Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. hm https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app/blob/main/CLAUDE.md

hm https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app/blob/main/CLAUDE.md

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
108 Posts 55 Posters 289 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gnomon@mastodon.socialG gnomon@mastodon.social

    @joeyh @cwebber well that is mighty disappointing.

    benjamineskola@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
    benjamineskola@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
    benjamineskola@hachyderm.io
    wrote last edited by
    #89

    @gnomon @joeyh @cwebber They were advertising some LLM stuff in the most recent release notes but it didn't sound like they were actually using it on Vim itself.

    On the other hand, anyone who cares enough to advertise LLMs is probably using them too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

      I have this suspicion that the ATproto stack, at least the stuff from Bluesky, is heading towards "majority-vibecoded" but that's mostly just from seeing a lot of posts from the Bluesky eng team rather than me having spent much time in the codebase

      Why is def hugely responsible for Bluesky/ATProto's design and if *he's* mostly letting Claude write 99% of his code, the rest of the eng team is likely to be heading in that direction too?

      cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
      cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
      cwebber@social.coop
      wrote last edited by
      #90

      Also https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3meogr22l3k2d

      > A year ago, I thought LLMs were kind of neat but not that useful. I saw the code autocomplete and thought, meh.
      >
      >Last summer just flipped. I never ever thought I would see automated code generation like we see now.
      >
      > I know there’s baggage but you need to know the coders are being real about this

      cwebber@social.coopC aslakr@mastodon.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

        Also https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3meogr22l3k2d

        > A year ago, I thought LLMs were kind of neat but not that useful. I saw the code autocomplete and thought, meh.
        >
        >Last summer just flipped. I never ever thought I would see automated code generation like we see now.
        >
        > I know there’s baggage but you need to know the coders are being real about this

        cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
        cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
        cwebber@social.coop
        wrote last edited by
        #91

        Also https://bsky.app/profile/samuel.fm/post/3mbz27d6qnc2v

        eramdam@social.erambert.meE cwebber@social.coopC 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

          Also https://bsky.app/profile/samuel.fm/post/3mbz27d6qnc2v

          eramdam@social.erambert.meE This user is from outside of this forum
          eramdam@social.erambert.meE This user is from outside of this forum
          eramdam@social.erambert.me
          wrote last edited by
          #92

          @cwebber yeah, least surprising Bluesky thing to do

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
            @res260 @cwebber even a craftsman is sometimes just doing rote tasks
            fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
            fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
            fay@lingo.lol
            wrote last edited by
            #93

            @erincandescent
            @res260 @cwebber we have tools for that tho? templates and libraries and bootstrapping and automation tools. they don't have to be, as @olivia so said a couple month ago "made from shit and blood"

            erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • fay@lingo.lolF fay@lingo.lol

              @erincandescent
              @res260 @cwebber we have tools for that tho? templates and libraries and bootstrapping and automation tools. they don't have to be, as @olivia so said a couple month ago "made from shit and blood"

              erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
              erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
              erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
              wrote last edited by
              #94
              @fay @res260 @cwebber there's lots of code for which no reusable template could be created that is nonetheless rote
              erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE fay@lingo.lolF 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
                @fay @res260 @cwebber there's lots of code for which no reusable template could be created that is nonetheless rote
                erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
                wrote last edited by
                #95
                @fay @cwebber @res260 is this a failure of ours? Perhaps. But it's the sum product of millions of small failures, not something easily corrected
                fay@lingo.lolF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                  Example: https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3meomclcfss2w

                  > Until December of last year I was using LLMs as fancy autocomplete for coding. It was nice for scaffolding out boilerplate, or giving me a gut check on some things, or banging out some boring routine stuff.
                  >
                  > In the past two months Claude has written about 99% of my code. Things are changing. Fast

                  theesm@social.tchncs.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                  theesm@social.tchncs.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                  theesm@social.tchncs.de
                  wrote last edited by
                  #96

                  @cwebber oof, always wonder what review processes are in place at places where a large portion of changes have been vibecoded. I tend to discuss why a certain implementation has been picked, what pitfalls have been considered, if a solution is adequate to a problem etc. when reviewing major changes with engineers whose code I review, "claude did that" wouldn't really stand as an answer in my book. Makes me wonder if that kind of discussion just isn't common anymore? this whole agent stuff just seems like a big footgun to me that will inevitably lead to hard to comprehend and more difficult to navigate/to maintain codebases

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
                    @fay @res260 @cwebber there's lots of code for which no reusable template could be created that is nonetheless rote
                    fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fay@lingo.lol
                    wrote last edited by
                    #97

                    @erincandescent @res260 @cwebber respectfully, that's not my experience 🙂 If the task is specific enough to require human intervention, then it shouldn't be left to a stochastic code generator either

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
                      @fay @cwebber @res260 is this a failure of ours? Perhaps. But it's the sum product of millions of small failures, not something easily corrected
                      fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fay@lingo.lol
                      wrote last edited by
                      #98

                      @erincandescent @res260 @cwebber with the hundreds of billions of dollars burned to make stochastic code generators that only sort of work (and at horrific ethical costs), i dare say that we could have developed adequate tooling instead, and we still can

                      erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • fay@lingo.lolF fay@lingo.lol

                        @erincandescent @res260 @cwebber with the hundreds of billions of dollars burned to make stochastic code generators that only sort of work (and at horrific ethical costs), i dare say that we could have developed adequate tooling instead, and we still can

                        erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                        erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                        erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #99
                        @fay @res260 @cwebber it's a coordination problem, not an effort problem. If everyone agreed to use the one serialisation format with the one schema language, with the one runtime environment, ...
                        fay@lingo.lolF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
                          @fay @res260 @cwebber it's a coordination problem, not an effort problem. If everyone agreed to use the one serialisation format with the one schema language, with the one runtime environment, ...
                          fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fay@lingo.lol
                          wrote last edited by
                          #100

                          @erincandescent @res260 @cwebber i mean a lot of people are agreeing to use the one llm right now, it seems

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                            Also https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3meogr22l3k2d

                            > A year ago, I thought LLMs were kind of neat but not that useful. I saw the code autocomplete and thought, meh.
                            >
                            >Last summer just flipped. I never ever thought I would see automated code generation like we see now.
                            >
                            > I know there’s baggage but you need to know the coders are being real about this

                            aslakr@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aslakr@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aslakr@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #101

                            @cwebber Is there something funky going on? bsky seems to be down, at least in Europe.

                            And the post seems blocked by a labeler in blacksky https://blacksky.community/profile/did:plc:ragtjsm2j2vknwkz3zp4oxrd/post/3meogr22l3k2d

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                              Also https://bsky.app/profile/samuel.fm/post/3mbz27d6qnc2v

                              cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cwebber@social.coop
                              wrote last edited by
                              #102

                              Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                              > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                              >
                              > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                              fay@lingo.lolF kats@chaosfem.twK itamarst@hachyderm.ioI brad@m.toad.hostB faoluin@chitter.xyzF 5 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                                > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                                >
                                > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                                fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fay@lingo.lolF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fay@lingo.lol
                                wrote last edited by
                                #103

                                @cwebber yeah he's still his insufferable arrogant idiot self

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                  Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                                  > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                                  >
                                  > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                                  kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kats@chaosfem.tw
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #104

                                  @cwebber Typing is their primary timesink while developing? Not thinking?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                    Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                                    > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                                    >
                                    > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                                    itamarst@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    itamarst@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    itamarst@hachyderm.io
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #105

                                    @cwebber The idea that the primary timesink of a software engineer is typing is bizarre.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                      Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                                      > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                                      >
                                      > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                                      brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      brad@m.toad.host
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #106

                                      @cwebber I'm really not a huge fan of how ready people seem to be to just completely relinquish their ability to code. It does not take long for your brain to wallpaper over entire skillsets.

                                      brad@m.toad.hostB 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                                      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                        Welp, there we go https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3mgaqaaisfs2e

                                        > Oh interesting, people who don’t know how to build software are getting mad at my post about building software. Cute.
                                        >
                                        > Let me be clear, over the next year, the job of software engineer will shift dramatically to no longer have typing syntax into an editor as its primary time sink.

                                        faoluin@chitter.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        faoluin@chitter.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        faoluin@chitter.xyz
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #107

                                        @cwebber LLMs write better code* until the investors come knocking for their payouts, then the price goes up and LLMs aren't writing any code.

                                        * they don't

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • brad@m.toad.hostB brad@m.toad.host

                                          @cwebber I'm really not a huge fan of how ready people seem to be to just completely relinquish their ability to code. It does not take long for your brain to wallpaper over entire skillsets.

                                          brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          brad@m.toad.hostB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          brad@m.toad.host
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #108

                                          @cwebber also, I can see this type of situation very, very easily spiraling into a classic "death by convenience."
                                          How long until the primary engineers no longer understand the how their program is built or what motivated ostensibly insignificant decisions that eventually add up

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups