Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. hm https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app/blob/main/CLAUDE.md

hm https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app/blob/main/CLAUDE.md

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
108 Posts 55 Posters 289 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
    @fay @cwebber @res260 is this a failure of ours? Perhaps. But it's the sum product of millions of small failures, not something easily corrected
    fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
    fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
    fay@lingo.lol
    wrote last edited by
    #98

    @erincandescent @res260 @cwebber with the hundreds of billions of dollars burned to make stochastic code generators that only sort of work (and at horrific ethical costs), i dare say that we could have developed adequate tooling instead, and we still can

    erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • fay@lingo.lolF fay@lingo.lol

      @erincandescent @res260 @cwebber with the hundreds of billions of dollars burned to make stochastic code generators that only sort of work (and at horrific ethical costs), i dare say that we could have developed adequate tooling instead, and we still can

      erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
      erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
      erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
      wrote last edited by
      #99
      @fay @res260 @cwebber it's a coordination problem, not an effort problem. If everyone agreed to use the one serialisation format with the one schema language, with the one runtime environment, ...
      fay@lingo.lolF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
        @fay @res260 @cwebber it's a coordination problem, not an effort problem. If everyone agreed to use the one serialisation format with the one schema language, with the one runtime environment, ...
        fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
        fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
        fay@lingo.lol
        wrote last edited by
        #100

        @erincandescent @res260 @cwebber i mean a lot of people are agreeing to use the one llm right now, it seems

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

          Also https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3meogr22l3k2d

          > A year ago, I thought LLMs were kind of neat but not that useful. I saw the code autocomplete and thought, meh.
          >
          >Last summer just flipped. I never ever thought I would see automated code generation like we see now.
          >
          > I know there’s baggage but you need to know the coders are being real about this

          aslakr@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          aslakr@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          aslakr@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #101

          @cwebber Is there something funky going on? bsky seems to be down, at least in Europe.

          And the post seems blocked by a labeler in blacksky https://blacksky.community/profile/did:plc:ragtjsm2j2vknwkz3zp4oxrd/post/3meogr22l3k2d

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

            Also https://bsky.app/profile/samuel.fm/post/3mbz27d6qnc2v

            cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
            cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
            cwebber@social.coop
            wrote last edited by
            #102

            Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

            > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
            >
            > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

            fay@lingo.lolF kats@chaosfem.twK itamarst@hachyderm.ioI brad@m.toad.hostB faoluin@chitter.xyzF 5 Replies Last reply
            0
            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

              Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

              > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
              >
              > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

              fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
              fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
              fay@lingo.lol
              wrote last edited by
              #103

              @cwebber yeah he's still his insufferable arrogant idiot self

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                >
                > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                kats@chaosfem.tw
                wrote last edited by
                #104

                @cwebber Typing is their primary timesink while developing? Not thinking?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                  Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                  > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                  >
                  > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                  itamarst@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                  itamarst@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                  itamarst@hachyderm.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #105

                  @cwebber The idea that the primary timesink of a software engineer is typing is bizarre.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                    Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                    > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                    >
                    > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                    brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                    brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                    brad@m.toad.host
                    wrote last edited by
                    #106

                    @cwebber I'm really not a huge fan of how ready people seem to be to just completely relinquish their ability to code. It does not take long for your brain to wallpaper over entire skillsets.

                    brad@m.toad.hostB 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                      Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                      > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                      >
                      > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                      faoluin@chitter.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
                      faoluin@chitter.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
                      faoluin@chitter.xyz
                      wrote last edited by
                      #107

                      @cwebber LLMs write better code* until the investors come knocking for their payouts, then the price goes up and LLMs aren't writing any code.

                      * they don't

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • brad@m.toad.hostB brad@m.toad.host

                        @cwebber I'm really not a huge fan of how ready people seem to be to just completely relinquish their ability to code. It does not take long for your brain to wallpaper over entire skillsets.

                        brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                        brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                        brad@m.toad.host
                        wrote last edited by
                        #108

                        @cwebber also, I can see this type of situation very, very easily spiraling into a classic "death by convenience."
                        How long until the primary engineers no longer understand the how their program is built or what motivated ostensibly insignificant decisions that eventually add up

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups