Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
billc22
48 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • really_idk@mastodon.socialR really_idk@mastodon.social

    @OpenMediaOrg will Signal also geofence access to apk?

    wiredfire@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
    wiredfire@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
    wiredfire@mstdn.social
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @really_idk @OpenMediaOrg unlikely but I’d expect they *would* geofence the service. Essentially blocking their service from operating anywhere with a Canadian IP. And yes you’d likely be able to work around that with a decent VPN, but that’s not what non-technical folk are likely to do.

    landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
    • openmediaorg@mastodon.socialO openmediaorg@mastodon.social

      BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

      This should be our final alarm bell: we can have digital privacy or we can have legislation this broad and broken, not both!

      Link Preview Image
      Signal warns it would pull out of Canada if made to comply with lawful access bill

      Secure messaging service says it will not weaken its encryption, privacy safeguards for government

      favicon

      The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

      kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
      kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
      kkarhan@c.im
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      @OpenMediaOrg this is just #Signal chasing #Clout because they never left a juristiction to this point. Neither "P.R." #China nor #Russia nor #KSA nor Iran, and all of those demand even more #BulkAccess…

      - Because Signal is a #HoneyPot collecting #PII like the #PhoneNumbers of their users.

      - The only reason it's not beibg shut down like #EncroChat, #SkyECC and others is because it's the same Modi Operandi as #ANØM aka. #OperationIronside aka. #OperationTrøjanShield.

      If the #Trump Regime of the #USA disliked Signal, it could kill it with a single EO due to it's hard #LockIn on #aws and lack of decentralization!

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • really_idk@mastodon.socialR really_idk@mastodon.social

        @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg Signal doesn’t require a phone number.

        harib_murshidi@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
        harib_murshidi@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
        harib_murshidi@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @really_idk @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg Huh ?! When did that happen ??! You sign up on the app using your mobike phone number (as in Whatscrapp, Telegram) unlike other alternatives like Jami or Session 🤔

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mannanan@mas.toM mannanan@mas.to

          @OpenMediaOrg

          As long as Signal requires a phone number to use, your privacy is already compromised.

          misusecase@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          misusecase@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          misusecase@twit.social
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg This is such a tired, thought-terminating cliche that I’ve seen a hundred times on here.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • kkarhan@c.imK kkarhan@c.im

            @OpenMediaOrg this is just #Signal chasing #Clout because they never left a juristiction to this point. Neither "P.R." #China nor #Russia nor #KSA nor Iran, and all of those demand even more #BulkAccess…

            - Because Signal is a #HoneyPot collecting #PII like the #PhoneNumbers of their users.

            - The only reason it's not beibg shut down like #EncroChat, #SkyECC and others is because it's the same Modi Operandi as #ANØM aka. #OperationIronside aka. #OperationTrøjanShield.

            If the #Trump Regime of the #USA disliked Signal, it could kill it with a single EO due to it's hard #LockIn on #aws and lack of decentralization!

            N This user is from outside of this forum
            N This user is from outside of this forum
            neutronstar@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @kkarhan @OpenMediaOrg
            You really like hashtags don’t you?
            But yeah, we really need to escape these centralised lock-in platforms for decentralised options. I’m personally rooting for Matrix as my main alternative. SimpleX is also a good option in my opinion, as of today. They seem to allow decentralisation too, unlike Signal.

            kkarhan@c.imK 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • really_idk@mastodon.socialR really_idk@mastodon.social

              @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg Signal doesn’t require a phone number.

              alextecplayz@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              alextecplayz@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              alextecplayz@techhub.social
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @really_idk @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg it does require a phone number, you need one to register and/or move your Signal account.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • openmediaorg@mastodon.socialO openmediaorg@mastodon.social

                BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

                This should be our final alarm bell: we can have digital privacy or we can have legislation this broad and broken, not both!

                Link Preview Image
                Signal warns it would pull out of Canada if made to comply with lawful access bill

                Secure messaging service says it will not weaken its encryption, privacy safeguards for government

                favicon

                The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

                zed@mstdn.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
                zed@mstdn.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
                zed@mstdn.party
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @OpenMediaOrg bad on Canada, but also bad on signal for being built in a way where they can decide which countries get access. It should run on an open source backend that can be run on your own servers if you like.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N neutronstar@infosec.exchange

                  @kkarhan @OpenMediaOrg
                  You really like hashtags don’t you?
                  But yeah, we really need to escape these centralised lock-in platforms for decentralised options. I’m personally rooting for Matrix as my main alternative. SimpleX is also a good option in my opinion, as of today. They seem to allow decentralisation too, unlike Signal.

                  kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kkarhan@c.im
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  @neutronstar @OpenMediaOrg Personally, I stick with #XMPP+#OMEMO because it works, there are tons of servers & providers (including paid-for ones that are pro-privacy, like @monocles !) and because it's a mature, #MultiVendor & #MultiProvider solution that pairs nicely with @torproject / #Tor.

                  - I've been using XMPP over Tor (with @guardianproject #Orbot) for the last 15+ years (Cuz #EDGEland has shitty mobile networks!) and it's only gotten better over time!

                  Maybe I need to make a whole writeup on that part if not do a tutorial session for people to listen & watch to.

                  - Cuz it's neither difficult nor complex once one knows what to do. And if I can onboard some frightened #TechIlliterate stuck in a besieged city with a craptastic phone on an extremely slow connection, then it should be easy for calm #Normies in their comfy homes...

                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • kkarhan@c.imK kkarhan@c.im

                    @neutronstar @OpenMediaOrg Personally, I stick with #XMPP+#OMEMO because it works, there are tons of servers & providers (including paid-for ones that are pro-privacy, like @monocles !) and because it's a mature, #MultiVendor & #MultiProvider solution that pairs nicely with @torproject / #Tor.

                    - I've been using XMPP over Tor (with @guardianproject #Orbot) for the last 15+ years (Cuz #EDGEland has shitty mobile networks!) and it's only gotten better over time!

                    Maybe I need to make a whole writeup on that part if not do a tutorial session for people to listen & watch to.

                    - Cuz it's neither difficult nor complex once one knows what to do. And if I can onboard some frightened #TechIlliterate stuck in a besieged city with a craptastic phone on an extremely slow connection, then it should be easy for calm #Normies in their comfy homes...

                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                    neutronstar@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @kkarhan @OpenMediaOrg @monocles @torproject @guardianproject
                    Yeah, can’t really argue against using what is tried and true

                    kkarhan@c.imK 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N neutronstar@infosec.exchange

                      @kkarhan @OpenMediaOrg @monocles @torproject @guardianproject
                      Yeah, can’t really argue against using what is tried and true

                      kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kkarhan@c.im
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @neutronstar @OpenMediaOrg I mean I would, but I think it's only fair and sustainable if people pay for their services (i.e. @monocles ) and I've yet to see anything that is as battle-tested and hardened in terms of #privacy as @torproject / #Tor & @guardianproject #Orbot.

                      - I mean shure there's #I2P and there [used to be] #Freenet but they don't even come close and the latter one has had a horrible rep due to being notoriously abused by a certain kind of folks NOONE wants to deal with!

                      As always, I do see lack of competition as a risk, even if that competition would've to go up against the most battle-hardened proxy network on the planet.

                      - I also do acknowledge the limitations. #XMPP+#OMEMO completely falls flat on it's face in *extreme narrowband* scenarios like #SATCOM, Hamradio and Moonbouncing, but these generally struggle with somewhat syncronous protocols that want somewhat low latency and have relatively big message sizes.

                      N 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • really_idk@mastodon.socialR really_idk@mastodon.social

                        @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg Signal doesn’t require a phone number.

                        ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        ariarhythmic@ohai.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @really_idk @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg Signal does require a phone number.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • kkarhan@c.imK kkarhan@c.im

                          @neutronstar @OpenMediaOrg I mean I would, but I think it's only fair and sustainable if people pay for their services (i.e. @monocles ) and I've yet to see anything that is as battle-tested and hardened in terms of #privacy as @torproject / #Tor & @guardianproject #Orbot.

                          - I mean shure there's #I2P and there [used to be] #Freenet but they don't even come close and the latter one has had a horrible rep due to being notoriously abused by a certain kind of folks NOONE wants to deal with!

                          As always, I do see lack of competition as a risk, even if that competition would've to go up against the most battle-hardened proxy network on the planet.

                          - I also do acknowledge the limitations. #XMPP+#OMEMO completely falls flat on it's face in *extreme narrowband* scenarios like #SATCOM, Hamradio and Moonbouncing, but these generally struggle with somewhat syncronous protocols that want somewhat low latency and have relatively big message sizes.

                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          neutronstar@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @kkarhan @OpenMediaOrg @monocles @torproject @guardianproject
                          Yeah, it’s fair if people pay for the services they use, especially since it incentivises not selling people’s data or metadata. But I must add to this by saying that I think people should have the right to privacy, even if they’re financially constrained.

                          And agreed, there is no project to date that’s more effective at providing a higher level of privacy than the tor network.

                          There are also options like Meshtastic that might prove itself to be a valuable tool in due time. Especially for close quarter communication and those edge case scenarios. Best let these projects be separate however, I think so at least.

                          kkarhan@c.imK 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • wiredfire@mstdn.socialW wiredfire@mstdn.social

                            @really_idk @OpenMediaOrg unlikely but I’d expect they *would* geofence the service. Essentially blocking their service from operating anywhere with a Canadian IP. And yes you’d likely be able to work around that with a decent VPN, but that’s not what non-technical folk are likely to do.

                            landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                            landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                            landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            @wiredfire @really_idk @OpenMediaOrg They'll have your Canadian phone number on the account and laugh in the face of your VPN.

                            I'd be delighted to be disproven. Anyone claiming that Signal doesn't require phone numbers anymore, please feel free to link their instructions on how to register without a phone number.

                            wiredfire@mstdn.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N neutronstar@infosec.exchange

                              @kkarhan @OpenMediaOrg @monocles @torproject @guardianproject
                              Yeah, it’s fair if people pay for the services they use, especially since it incentivises not selling people’s data or metadata. But I must add to this by saying that I think people should have the right to privacy, even if they’re financially constrained.

                              And agreed, there is no project to date that’s more effective at providing a higher level of privacy than the tor network.

                              There are also options like Meshtastic that might prove itself to be a valuable tool in due time. Especially for close quarter communication and those edge case scenarios. Best let these projects be separate however, I think so at least.

                              kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kkarhan@c.im
                              wrote last edited by
                              #27

                              @neutronstar @OpenMediaOrg In the end paying for services like @monocles is kinda necessary if one doesn't want to be sold out.

                              - That's why I don't consider #Signal a sustainable option, given their extremely expensive architecture.

                              So it's no surprise they implemented a #Shitcoin - #Scam named #MobileCoin!

                              - Which is not only so bad that even #TechLiterate #Shitcoin holders can't buy it, but also just unnecessary #bloat that LITERALLY NOONE ASKED FOR!

                              Not to mention MobileCoin had deep ties with #FTX...

                              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DSGq9FQKU4
                              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJoO2uWrX1M
                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MobileCoin#Affiliations_with_FTX

                              kkarhan@c.imK 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • kkarhan@c.imK kkarhan@c.im

                                @neutronstar @OpenMediaOrg In the end paying for services like @monocles is kinda necessary if one doesn't want to be sold out.

                                - That's why I don't consider #Signal a sustainable option, given their extremely expensive architecture.

                                So it's no surprise they implemented a #Shitcoin - #Scam named #MobileCoin!

                                - Which is not only so bad that even #TechLiterate #Shitcoin holders can't buy it, but also just unnecessary #bloat that LITERALLY NOONE ASKED FOR!

                                Not to mention MobileCoin had deep ties with #FTX...

                                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DSGq9FQKU4
                                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJoO2uWrX1M
                                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MobileCoin#Affiliations_with_FTX

                                kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kkarhan@c.im
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                @neutronstar @OpenMediaOrg @monocles I think #meshtastic isn't bad. It's sad that #LoRa is kinda patented but at least there is a vibrant ecosystem around it and more of a "carrot licensing" than "stick licensing" approach from what I can see...

                                - In that regard, it's just a more modern alternative to proprietary modules on #ISM bands.

                                But it again needs "yet another transciever" and dedicaded hardware (even if it's just some tiny IC) and it's nature of "burst" messaging in the vicinity really restricts it's use-cases.

                                - At best I'd consider it a faster & cheaper alternative to Iridium Short Burst Data when you only need coverage on a few fixed sites but neither WiFi nor Bluetooth are an option but you need more than a few hundred bytes at 2400 bit/s, avoiding overcrowded 2,4 GHz and being more generous in message size than #ZigBee...

                                N 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • openmediaorg@mastodon.socialO openmediaorg@mastodon.social

                                  BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

                                  This should be our final alarm bell: we can have digital privacy or we can have legislation this broad and broken, not both!

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Signal warns it would pull out of Canada if made to comply with lawful access bill

                                  Secure messaging service says it will not weaken its encryption, privacy safeguards for government

                                  favicon

                                  The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

                                  oceane@gotosocial.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  oceane@gotosocial.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  oceane@gotosocial.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #29

                                  @OpenMediaOrg The current legislation can’t even successfully criminalize piracy; the issue here is that Canadians, like everyone else, rely on a centralized E2EE messenger. We can and should deploy the infrastructure we lack.

                                  https://cwtch.im

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                    @wiredfire @really_idk @OpenMediaOrg They'll have your Canadian phone number on the account and laugh in the face of your VPN.

                                    I'd be delighted to be disproven. Anyone claiming that Signal doesn't require phone numbers anymore, please feel free to link their instructions on how to register without a phone number.

                                    wiredfire@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    wiredfire@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    wiredfire@mstdn.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #30

                                    @landelare @really_idk @OpenMediaOrg I suspect Signal would actually welcome in your VPN. They’re not out to attack users here and if a user can give Signal plausible deniability of their location via a VPN I strongly suspect they’ll go with it. I may well be disproven as well of course!

                                    reflex@retrogaming.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • wiredfire@mstdn.socialW wiredfire@mstdn.social

                                      @landelare @really_idk @OpenMediaOrg I suspect Signal would actually welcome in your VPN. They’re not out to attack users here and if a user can give Signal plausible deniability of their location via a VPN I strongly suspect they’ll go with it. I may well be disproven as well of course!

                                      reflex@retrogaming.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      reflex@retrogaming.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      reflex@retrogaming.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #31

                                      @wiredfire @landelare @really_idk @OpenMediaOrg @mollyim is an alternative Android client with additional mitigations, if you are on Android, you should consider switching.

                                      wiredfire@mstdn.socialW landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • really_idk@mastodon.socialR really_idk@mastodon.social

                                        @Mannanan @OpenMediaOrg Signal doesn’t require a phone number.

                                        really_idk@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        really_idk@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        really_idk@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #32

                                        I was corrected - you do still require number to register. Thank you all to the people who spoke up.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • openmediaorg@mastodon.socialO openmediaorg@mastodon.social

                                          BREAKING: Signal, the #1 privacy protecting messaging app many of us rely on, is saying they will pull out of 🇨🇦 ENTIRELY if they're scoped into #BillC22 without large changes.

                                          This should be our final alarm bell: we can have digital privacy or we can have legislation this broad and broken, not both!

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Signal warns it would pull out of Canada if made to comply with lawful access bill

                                          Secure messaging service says it will not weaken its encryption, privacy safeguards for government

                                          favicon

                                          The Globe and Mail (www.theglobeandmail.com)

                                          bel_tamtu@meemu.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          bel_tamtu@meemu.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          bel_tamtu@meemu.org
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #33

                                          Putting a CW on the post I'm replying to. Signal says it will pull out of Canada entirely if scoped into Bill C22 without larhe changes.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups