Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. hm https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app/blob/main/CLAUDE.md

hm https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app/blob/main/CLAUDE.md

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
108 Posts 55 Posters 289 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

    I have this suspicion that the ATproto stack, at least the stuff from Bluesky, is heading towards "majority-vibecoded" but that's mostly just from seeing a lot of posts from the Bluesky eng team rather than me having spent much time in the codebase

    Why is def hugely responsible for Bluesky/ATProto's design and if *he's* mostly letting Claude write 99% of his code, the rest of the eng team is likely to be heading in that direction too?

    cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
    cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
    cwebber@social.coop
    wrote last edited by
    #90

    Also https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3meogr22l3k2d

    > A year ago, I thought LLMs were kind of neat but not that useful. I saw the code autocomplete and thought, meh.
    >
    >Last summer just flipped. I never ever thought I would see automated code generation like we see now.
    >
    > I know there’s baggage but you need to know the coders are being real about this

    cwebber@social.coopC aslakr@mastodon.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

      Also https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3meogr22l3k2d

      > A year ago, I thought LLMs were kind of neat but not that useful. I saw the code autocomplete and thought, meh.
      >
      >Last summer just flipped. I never ever thought I would see automated code generation like we see now.
      >
      > I know there’s baggage but you need to know the coders are being real about this

      cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
      cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
      cwebber@social.coop
      wrote last edited by
      #91

      Also https://bsky.app/profile/samuel.fm/post/3mbz27d6qnc2v

      eramdam@social.erambert.meE cwebber@social.coopC 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

        Also https://bsky.app/profile/samuel.fm/post/3mbz27d6qnc2v

        eramdam@social.erambert.meE This user is from outside of this forum
        eramdam@social.erambert.meE This user is from outside of this forum
        eramdam@social.erambert.me
        wrote last edited by
        #92

        @cwebber yeah, least surprising Bluesky thing to do

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
          @res260 @cwebber even a craftsman is sometimes just doing rote tasks
          fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
          fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
          fay@lingo.lol
          wrote last edited by
          #93

          @erincandescent
          @res260 @cwebber we have tools for that tho? templates and libraries and bootstrapping and automation tools. they don't have to be, as @olivia so said a couple month ago "made from shit and blood"

          erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • fay@lingo.lolF fay@lingo.lol

            @erincandescent
            @res260 @cwebber we have tools for that tho? templates and libraries and bootstrapping and automation tools. they don't have to be, as @olivia so said a couple month ago "made from shit and blood"

            erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
            erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
            erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
            wrote last edited by
            #94
            @fay @res260 @cwebber there's lots of code for which no reusable template could be created that is nonetheless rote
            erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE fay@lingo.lolF 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
              @fay @res260 @cwebber there's lots of code for which no reusable template could be created that is nonetheless rote
              erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
              erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
              erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
              wrote last edited by
              #95
              @fay @cwebber @res260 is this a failure of ours? Perhaps. But it's the sum product of millions of small failures, not something easily corrected
              fay@lingo.lolF 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                Example: https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3meomclcfss2w

                > Until December of last year I was using LLMs as fancy autocomplete for coding. It was nice for scaffolding out boilerplate, or giving me a gut check on some things, or banging out some boring routine stuff.
                >
                > In the past two months Claude has written about 99% of my code. Things are changing. Fast

                theesm@social.tchncs.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                theesm@social.tchncs.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                theesm@social.tchncs.de
                wrote last edited by
                #96

                @cwebber oof, always wonder what review processes are in place at places where a large portion of changes have been vibecoded. I tend to discuss why a certain implementation has been picked, what pitfalls have been considered, if a solution is adequate to a problem etc. when reviewing major changes with engineers whose code I review, "claude did that" wouldn't really stand as an answer in my book. Makes me wonder if that kind of discussion just isn't common anymore? this whole agent stuff just seems like a big footgun to me that will inevitably lead to hard to comprehend and more difficult to navigate/to maintain codebases

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
                  @fay @res260 @cwebber there's lots of code for which no reusable template could be created that is nonetheless rote
                  fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fay@lingo.lol
                  wrote last edited by
                  #97

                  @erincandescent @res260 @cwebber respectfully, that's not my experience 🙂 If the task is specific enough to require human intervention, then it shouldn't be left to a stochastic code generator either

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
                    @fay @cwebber @res260 is this a failure of ours? Perhaps. But it's the sum product of millions of small failures, not something easily corrected
                    fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fay@lingo.lol
                    wrote last edited by
                    #98

                    @erincandescent @res260 @cwebber with the hundreds of billions of dollars burned to make stochastic code generators that only sort of work (and at horrific ethical costs), i dare say that we could have developed adequate tooling instead, and we still can

                    erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • fay@lingo.lolF fay@lingo.lol

                      @erincandescent @res260 @cwebber with the hundreds of billions of dollars burned to make stochastic code generators that only sort of work (and at horrific ethical costs), i dare say that we could have developed adequate tooling instead, and we still can

                      erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                      erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                      erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
                      wrote last edited by
                      #99
                      @fay @res260 @cwebber it's a coordination problem, not an effort problem. If everyone agreed to use the one serialisation format with the one schema language, with the one runtime environment, ...
                      fay@lingo.lolF 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
                        @fay @res260 @cwebber it's a coordination problem, not an effort problem. If everyone agreed to use the one serialisation format with the one schema language, with the one runtime environment, ...
                        fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fay@lingo.lol
                        wrote last edited by
                        #100

                        @erincandescent @res260 @cwebber i mean a lot of people are agreeing to use the one llm right now, it seems

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                          Also https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3meogr22l3k2d

                          > A year ago, I thought LLMs were kind of neat but not that useful. I saw the code autocomplete and thought, meh.
                          >
                          >Last summer just flipped. I never ever thought I would see automated code generation like we see now.
                          >
                          > I know there’s baggage but you need to know the coders are being real about this

                          aslakr@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          aslakr@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          aslakr@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #101

                          @cwebber Is there something funky going on? bsky seems to be down, at least in Europe.

                          And the post seems blocked by a labeler in blacksky https://blacksky.community/profile/did:plc:ragtjsm2j2vknwkz3zp4oxrd/post/3meogr22l3k2d

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                            Also https://bsky.app/profile/samuel.fm/post/3mbz27d6qnc2v

                            cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cwebber@social.coop
                            wrote last edited by
                            #102

                            Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                            > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                            >
                            > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                            fay@lingo.lolF kats@chaosfem.twK itamarst@hachyderm.ioI brad@m.toad.hostB faoluin@chitter.xyzF 5 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                              Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                              > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                              >
                              > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                              fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fay@lingo.lol
                              wrote last edited by
                              #103

                              @cwebber yeah he's still his insufferable arrogant idiot self

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                                > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                                >
                                > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                                kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kats@chaosfem.tw
                                wrote last edited by
                                #104

                                @cwebber Typing is their primary timesink while developing? Not thinking?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                  Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                                  > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                                  >
                                  > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                                  itamarst@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  itamarst@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  itamarst@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #105

                                  @cwebber The idea that the primary timesink of a software engineer is typing is bizarre.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                    Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                                    > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                                    >
                                    > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                                    brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    brad@m.toad.host
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #106

                                    @cwebber I'm really not a huge fan of how ready people seem to be to just completely relinquish their ability to code. It does not take long for your brain to wallpaper over entire skillsets.

                                    brad@m.toad.hostB 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                                    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                      Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                                      > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                                      >
                                      > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                                      faoluin@chitter.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      faoluin@chitter.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      faoluin@chitter.xyz
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #107

                                      @cwebber LLMs write better code* until the investors come knocking for their payouts, then the price goes up and LLMs aren't writing any code.

                                      * they don't

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • brad@m.toad.hostB brad@m.toad.host

                                        @cwebber I'm really not a huge fan of how ready people seem to be to just completely relinquish their ability to code. It does not take long for your brain to wallpaper over entire skillsets.

                                        brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        brad@m.toad.host
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #108

                                        @cwebber also, I can see this type of situation very, very easily spiraling into a classic "death by convenience."
                                        How long until the primary engineers no longer understand the how their program is built or what motivated ostensibly insignificant decisions that eventually add up

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups