Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. google is broken...

google is broken...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
26 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

    amazing how jank this all is

    Link Preview Image
    despens@post.lurk.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
    despens@post.lurk.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
    despens@post.lurk.org
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @liaizon Perfect comedy! Really digging the references on this one:

    Link Preview Image
    liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • despens@post.lurk.orgD despens@post.lurk.org

      @liaizon Perfect comedy! Really digging the references on this one:

      Link Preview Image
      liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
      liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
      liaizon@social.wake.st
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      @despens its amazing to see how everytime google uses citations they are basically randomly added later. like it makes up some shit, then "cites" it by just showing a link that contains a single word of your search.

      despens@post.lurk.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

        @despens its amazing to see how everytime google uses citations they are basically randomly added later. like it makes up some shit, then "cites" it by just showing a link that contains a single word of your search.

        despens@post.lurk.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
        despens@post.lurk.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
        despens@post.lurk.org
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @liaizon ๐Ÿ‘† This post of yours is actually a prompt that forms the foundation of a billion dollar business

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

          amazing how jank this all is

          Link Preview Image
          gub@framapiaf.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
          gub@framapiaf.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
          gub@framapiaf.org
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @liaizon
          The correct answer is 3.
          "Rassemblement National"

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

            amazing how jank this all is

            Link Preview Image
            fluchtkapsel@nerdculture.deF This user is from outside of this forum
            fluchtkapsel@nerdculture.deF This user is from outside of this forum
            fluchtkapsel@nerdculture.de
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @liaizon missed opportunity, Google, missed opportunity.

            Link Preview Image
            liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • fluchtkapsel@nerdculture.deF fluchtkapsel@nerdculture.de

              @liaizon missed opportunity, Google, missed opportunity.

              Link Preview Image
              liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
              liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
              liaizon@social.wake.st
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @fluchtkapsel its impressive how consistent this "bug" is, like they have to realize it by now. I wonder what the internal Google chat looksike atm

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                amazing how jank this all is

                Link Preview Image
                liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                liaizon@social.wake.st
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                someone at google is still alive!

                Link Preview Image
                s_ol@merveilles.townS 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                  someone at google is still alive!

                  Link Preview Image
                  s_ol@merveilles.townS This user is from outside of this forum
                  s_ol@merveilles.townS This user is from outside of this forum
                  s_ol@merveilles.town
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  @liaizon
                  the sad thing is that they can (and might) fix this, but the fix will be one of these two:

                  1. have the model run much longer, then have another model read that output and summarize: "reasoning" (aka maximize resource burning)
                  2. give the AI a traditionally-implemented "count characters in word" tool (address the symptom, aka admit defeat.

                  liaizon@social.wake.stL s_ol@merveilles.townS mntmn@mastodon.socialM 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • s_ol@merveilles.townS s_ol@merveilles.town

                    @liaizon
                    the sad thing is that they can (and might) fix this, but the fix will be one of these two:

                    1. have the model run much longer, then have another model read that output and summarize: "reasoning" (aka maximize resource burning)
                    2. give the AI a traditionally-implemented "count characters in word" tool (address the symptom, aka admit defeat.

                    liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                    liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                    liaizon@social.wake.st
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @s_ol it should be doing tool calls anyway for many questions. Like Google search used to do basic math and equations inline without searching.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • s_ol@merveilles.townS s_ol@merveilles.town

                      @liaizon
                      the sad thing is that they can (and might) fix this, but the fix will be one of these two:

                      1. have the model run much longer, then have another model read that output and summarize: "reasoning" (aka maximize resource burning)
                      2. give the AI a traditionally-implemented "count characters in word" tool (address the symptom, aka admit defeat.

                      s_ol@merveilles.townS This user is from outside of this forum
                      s_ol@merveilles.townS This user is from outside of this forum
                      s_ol@merveilles.town
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @liaizon
                      i was under the impression that other general-purpose models have solved this and would've guessed they implemented option 2 but actually chatgpt is still confidently wrong (now with sources!)

                      Link Preview Image
                      liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • s_ol@merveilles.townS s_ol@merveilles.town

                        @liaizon
                        i was under the impression that other general-purpose models have solved this and would've guessed they implemented option 2 but actually chatgpt is still confidently wrong (now with sources!)

                        Link Preview Image
                        liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                        liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                        liaizon@social.wake.st
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @s_ol I love how all these companies are completely ruining the concept of souces and citations

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • s_ol@merveilles.townS s_ol@merveilles.town

                          @liaizon
                          the sad thing is that they can (and might) fix this, but the fix will be one of these two:

                          1. have the model run much longer, then have another model read that output and summarize: "reasoning" (aka maximize resource burning)
                          2. give the AI a traditionally-implemented "count characters in word" tool (address the symptom, aka admit defeat.

                          mntmn@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mntmn@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mntmn@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @s_ol @liaizon last night when i tried exactly this, it was already using python to count chars, but only sometimes. when i asked "how many p in paraphernalia" it said 3. so it's just very random

                          liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mntmn@mastodon.socialM mntmn@mastodon.social

                            @s_ol @liaizon last night when i tried exactly this, it was already using python to count chars, but only sometimes. when i asked "how many p in paraphernalia" it said 3. so it's just very random

                            liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                            liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                            liaizon@social.wake.st
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            @mntmn @s_ol how many pythons does it take to change a lightbulb?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dantescanline@autonomous.zoneD dantescanline@autonomous.zone shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups