Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
72 Posts 31 Posters 122 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

    what alpine *has* done is ship the systemd unit files included with upstream packages in aports. and this is not new, we have been doing this for a while now.

    alpine *also* ships some systemd components as isolated components, such as systemd-boot. we may also use systemd's udev in the future as well.

    but these are, and in the case of udev, would be properly integrated into alpine, not the other way around.

    aelspire@aelspire.infoA This user is from outside of this forum
    aelspire@aelspire.infoA This user is from outside of this forum
    aelspire@aelspire.info
    wrote last edited by
    #29

    @ariadne Woho! Thanks for considering using udev in Alpine! It was the thing which forced me to return to Arch, while I would prefer to use Alpine. I've tried to use mdev + libudev-zero but it had a lot of quirks, so I switched to eudev but it had problems with mounting encrypted USB drives and some other quirks, so I tried to just use mount, but while on (some?) BSDs you can allow mount without root when user have permissions for both a device and a mount point, Linux does not.

    Almost everything depends on libudev…

    ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

      to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

      https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

      lkundrak@metalhead.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
      lkundrak@metalhead.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
      lkundrak@metalhead.club
      wrote last edited by
      #30

      @ariadne "this looks like a normal article to me"

      -- high school bullies who couldn't write an essay and never figured out why they got an E

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

        @ariadne you can use systemd-udevd separately?

        zyx@social.treehouse.systemsZ This user is from outside of this forum
        zyx@social.treehouse.systemsZ This user is from outside of this forum
        zyx@social.treehouse.systems
        wrote last edited by
        #31

        @whitequark @ariadne yep Gentoo has been packaging systemd-{tmpfiles,udevd,boot} separately on OpenRC systems for a long while.

        whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • zyx@social.treehouse.systemsZ zyx@social.treehouse.systems

          @whitequark @ariadne yep Gentoo has been packaging systemd-{tmpfiles,udevd,boot} separately on OpenRC systems for a long while.

          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
          whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
          wrote last edited by
          #32

          @zyx @ariadne I had assumed the eudev fork needed to happen bc this wasn't possible

          ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA eschwartz@fosstodon.orgE 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

            @zyx @ariadne I had assumed the eudev fork needed to happen bc this wasn't possible

            ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
            ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
            ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
            wrote last edited by
            #33

            @zyx @whitequark at one point in time it was necessary, but it's a lot easier now with meson.

            dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

              @zyx @whitequark at one point in time it was necessary, but it's a lot easier now with meson.

              dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
              dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
              dysfun@social.treehouse.systems
              wrote last edited by
              #34

              @ariadne how does meson help here? just out of curiosity

              ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD dysfun@social.treehouse.systems

                @ariadne how does meson help here? just out of curiosity

                ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
                wrote last edited by
                #35

                @dysfun we can easily build specific subcomponents of systemd with meson while still getting the internal dependencies right. with autotools it was a nightmare.

                dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                  @dysfun we can easily build specific subcomponents of systemd with meson while still getting the internal dependencies right. with autotools it was a nightmare.

                  dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dysfun@social.treehouse.systems
                  wrote last edited by
                  #36

                  @ariadne makes sense

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                    to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

                    https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

                    coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC This user is from outside of this forum
                    coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC This user is from outside of this forum
                    coolbean@brain.worm.pink
                    wrote last edited by
                    #37
                    @ariadne lmfao the hoax generators be generating hoaxes
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                    • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                      to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

                      https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

                      moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                      moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                      moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #38
                      @ariadne
                      Linux Urinal also slopped out an article that misrepresented Loss32 (project for running Wine as the primary desktop environment, 'cause it's easier and more helpful than making endless Wine frontends) as just another "modern Linux for 32-bit notebooks"-project.

                      I hope @hikari is as disappointed as I am
                      hikari@social.noyu.meH 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                        to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

                        https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

                        arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        arcaneoverflow@techhub.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #39

                        @ariadne I'm glad to hear it 🙂 I was looking for a tidier and more focussed disti some time ago, and looking more closely I should probably have chosen Alpine 🙂

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • neal@social.gompa.meN neal@social.gompa.me

                          @ariadne Yeah, it's probably going to happen with something particularly dumb too. I can already see it coming...

                          techokami@woof.techT This user is from outside of this forum
                          techokami@woof.techT This user is from outside of this forum
                          techokami@woof.tech
                          wrote last edited by
                          #40

                          @neal @ariadne I thought Linux Journal shut down long ago, is this some AI slop zombie wearing its skin?

                          brad@1040ste.netB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • techokami@woof.techT techokami@woof.tech

                            @neal @ariadne I thought Linux Journal shut down long ago, is this some AI slop zombie wearing its skin?

                            brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                            brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                            brad@1040ste.net
                            wrote last edited by
                            #41

                            @techokami @neal @ariadne Take a look at the "About Us" page, no mention of the current people. The listed-as-former staff last contributed around 2019...

                            techokami@woof.techT 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org
                              @ariadne
                              Linux Urinal also slopped out an article that misrepresented Loss32 (project for running Wine as the primary desktop environment, 'cause it's easier and more helpful than making endless Wine frontends) as just another "modern Linux for 32-bit notebooks"-project.

                              I hope @hikari is as disappointed as I am
                              hikari@social.noyu.meH This user is from outside of this forum
                              hikari@social.noyu.meH This user is from outside of this forum
                              hikari@social.noyu.me
                              wrote last edited by
                              #42

                              @moses_izumi @ariadne do link the article to remind me?

                              moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • hikari@social.noyu.meH hikari@social.noyu.me

                                @moses_izumi @ariadne do link the article to remind me?

                                moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org
                                wrote last edited by
                                #43
                                @hikari @ariadne
                                here:

                                https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/introducing-loss32-new-lightweight-linux-distro-focus-legacy-hardware
                                hikari@social.noyu.meH 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org
                                  @hikari @ariadne
                                  here:

                                  https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/introducing-loss32-new-lightweight-linux-distro-focus-legacy-hardware
                                  hikari@social.noyu.meH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hikari@social.noyu.meH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hikari@social.noyu.me
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #44

                                  @moses_izumi @ariadne

                                  a lightweight operating system built from scratch with one goal in mind — giving old and low-resource computers a new lease on life

                                  Loss32 began as a personal project by a group of open-source enthusiasts frustrated with how quickly modern software has moved past older machines.

                                  The name Loss32 stems from its focus on “losing” unnecessary bloat — keeping only what’s essential — and the fact that it targets 32-bit and low-resource systems that many other distros are abandoning.

                                  is this entire thing an AI hallucination? it's genuinely unbelievably bad, there's basically no relation whatsoever to anything I wrote on loss32.org

                                  ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • brad@1040ste.netB brad@1040ste.net

                                    @techokami @neal @ariadne Take a look at the "About Us" page, no mention of the current people. The listed-as-former staff last contributed around 2019...

                                    techokami@woof.techT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    techokami@woof.techT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    techokami@woof.tech
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #45

                                    @brad @neal @ariadne ahh so it is AI slop zombie wearing its skin

                                    brad@1040ste.netB 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                                      to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

                                      https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

                                      justsoup@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      justsoup@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      justsoup@mstdn.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #46

                                      @ariadne Shocking title plus AI slop is a recipe for clicks nowadays. Its just tabloids for the internet.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • techokami@woof.techT techokami@woof.tech

                                        @brad @neal @ariadne ahh so it is AI slop zombie wearing its skin

                                        brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        brad@1040ste.net
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #47

                                        @techokami @neal @ariadne Either that, or this new fellow is doing a Jordan Breeding on a defunct site. Maybe somewhere in the middle.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        0
                                        • hikari@social.noyu.meH hikari@social.noyu.me

                                          @moses_izumi @ariadne

                                          a lightweight operating system built from scratch with one goal in mind — giving old and low-resource computers a new lease on life

                                          Loss32 began as a personal project by a group of open-source enthusiasts frustrated with how quickly modern software has moved past older machines.

                                          The name Loss32 stems from its focus on “losing” unnecessary bloat — keeping only what’s essential — and the fact that it targets 32-bit and low-resource systems that many other distros are abandoning.

                                          is this entire thing an AI hallucination? it's genuinely unbelievably bad, there's basically no relation whatsoever to anything I wrote on loss32.org

                                          ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #48

                                          @moses_izumi @hikari I see "George" has done it again!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups