Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
63 Posts 50 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • alivedevil@tauri.earthA alivedevil@tauri.earth

    @DJGummikuh @0xabad1dea
    That undercover pigeon, masking as a cat.
    Clever.

    alivedevil@tauri.earthA This user is from outside of this forum
    alivedevil@tauri.earthA This user is from outside of this forum
    alivedevil@tauri.earth
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    @DJGummikuh @0xabad1dea
    Though, there are several occurences of "Moew" that it looks like it is deliberate. Also in the purr-scheme the first 16 sounds are "Meow Mrrp", followed by "Moew Mrrp".

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

      it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

      endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
      endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
      endrift@social.treehouse.systems
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      @0xabad1dea best response to IPv8 I've seen yet

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

        0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
        0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
        0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

        owent@mastodon.socialO jfparis@rouge.eu.orgJ marlies@tacobelllabs.netM kasperd@westergaard.socialK itnomad@ruhr.socialI 8 Replies Last reply
        0
        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

          it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

          pecet@f3d1.euP This user is from outside of this forum
          pecet@f3d1.euP This user is from outside of this forum
          pecet@f3d1.eu
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @0xabad1dea Reminds me DougDoug book which I actually own. Still the best YouTuber book

          Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

            it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

            peetz0r@hsnl.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            peetz0r@hsnl.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            peetz0r@hsnl.social
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            @0xabad1dea This is beautiful 😄

            meow

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

              it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

              chickpeapole@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              chickpeapole@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              chickpeapole@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @0xabad1dea Outrageous! Just because you can't understand cat speak, doesn't mean it's nonsense.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                @0xabad1dea This is the most appropriate response to the IPv8 Internet Draft that I've seen.

                alivedevil@tauri.earthA This user is from outside of this forum
                alivedevil@tauri.earthA This user is from outside of this forum
                alivedevil@tauri.earth
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @david_chisnall @0xabad1dea
                Oh god. What did I just read.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                  if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

                  owent@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  owent@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  owent@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @0xabad1dea it's honestly taken me a day or so to realise there actually was anything published. I read "IPv8" and dismissed it as an old April Fools' joke

                  ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                    it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                    eragon@pl.eragon.reE This user is from outside of this forum
                    eragon@pl.eragon.reE This user is from outside of this forum
                    eragon@pl.eragon.re
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange That's a good draft for the meow protocol in this essay I will translate it in english so that non cat-speaking things can understand it a bit easier.
                    10000000 words essay
                    And that's why I disagree with the current state of this draft and suggest the following changes:

                    1. Mowe, meoww maw prr raw
                    2. […]
                      […]
                    3. Mraw mreow meww mieow mrawww meow maw mraw prrr

                    As you can see this draft is quite easy to understand. And it will improves significantly the infodumping capabilities of autistic trans creatures.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                      if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

                      jfparis@rouge.eu.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jfparis@rouge.eu.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jfparis@rouge.eu.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @0xabad1dea That would probably speed up its adoption relative to IPv6

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pete@proe.whimm.ingP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pete@proe.whimm.ingP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pete@proe.whimm.ing
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        @0xabad1dea This reminds me of the idea that if you transmit not clear voice on some amature radio frequencys you are required to release the protocol.

                        The joke is the protocal could be “call me and ill give you the password”

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • owent@mastodon.socialO owent@mastodon.social

                          @0xabad1dea it's honestly taken me a day or so to realise there actually was anything published. I read "IPv8" and dismissed it as an old April Fools' joke

                          ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          ratsnakegames@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          @owent @0xabad1dea nono, the old april fools joke is IPv9

                          angelascholder@mastodon.energyA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • djgummikuh@mastodon.socialD djgummikuh@mastodon.social

                            @0xabad1dea they didn't even check for typos 🙈

                            mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mindfuck_inc@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #22

                            @DJGummikuh "MOEW" clearly means OPTIONAL

                            Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                            • ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR ratsnakegames@mastodon.social

                              @owent @0xabad1dea nono, the old april fools joke is IPv9

                              angelascholder@mastodon.energyA This user is from outside of this forum
                              angelascholder@mastodon.energyA This user is from outside of this forum
                              angelascholder@mastodon.energy
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              @ratsnakegames @owent @0xabad1dea Missed that one..... Damn!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                bms48@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                @0xabad1dea I see you got done reading IPv8

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                  it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                  hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hugo@someone.elses.computer
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @0xabad1dea @slothrop but it is 15 days late

                                  0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • hugo@someone.elses.computerH hugo@someone.elses.computer

                                    @0xabad1dea @slothrop but it is 15 days late

                                    0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                                    0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                                    0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @hugo @slothrop check the replies, this is not the post that was posted on the wrong day

                                    hugo@someone.elses.computerH 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                      it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                      mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mindfuck_inc@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #27

                                      @0xabad1dea it appears to be a couple of chapers of rfc9293 [1] mewoslated
                                      [1]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9293.txt

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                        infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        infoseepage@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #28

                                        @0xabad1dea Is this MEOW protocol compatible with IPoAC? Seems like there might be interpretability issues.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        IP over Avian Carriers - Wikipedia

                                        favicon

                                        (en.wikipedia.org)

                                        toadjaune@hostux.socialT fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                          it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                          bws@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          bws@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          bws@social.linux.pizza
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #29

                                          @0xabad1dea ahahaha.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups