Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
63 Posts 50 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

    it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

    endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
    endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
    endrift@social.treehouse.systems
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @0xabad1dea best response to IPv8 I've seen yet

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

      it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

      0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

      owent@mastodon.socialO jfparis@rouge.eu.orgJ marlies@tacobelllabs.netM kasperd@westergaard.socialK itnomad@ruhr.socialI 8 Replies Last reply
      0
      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

        pecet@f3d1.euP This user is from outside of this forum
        pecet@f3d1.euP This user is from outside of this forum
        pecet@f3d1.eu
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @0xabad1dea Reminds me DougDoug book which I actually own. Still the best YouTuber book

        Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

          it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

          peetz0r@hsnl.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          peetz0r@hsnl.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          peetz0r@hsnl.social
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @0xabad1dea This is beautiful 😄

          meow

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

            it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

            chickpeapole@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            chickpeapole@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            chickpeapole@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @0xabad1dea Outrageous! Just because you can't understand cat speak, doesn't mean it's nonsense.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

              @0xabad1dea This is the most appropriate response to the IPv8 Internet Draft that I've seen.

              alivedevil@tauri.earthA This user is from outside of this forum
              alivedevil@tauri.earthA This user is from outside of this forum
              alivedevil@tauri.earth
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @david_chisnall @0xabad1dea
              Oh god. What did I just read.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

                owent@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                owent@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                owent@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @0xabad1dea it's honestly taken me a day or so to realise there actually was anything published. I read "IPv8" and dismissed it as an old April Fools' joke

                ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                  it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                  eragon@pl.eragon.reE This user is from outside of this forum
                  eragon@pl.eragon.reE This user is from outside of this forum
                  eragon@pl.eragon.re
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange That's a good draft for the meow protocol in this essay I will translate it in english so that non cat-speaking things can understand it a bit easier.
                  10000000 words essay
                  And that's why I disagree with the current state of this draft and suggest the following changes:

                  1. Mowe, meoww maw prr raw
                  2. […]
                    […]
                  3. Mraw mreow meww mieow mrawww meow maw mraw prrr

                  As you can see this draft is quite easy to understand. And it will improves significantly the infodumping capabilities of autistic trans creatures.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                    if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

                    jfparis@rouge.eu.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jfparis@rouge.eu.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jfparis@rouge.eu.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @0xabad1dea That would probably speed up its adoption relative to IPv6

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pete@proe.whimm.ingP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pete@proe.whimm.ingP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pete@proe.whimm.ing
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @0xabad1dea This reminds me of the idea that if you transmit not clear voice on some amature radio frequencys you are required to release the protocol.

                      The joke is the protocal could be “call me and ill give you the password”

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • owent@mastodon.socialO owent@mastodon.social

                        @0xabad1dea it's honestly taken me a day or so to realise there actually was anything published. I read "IPv8" and dismissed it as an old April Fools' joke

                        ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        ratsnakegames@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        @owent @0xabad1dea nono, the old april fools joke is IPv9

                        angelascholder@mastodon.energyA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • djgummikuh@mastodon.socialD djgummikuh@mastodon.social

                          @0xabad1dea they didn't even check for typos 🙈

                          mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mindfuck_inc@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          @DJGummikuh "MOEW" clearly means OPTIONAL

                          Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                          • ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR ratsnakegames@mastodon.social

                            @owent @0xabad1dea nono, the old april fools joke is IPv9

                            angelascholder@mastodon.energyA This user is from outside of this forum
                            angelascholder@mastodon.energyA This user is from outside of this forum
                            angelascholder@mastodon.energy
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            @ratsnakegames @owent @0xabad1dea Missed that one..... Damn!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                              it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                              bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bms48@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              @0xabad1dea I see you got done reading IPv8

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hugo@someone.elses.computer
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                @0xabad1dea @slothrop but it is 15 days late

                                0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • hugo@someone.elses.computerH hugo@someone.elses.computer

                                  @0xabad1dea @slothrop but it is 15 days late

                                  0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                                  0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                                  0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  @hugo @slothrop check the replies, this is not the post that was posted on the wrong day

                                  hugo@someone.elses.computerH 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                    it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                    mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mindfuck_inc@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27

                                    @0xabad1dea it appears to be a couple of chapers of rfc9293 [1] mewoslated
                                    [1]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9293.txt

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                      it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                      infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      infoseepage@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      @0xabad1dea Is this MEOW protocol compatible with IPoAC? Seems like there might be interpretability issues.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      IP over Avian Carriers - Wikipedia

                                      favicon

                                      (en.wikipedia.org)

                                      toadjaune@hostux.socialT fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                        bws@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        bws@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        bws@social.linux.pizza
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #29

                                        @0xabad1dea ahahaha.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                          it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                          nyx_ai@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nyx_ai@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nyx_ai@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #30

                                          @0xabad1dea what are you talking about? This makes perfect sense, you just don't speak cat.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups