language it uses is so matter of fact. It's a user-facing issue and the in-app radio playback locks up until restart, so big problem when it happens, the 1st time Claude said it knew what the issue was I was momentarily very happy...

          liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
          liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
          liaizon@social.wake.st
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @oppen it so often being confidently wrong is one of the most annoying aspects of this jank for sure. I think many people would respond better to a bunch more of "I don't know!" responses littered in (it could probably just be randomized) just to have less certainty...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

            amazing how jank this all is

            Link Preview Image
            despens@post.lurk.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
            despens@post.lurk.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
            despens@post.lurk.org
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            @liaizon Perfect comedy! Really digging the references on this one:

            Link Preview Image
            liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • despens@post.lurk.orgD despens@post.lurk.org

              @liaizon Perfect comedy! Really digging the references on this one:

              Link Preview Image
              liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
              liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
              liaizon@social.wake.st
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @despens its amazing to see how everytime google uses citations they are basically randomly added later. like it makes up some shit, then "cites" it by just showing a link that contains a single word of your search.

              despens@post.lurk.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                @despens its amazing to see how everytime google uses citations they are basically randomly added later. like it makes up some shit, then "cites" it by just showing a link that contains a single word of your search.

                despens@post.lurk.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                despens@post.lurk.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                despens@post.lurk.org
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @liaizon 👆 This post of yours is actually a prompt that forms the foundation of a billion dollar business

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                  amazing how jank this all is

                  Link Preview Image
                  gub@framapiaf.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gub@framapiaf.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gub@framapiaf.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @liaizon
                  The correct answer is 3.
                  "Rassemblement National"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                    amazing how jank this all is

                    Link Preview Image
                    fluchtkapsel@nerdculture.deF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fluchtkapsel@nerdculture.deF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fluchtkapsel@nerdculture.de
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    @liaizon missed opportunity, Google, missed opportunity.

                    Link Preview Image
                    liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • fluchtkapsel@nerdculture.deF fluchtkapsel@nerdculture.de

                      @liaizon missed opportunity, Google, missed opportunity.

                      Link Preview Image
                      liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                      liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                      liaizon@social.wake.st
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @fluchtkapsel its impressive how consistent this "bug" is, like they have to realize it by now. I wonder what the internal Google chat looksike atm

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                        amazing how jank this all is

                        Link Preview Image
                        liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                        liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                        liaizon@social.wake.st
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        someone at google is still alive!

                        Link Preview Image
                        s_ol@merveilles.townS 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                          someone at google is still alive!

                          Link Preview Image
                          s_ol@merveilles.townS This user is from outside of this forum
                          s_ol@merveilles.townS This user is from outside of this forum
                          s_ol@merveilles.town
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          @liaizon
                          the sad thing is that they can (and might) fix this, but the fix will be one of these two:

                          1. have the model run much longer, then have another model read that output and summarize: "reasoning" (aka maximize resource burning)
                          2. give the AI a traditionally-implemented "count characters in word" tool (address the symptom, aka admit defeat.

                          liaizon@social.wake.stL s_ol@merveilles.townS mntmn@mastodon.socialM 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • s_ol@merveilles.townS s_ol@merveilles.town

                            @liaizon
                            the sad thing is that they can (and might) fix this, but the fix will be one of these two:

                            1. have the model run much longer, then have another model read that output and summarize: "reasoning" (aka maximize resource burning)
                            2. give the AI a traditionally-implemented "count characters in word" tool (address the symptom, aka admit defeat.

                            liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                            liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                            liaizon@social.wake.st
                            wrote last edited by
                            #22

                            @s_ol it should be doing tool calls anyway for many questions. Like Google search used to do basic math and equations inline without searching.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • s_ol@merveilles.townS s_ol@merveilles.town

                              @liaizon
                              the sad thing is that they can (and might) fix this, but the fix will be one of these two:

                              1. have the model run much longer, then have another model read that output and summarize: "reasoning" (aka maximize resource burning)
                              2. give the AI a traditionally-implemented "count characters in word" tool (address the symptom, aka admit defeat.

                              s_ol@merveilles.townS This user is from outside of this forum
                              s_ol@merveilles.townS This user is from outside of this forum
                              s_ol@merveilles.town
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              @liaizon
                              i was under the impression that other general-purpose models have solved this and would've guessed they implemented option 2 but actually chatgpt is still confidently wrong (now with sources!)

                              Link Preview Image
                              liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • s_ol@merveilles.townS s_ol@merveilles.town

                                @liaizon
                                i was under the impression that other general-purpose models have solved this and would've guessed they implemented option 2 but actually chatgpt is still confidently wrong (now with sources!)

                                Link Preview Image
                                liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                liaizon@social.wake.st
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                @s_ol I love how all these companies are completely ruining the concept of souces and citations

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • s_ol@merveilles.townS s_ol@merveilles.town

                                  @liaizon
                                  the sad thing is that they can (and might) fix this, but the fix will be one of these two:

                                  1. have the model run much longer, then have another model read that output and summarize: "reasoning" (aka maximize resource burning)
                                  2. give the AI a traditionally-implemented "count characters in word" tool (address the symptom, aka admit defeat.

                                  mntmn@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mntmn@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mntmn@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @s_ol @liaizon last night when i tried exactly this, it was already using python to count chars, but only sometimes. when i asked "how many p in paraphernalia" it said 3. so it's just very random

                                  liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mntmn@mastodon.socialM mntmn@mastodon.social

                                    @s_ol @liaizon last night when i tried exactly this, it was already using python to count chars, but only sometimes. when i asked "how many p in paraphernalia" it said 3. so it's just very random

                                    liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    liaizon@social.wake.st
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @mntmn @s_ol how many pythons does it take to change a lightbulb?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • dantescanline@autonomous.zoneD dantescanline@autonomous.zone shared this topic
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups