Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
63 Posts 50 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

    it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

    pecet@f3d1.euP This user is from outside of this forum
    pecet@f3d1.euP This user is from outside of this forum
    pecet@f3d1.eu
    wrote last edited by
    #13

    @0xabad1dea Reminds me DougDoug book which I actually own. Still the best YouTuber book

    Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

      it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

      peetz0r@hsnl.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      peetz0r@hsnl.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      peetz0r@hsnl.social
      wrote last edited by
      #14

      @0xabad1dea This is beautiful ๐Ÿ˜„

      meow

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

        chickpeapole@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        chickpeapole@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        chickpeapole@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #15

        @0xabad1dea Outrageous! Just because you can't understand cat speak, doesn't mean it's nonsense.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

          @0xabad1dea This is the most appropriate response to the IPv8 Internet Draft that I've seen.

          alivedevil@tauri.earthA This user is from outside of this forum
          alivedevil@tauri.earthA This user is from outside of this forum
          alivedevil@tauri.earth
          wrote last edited by
          #16

          @david_chisnall @0xabad1dea
          Oh god. What did I just read.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

            if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

            owent@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
            owent@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
            owent@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #17

            @0xabad1dea it's honestly taken me a day or so to realise there actually was anything published. I read "IPv8" and dismissed it as an old April Fools' joke

            ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

              it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

              eragon@pl.eragon.reE This user is from outside of this forum
              eragon@pl.eragon.reE This user is from outside of this forum
              eragon@pl.eragon.re
              wrote last edited by
              #18

              @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange That's a good draft for the meow protocol in this essay I will translate it in english so that non cat-speaking things can understand it a bit easier.
              10000000 words essay
              And that's why I disagree with the current state of this draft and suggest the following changes:

              1. Mowe, meoww maw prr raw
              2. [โ€ฆ]
                [โ€ฆ]
              3. Mraw mreow meww mieow mrawww meow maw mraw prrr

              As you can see this draft is quite easy to understand. And it will improves significantly the infodumping capabilities of autistic trans creatures.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

                jfparis@rouge.eu.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jfparis@rouge.eu.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jfparis@rouge.eu.org
                wrote last edited by
                #19

                @0xabad1dea That would probably speed up its adoption relative to IPv6

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • pete@proe.whimm.ingP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pete@proe.whimm.ingP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pete@proe.whimm.ing
                  wrote last edited by
                  #20

                  @0xabad1dea This reminds me of the idea that if you transmit not clear voice on some amature radio frequencys you are required to release the protocol.

                  The joke is the protocal could be โ€œcall me and ill give you the passwordโ€

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • owent@mastodon.socialO owent@mastodon.social

                    @0xabad1dea it's honestly taken me a day or so to realise there actually was anything published. I read "IPv8" and dismissed it as an old April Fools' joke

                    ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ratsnakegames@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #21

                    @owent @0xabad1dea nono, the old april fools joke is IPv9

                    angelascholder@mastodon.energyA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • djgummikuh@mastodon.socialD djgummikuh@mastodon.social

                      @0xabad1dea they didn't even check for typos ๐Ÿ™ˆ

                      mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mindfuck_inc@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22

                      @DJGummikuh "MOEW" clearly means OPTIONAL

                      Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                      • ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR ratsnakegames@mastodon.social

                        @owent @0xabad1dea nono, the old april fools joke is IPv9

                        angelascholder@mastodon.energyA This user is from outside of this forum
                        angelascholder@mastodon.energyA This user is from outside of this forum
                        angelascholder@mastodon.energy
                        wrote last edited by
                        #23

                        @ratsnakegames @owent @0xabad1dea Missed that one..... Damn!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                          it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                          bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bms48@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #24

                          @0xabad1dea I see you got done reading IPv8

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                            it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                            hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hugo@someone.elses.computer
                            wrote last edited by
                            #25

                            @0xabad1dea @slothrop but it is 15 days late

                            0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • hugo@someone.elses.computerH hugo@someone.elses.computer

                              @0xabad1dea @slothrop but it is 15 days late

                              0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                              0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                              0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #26

                              @hugo @slothrop check the replies, this is not the post that was posted on the wrong day

                              hugo@someone.elses.computerH 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mindfuck_inc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mindfuck_inc@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #27

                                @0xabad1dea it appears to be a couple of chapers of rfc9293 [1] mewoslated
                                [1]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9293.txt

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                  it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                  infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  infoseepage@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #28

                                  @0xabad1dea Is this MEOW protocol compatible with IPoAC? Seems like there might be interpretability issues.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  IP over Avian Carriers - Wikipedia

                                  favicon

                                  (en.wikipedia.org)

                                  toadjaune@hostux.socialT fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                    it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                    bws@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    bws@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    bws@social.linux.pizza
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #29

                                    @0xabad1dea ahahaha.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                      it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                      nyx_ai@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nyx_ai@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nyx_ai@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #30

                                      @0xabad1dea what are you talking about? This makes perfect sense, you just don't speak cat.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                                        adipoeserpursch@troet.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        adipoeserpursch@troet.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        adipoeserpursch@troet.cafe
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #31

                                        @0xabad1dea ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                                          if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

                                          marlies@tacobelllabs.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          marlies@tacobelllabs.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          marlies@tacobelllabs.net
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #32

                                          @0xabad1dea Iโ€™m in a ridiculous amount of group chats, Discords, and IRC channels in which this was brought up yesterday ๐Ÿ˜†

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups