Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
billc22
48 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mokhtarstork@zirk.usM mokhtarstork@zirk.us

    @OpenMediaOrg What the reason behind this move by the Canadian government?

    mayintoronto@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
    mayintoronto@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
    mayintoronto@beige.party
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    @MokhtarStork @OpenMediaOrg The current federal government is really bought into the whole surveillance military industrial complex.

    snowyca@social.vivaldi.netS zazzoo@mstdn.caZ 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • openmediaorg@mastodon.socialO openmediaorg@mastodon.social

      BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

      This should be our final alarm bell: we can have digital privacy or we can have legislation this broad and broken, not both!

      Link Preview Image
      Signal warns it would pull out of Canada if made to comply with lawful access bill

      Secure messaging service says it will not weaken its encryption, privacy safeguards for government

      favicon

      The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

      walruths@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
      walruths@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
      walruths@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      @OpenMediaOrg

      Obligatory XMPP mention, awaiting regulatory response.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dansup@mastodon.socialD dansup@mastodon.social shared this topic
      • mayintoronto@beige.partyM mayintoronto@beige.party

        @MokhtarStork @OpenMediaOrg The current federal government is really bought into the whole surveillance military industrial complex.

        snowyca@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
        snowyca@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
        snowyca@social.vivaldi.net
        wrote last edited by
        #9

        @mayintoronto @MokhtarStork @OpenMediaOrg

        And Trump's Patriot Act.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • openmediaorg@mastodon.socialO openmediaorg@mastodon.social

          BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

          This should be our final alarm bell: we can have digital privacy or we can have legislation this broad and broken, not both!

          Link Preview Image
          Signal warns it would pull out of Canada if made to comply with lawful access bill

          Secure messaging service says it will not weaken its encryption, privacy safeguards for government

          favicon

          The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

          patatas@social.patatas.caP This user is from outside of this forum
          patatas@social.patatas.caP This user is from outside of this forum
          patatas@social.patatas.ca
          wrote last edited by
          #10

          @OpenMediaOrg@mastodon.social kinda curious if @tailscale@hachyderm.io has also said anything about this - seems like it would be bad for their business but idk

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mokhtarstork@zirk.usM mokhtarstork@zirk.us

            @OpenMediaOrg What the reason behind this move by the Canadian government?

            gokushrm@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gokushrm@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gokushrm@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            @MokhtarStork @OpenMediaOrg because they are stupid

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mayintoronto@beige.partyM mayintoronto@beige.party

              @MokhtarStork @OpenMediaOrg The current federal government is really bought into the whole surveillance military industrial complex.

              zazzoo@mstdn.caZ This user is from outside of this forum
              zazzoo@mstdn.caZ This user is from outside of this forum
              zazzoo@mstdn.ca
              wrote last edited by
              #12

              @mayintoronto @MokhtarStork @OpenMediaOrg Apart from that, I have no idea what problem they're claiming to be solving. Usually crap like this is in response to something, but it seems like they just feel like it for no reason other than to do Orwell.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • riotmuffin@ni.hil.istR riotmuffin@ni.hil.ist

                @Mannanan well that’s great news, because it doesn’t require a phone number anymore

                @OpenMediaOrg

                yourgodsatan@mstdn.partyY This user is from outside of this forum
                yourgodsatan@mstdn.partyY This user is from outside of this forum
                yourgodsatan@mstdn.party
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                @riotmuffin

                @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg

                Signal's official support page still seems to say that a phone number is required to register an account

                Just a moment...

                favicon

                (support.signal.org)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • really_idk@mastodon.socialR really_idk@mastodon.social

                  @OpenMediaOrg will Signal also geofence access to apk?

                  wiredfire@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                  wiredfire@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                  wiredfire@mstdn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #14

                  @really_idk @OpenMediaOrg unlikely but I’d expect they *would* geofence the service. Essentially blocking their service from operating anywhere with a Canadian IP. And yes you’d likely be able to work around that with a decent VPN, but that’s not what non-technical folk are likely to do.

                  landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                  • openmediaorg@mastodon.socialO openmediaorg@mastodon.social

                    BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

                    This should be our final alarm bell: we can have digital privacy or we can have legislation this broad and broken, not both!

                    Link Preview Image
                    Signal warns it would pull out of Canada if made to comply with lawful access bill

                    Secure messaging service says it will not weaken its encryption, privacy safeguards for government

                    favicon

                    The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

                    kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kkarhan@c.im
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    @OpenMediaOrg this is just #Signal chasing #Clout because they never left a juristiction to this point. Neither "P.R." #China nor #Russia nor #KSA nor Iran, and all of those demand even more #BulkAccess…

                    - Because Signal is a #HoneyPot collecting #PII like the #PhoneNumbers of their users.

                    - The only reason it's not beibg shut down like #EncroChat, #SkyECC and others is because it's the same Modi Operandi as #ANØM aka. #OperationIronside aka. #OperationTrøjanShield.

                    If the #Trump Regime of the #USA disliked Signal, it could kill it with a single EO due to it's hard #LockIn on #aws and lack of decentralization!

                    N 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • really_idk@mastodon.socialR really_idk@mastodon.social

                      @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg Signal doesn’t require a phone number.

                      harib_murshidi@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                      harib_murshidi@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                      harib_murshidi@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @really_idk @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg Huh ?! When did that happen ??! You sign up on the app using your mobike phone number (as in Whatscrapp, Telegram) unlike other alternatives like Jami or Session 🤔

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mannanan@mas.toM mannanan@mas.to

                        @OpenMediaOrg

                        As long as Signal requires a phone number to use, your privacy is already compromised.

                        misusecase@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        misusecase@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        misusecase@twit.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #17

                        @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg This is such a tired, thought-terminating cliche that I’ve seen a hundred times on here.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • kkarhan@c.imK kkarhan@c.im

                          @OpenMediaOrg this is just #Signal chasing #Clout because they never left a juristiction to this point. Neither "P.R." #China nor #Russia nor #KSA nor Iran, and all of those demand even more #BulkAccess…

                          - Because Signal is a #HoneyPot collecting #PII like the #PhoneNumbers of their users.

                          - The only reason it's not beibg shut down like #EncroChat, #SkyECC and others is because it's the same Modi Operandi as #ANØM aka. #OperationIronside aka. #OperationTrøjanShield.

                          If the #Trump Regime of the #USA disliked Signal, it could kill it with a single EO due to it's hard #LockIn on #aws and lack of decentralization!

                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          neutronstar@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #18

                          @kkarhan @OpenMediaOrg
                          You really like hashtags don’t you?
                          But yeah, we really need to escape these centralised lock-in platforms for decentralised options. I’m personally rooting for Matrix as my main alternative. SimpleX is also a good option in my opinion, as of today. They seem to allow decentralisation too, unlike Signal.

                          kkarhan@c.imK 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • really_idk@mastodon.socialR really_idk@mastodon.social

                            @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg Signal doesn’t require a phone number.

                            alextecplayz@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alextecplayz@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alextecplayz@techhub.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #19

                            @really_idk @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg it does require a phone number, you need one to register and/or move your Signal account.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • openmediaorg@mastodon.socialO openmediaorg@mastodon.social

                              BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

                              This should be our final alarm bell: we can have digital privacy or we can have legislation this broad and broken, not both!

                              Link Preview Image
                              Signal warns it would pull out of Canada if made to comply with lawful access bill

                              Secure messaging service says it will not weaken its encryption, privacy safeguards for government

                              favicon

                              The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

                              zed@mstdn.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zed@mstdn.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zed@mstdn.party
                              wrote last edited by
                              #20

                              @OpenMediaOrg bad on Canada, but also bad on signal for being built in a way where they can decide which countries get access. It should run on an open source backend that can be run on your own servers if you like.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N neutronstar@infosec.exchange

                                @kkarhan @OpenMediaOrg
                                You really like hashtags don’t you?
                                But yeah, we really need to escape these centralised lock-in platforms for decentralised options. I’m personally rooting for Matrix as my main alternative. SimpleX is also a good option in my opinion, as of today. They seem to allow decentralisation too, unlike Signal.

                                kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kkarhan@c.im
                                wrote last edited by
                                #21

                                @neutronstar @OpenMediaOrg Personally, I stick with #XMPP+#OMEMO because it works, there are tons of servers & providers (including paid-for ones that are pro-privacy, like @monocles !) and because it's a mature, #MultiVendor & #MultiProvider solution that pairs nicely with @torproject / #Tor.

                                - I've been using XMPP over Tor (with @guardianproject #Orbot) for the last 15+ years (Cuz #EDGEland has shitty mobile networks!) and it's only gotten better over time!

                                Maybe I need to make a whole writeup on that part if not do a tutorial session for people to listen & watch to.

                                - Cuz it's neither difficult nor complex once one knows what to do. And if I can onboard some frightened #TechIlliterate stuck in a besieged city with a craptastic phone on an extremely slow connection, then it should be easy for calm #Normies in their comfy homes...

                                N 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • kkarhan@c.imK kkarhan@c.im

                                  @neutronstar @OpenMediaOrg Personally, I stick with #XMPP+#OMEMO because it works, there are tons of servers & providers (including paid-for ones that are pro-privacy, like @monocles !) and because it's a mature, #MultiVendor & #MultiProvider solution that pairs nicely with @torproject / #Tor.

                                  - I've been using XMPP over Tor (with @guardianproject #Orbot) for the last 15+ years (Cuz #EDGEland has shitty mobile networks!) and it's only gotten better over time!

                                  Maybe I need to make a whole writeup on that part if not do a tutorial session for people to listen & watch to.

                                  - Cuz it's neither difficult nor complex once one knows what to do. And if I can onboard some frightened #TechIlliterate stuck in a besieged city with a craptastic phone on an extremely slow connection, then it should be easy for calm #Normies in their comfy homes...

                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  neutronstar@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #22

                                  @kkarhan @OpenMediaOrg @monocles @torproject @guardianproject
                                  Yeah, can’t really argue against using what is tried and true

                                  kkarhan@c.imK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N neutronstar@infosec.exchange

                                    @kkarhan @OpenMediaOrg @monocles @torproject @guardianproject
                                    Yeah, can’t really argue against using what is tried and true

                                    kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kkarhan@c.im
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #23

                                    @neutronstar @OpenMediaOrg I mean I would, but I think it's only fair and sustainable if people pay for their services (i.e. @monocles ) and I've yet to see anything that is as battle-tested and hardened in terms of #privacy as @torproject / #Tor & @guardianproject #Orbot.

                                    - I mean shure there's #I2P and there [used to be] #Freenet but they don't even come close and the latter one has had a horrible rep due to being notoriously abused by a certain kind of folks NOONE wants to deal with!

                                    As always, I do see lack of competition as a risk, even if that competition would've to go up against the most battle-hardened proxy network on the planet.

                                    - I also do acknowledge the limitations. #XMPP+#OMEMO completely falls flat on it's face in *extreme narrowband* scenarios like #SATCOM, Hamradio and Moonbouncing, but these generally struggle with somewhat syncronous protocols that want somewhat low latency and have relatively big message sizes.

                                    N 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • really_idk@mastodon.socialR really_idk@mastodon.social

                                      @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg Signal doesn’t require a phone number.

                                      ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ariarhythmic@ohai.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #24

                                      @really_idk @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg Signal does require a phone number.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • kkarhan@c.imK kkarhan@c.im

                                        @neutronstar @OpenMediaOrg I mean I would, but I think it's only fair and sustainable if people pay for their services (i.e. @monocles ) and I've yet to see anything that is as battle-tested and hardened in terms of #privacy as @torproject / #Tor & @guardianproject #Orbot.

                                        - I mean shure there's #I2P and there [used to be] #Freenet but they don't even come close and the latter one has had a horrible rep due to being notoriously abused by a certain kind of folks NOONE wants to deal with!

                                        As always, I do see lack of competition as a risk, even if that competition would've to go up against the most battle-hardened proxy network on the planet.

                                        - I also do acknowledge the limitations. #XMPP+#OMEMO completely falls flat on it's face in *extreme narrowband* scenarios like #SATCOM, Hamradio and Moonbouncing, but these generally struggle with somewhat syncronous protocols that want somewhat low latency and have relatively big message sizes.

                                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                                        neutronstar@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #25

                                        @kkarhan @OpenMediaOrg @monocles @torproject @guardianproject
                                        Yeah, it’s fair if people pay for the services they use, especially since it incentivises not selling people’s data or metadata. But I must add to this by saying that I think people should have the right to privacy, even if they’re financially constrained.

                                        And agreed, there is no project to date that’s more effective at providing a higher level of privacy than the tor network.

                                        There are also options like Meshtastic that might prove itself to be a valuable tool in due time. Especially for close quarter communication and those edge case scenarios. Best let these projects be separate however, I think so at least.

                                        kkarhan@c.imK 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • wiredfire@mstdn.socialW wiredfire@mstdn.social

                                          @really_idk @OpenMediaOrg unlikely but I’d expect they *would* geofence the service. Essentially blocking their service from operating anywhere with a Canadian IP. And yes you’d likely be able to work around that with a decent VPN, but that’s not what non-technical folk are likely to do.

                                          landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #26

                                          @wiredfire @really_idk @OpenMediaOrg They'll have your Canadian phone number on the account and laugh in the face of your VPN.

                                          I'd be delighted to be disproven. Anyone claiming that Signal doesn't require phone numbers anymore, please feel free to link their instructions on how to register without a phone number.

                                          wiredfire@mstdn.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups