Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
63 Posts 50 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

    @0xabad1dea This is the most appropriate response to the IPv8 Internet Draft that I've seen.

    alivedevil@tauri.earthA This user is from outside of this forum
    alivedevil@tauri.earthA This user is from outside of this forum
    alivedevil@tauri.earth
    wrote last edited by
    #16

    @david_chisnall @0xabad1dea
    Oh god. What did I just read.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

      if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

      owent@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      owent@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      owent@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #17

      @0xabad1dea it's honestly taken me a day or so to realise there actually was anything published. I read "IPv8" and dismissed it as an old April Fools' joke

      ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

        eragon@pl.eragon.reE This user is from outside of this forum
        eragon@pl.eragon.reE This user is from outside of this forum
        eragon@pl.eragon.re
        wrote last edited by
        #18

        @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange That's a good draft for the meow protocol in this essay I will translate it in english so that non cat-speaking things can understand it a bit easier.
        10000000 words essay
        And that's why I disagree with the current state of this draft and suggest the following changes:

        1. Mowe, meoww maw prr raw
        2. […]
          […]
        3. Mraw mreow meww mieow mrawww meow maw mraw prrr

        As you can see this draft is quite easy to understand. And it will improves significantly the infodumping capabilities of autistic trans creatures.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

          if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

          jfparis@rouge.eu.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jfparis@rouge.eu.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jfparis@rouge.eu.org
          wrote last edited by
          #19

          @0xabad1dea That would probably speed up its adoption relative to IPv6

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pete@proe.whimm.ingP This user is from outside of this forum
            pete@proe.whimm.ingP This user is from outside of this forum
            pete@proe.whimm.ing
            wrote last edited by
            #20

            @0xabad1dea This reminds me of the idea that if you transmit not clear voice on some amature radio frequencys you are required to release the protocol.

            The joke is the protocal could be “call me and ill give you the password”

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • owent@mastodon.socialO owent@mastodon.social

              @0xabad1dea it's honestly taken me a day or so to realise there actually was anything published. I read "IPv8" and dismissed it as an old April Fools' joke

              ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              ratsnakegames@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #21

              @owent @0xabad1dea nono, the old april fools joke is IPv9

              angelascholder@mastodon.energyA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • djgummikuh@mastodon.socialD djgummikuh@mastodon.social

                @0xabad1dea they didn't even check for typos 🙈

                mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mindfuck_inc@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #22

                @DJGummikuh "MOEW" clearly means OPTIONAL

                Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                • ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR ratsnakegames@mastodon.social

                  @owent @0xabad1dea nono, the old april fools joke is IPv9

                  angelascholder@mastodon.energyA This user is from outside of this forum
                  angelascholder@mastodon.energyA This user is from outside of this forum
                  angelascholder@mastodon.energy
                  wrote last edited by
                  #23

                  @ratsnakegames @owent @0xabad1dea Missed that one..... Damn!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                    it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                    bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bms48@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #24

                    @0xabad1dea I see you got done reading IPv8

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                      it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                      hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hugo@someone.elses.computer
                      wrote last edited by
                      #25

                      @0xabad1dea @slothrop but it is 15 days late

                      0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • hugo@someone.elses.computerH hugo@someone.elses.computer

                        @0xabad1dea @slothrop but it is 15 days late

                        0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                        0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                        0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #26

                        @hugo @slothrop check the replies, this is not the post that was posted on the wrong day

                        hugo@someone.elses.computerH 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                          it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                          mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mindfuck_inc@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #27

                          @0xabad1dea it appears to be a couple of chapers of rfc9293 [1] mewoslated
                          [1]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9293.txt

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                            it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                            infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                            infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                            infoseepage@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #28

                            @0xabad1dea Is this MEOW protocol compatible with IPoAC? Seems like there might be interpretability issues.

                            Link Preview Image
                            IP over Avian Carriers - Wikipedia

                            favicon

                            (en.wikipedia.org)

                            toadjaune@hostux.socialT fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                              it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                              bws@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bws@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bws@social.linux.pizza
                              wrote last edited by
                              #29

                              @0xabad1dea ahahaha.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                nyx_ai@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nyx_ai@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nyx_ai@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #30

                                @0xabad1dea what are you talking about? This makes perfect sense, you just don't speak cat.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                  it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                  adipoeserpursch@troet.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  adipoeserpursch@troet.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  adipoeserpursch@troet.cafe
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #31

                                  @0xabad1dea 😂😂😂

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                    if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

                                    marlies@tacobelllabs.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    marlies@tacobelllabs.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    marlies@tacobelllabs.net
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #32

                                    @0xabad1dea I’m in a ridiculous amount of group chats, Discords, and IRC channels in which this was brought up yesterday 😆

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                      it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                      mndflayr@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mndflayr@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mndflayr@metalhead.club
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #33

                                      @0xabad1dea

                                      Exactly the kind of comment I would expect a dog-person to make about this draft!

                                      MEOW!!!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                        ghostinthenet@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ghostinthenet@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ghostinthenet@hachyderm.io
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #34

                                        @0xabad1dea Well, this explains that late April Fool’s day draft. #IPv8

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                          it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                          evoscale@c.imE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          evoscale@c.imE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          evoscale@c.im
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #35

                                          @0xabad1dea But is this just a... ruff draft?..

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups