Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
72 Posts 31 Posters 121 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

    to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

    https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

    craftyguy@freeradical.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
    craftyguy@freeradical.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
    craftyguy@freeradical.zone
    wrote last edited by
    #25

    @ariadne wow, that was painful to read. Literally.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

      to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

      https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

      aissen@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
      aissen@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
      aissen@social.treehouse.systems
      wrote last edited by
      #26

      @ariadne 12 bullet lists in an article ? I love them as much as the next person, but even I know not to abuse them. No serious editor would have let this pass, seriously this is slop without even as much as a review pass.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
      • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

        to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

        https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

        msh@coales.coM This user is from outside of this forum
        msh@coales.coM This user is from outside of this forum
        msh@coales.co
        wrote last edited by
        #27

        @ariadne TBH its hard to tell the difference between the slop excreted by Lunduke and that from an LLM these days they seem to have been converging over the years

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

          to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

          https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

          donelias@mastodon.crD This user is from outside of this forum
          donelias@mastodon.crD This user is from outside of this forum
          donelias@mastodon.cr
          wrote last edited by
          #28

          @ariadne

          What a shame to have one's name in a masthead of a slop publication machine
          https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/masthead

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

            what alpine *has* done is ship the systemd unit files included with upstream packages in aports. and this is not new, we have been doing this for a while now.

            alpine *also* ships some systemd components as isolated components, such as systemd-boot. we may also use systemd's udev in the future as well.

            but these are, and in the case of udev, would be properly integrated into alpine, not the other way around.

            aelspire@aelspire.infoA This user is from outside of this forum
            aelspire@aelspire.infoA This user is from outside of this forum
            aelspire@aelspire.info
            wrote last edited by
            #29

            @ariadne Woho! Thanks for considering using udev in Alpine! It was the thing which forced me to return to Arch, while I would prefer to use Alpine. I've tried to use mdev + libudev-zero but it had a lot of quirks, so I switched to eudev but it had problems with mounting encrypted USB drives and some other quirks, so I tried to just use mount, but while on (some?) BSDs you can allow mount without root when user have permissions for both a device and a mount point, Linux does not.

            Almost everything depends on libudev…

            ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

              to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

              https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

              lkundrak@metalhead.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
              lkundrak@metalhead.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
              lkundrak@metalhead.club
              wrote last edited by
              #30

              @ariadne "this looks like a normal article to me"

              -- high school bullies who couldn't write an essay and never figured out why they got an E

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                @ariadne you can use systemd-udevd separately?

                zyx@social.treehouse.systemsZ This user is from outside of this forum
                zyx@social.treehouse.systemsZ This user is from outside of this forum
                zyx@social.treehouse.systems
                wrote last edited by
                #31

                @whitequark @ariadne yep Gentoo has been packaging systemd-{tmpfiles,udevd,boot} separately on OpenRC systems for a long while.

                whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • zyx@social.treehouse.systemsZ zyx@social.treehouse.systems

                  @whitequark @ariadne yep Gentoo has been packaging systemd-{tmpfiles,udevd,boot} separately on OpenRC systems for a long while.

                  whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                  whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                  whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                  wrote last edited by
                  #32

                  @zyx @ariadne I had assumed the eudev fork needed to happen bc this wasn't possible

                  ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA eschwartz@fosstodon.orgE 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                    @zyx @ariadne I had assumed the eudev fork needed to happen bc this wasn't possible

                    ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
                    wrote last edited by
                    #33

                    @zyx @whitequark at one point in time it was necessary, but it's a lot easier now with meson.

                    dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                      @zyx @whitequark at one point in time it was necessary, but it's a lot easier now with meson.

                      dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dysfun@social.treehouse.systems
                      wrote last edited by
                      #34

                      @ariadne how does meson help here? just out of curiosity

                      ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD dysfun@social.treehouse.systems

                        @ariadne how does meson help here? just out of curiosity

                        ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                        ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                        ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
                        wrote last edited by
                        #35

                        @dysfun we can easily build specific subcomponents of systemd with meson while still getting the internal dependencies right. with autotools it was a nightmare.

                        dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                          @dysfun we can easily build specific subcomponents of systemd with meson while still getting the internal dependencies right. with autotools it was a nightmare.

                          dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dysfun@social.treehouse.systems
                          wrote last edited by
                          #36

                          @ariadne makes sense

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                            to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

                            https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

                            coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC This user is from outside of this forum
                            coolbean@brain.worm.pinkC This user is from outside of this forum
                            coolbean@brain.worm.pink
                            wrote last edited by
                            #37
                            @ariadne lmfao the hoax generators be generating hoaxes
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                            • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                              to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

                              https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

                              moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                              moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                              moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #38
                              @ariadne
                              Linux Urinal also slopped out an article that misrepresented Loss32 (project for running Wine as the primary desktop environment, 'cause it's easier and more helpful than making endless Wine frontends) as just another "modern Linux for 32-bit notebooks"-project.

                              I hope @hikari is as disappointed as I am
                              hikari@social.noyu.meH 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                                to be absolutely clear: alpine is *not* switching to systemd or implementing a 'systemd compatibility layer'.

                                https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alpine-linux-experiments-systemd-compatibility-while-keeping-its-lightweight-identity is literally AI slop

                                arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                arcaneoverflow@techhub.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #39

                                @ariadne I'm glad to hear it 🙂 I was looking for a tidier and more focussed disti some time ago, and looking more closely I should probably have chosen Alpine 🙂

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • neal@social.gompa.meN neal@social.gompa.me

                                  @ariadne Yeah, it's probably going to happen with something particularly dumb too. I can already see it coming...

                                  techokami@woof.techT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  techokami@woof.techT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  techokami@woof.tech
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #40

                                  @neal @ariadne I thought Linux Journal shut down long ago, is this some AI slop zombie wearing its skin?

                                  brad@1040ste.netB 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • techokami@woof.techT techokami@woof.tech

                                    @neal @ariadne I thought Linux Journal shut down long ago, is this some AI slop zombie wearing its skin?

                                    brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    brad@1040ste.net
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #41

                                    @techokami @neal @ariadne Take a look at the "About Us" page, no mention of the current people. The listed-as-former staff last contributed around 2019...

                                    techokami@woof.techT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org
                                      @ariadne
                                      Linux Urinal also slopped out an article that misrepresented Loss32 (project for running Wine as the primary desktop environment, 'cause it's easier and more helpful than making endless Wine frontends) as just another "modern Linux for 32-bit notebooks"-project.

                                      I hope @hikari is as disappointed as I am
                                      hikari@social.noyu.meH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hikari@social.noyu.meH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hikari@social.noyu.me
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #42

                                      @moses_izumi @ariadne do link the article to remind me?

                                      moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • hikari@social.noyu.meH hikari@social.noyu.me

                                        @moses_izumi @ariadne do link the article to remind me?

                                        moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #43
                                        @hikari @ariadne
                                        here:

                                        https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/introducing-loss32-new-lightweight-linux-distro-focus-legacy-hardware
                                        hikari@social.noyu.meH 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org
                                          @hikari @ariadne
                                          here:

                                          https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/introducing-loss32-new-lightweight-linux-distro-focus-legacy-hardware
                                          hikari@social.noyu.meH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          hikari@social.noyu.meH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          hikari@social.noyu.me
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #44

                                          @moses_izumi @ariadne

                                          a lightweight operating system built from scratch with one goal in mind — giving old and low-resource computers a new lease on life

                                          Loss32 began as a personal project by a group of open-source enthusiasts frustrated with how quickly modern software has moved past older machines.

                                          The name Loss32 stems from its focus on “losing” unnecessary bloat — keeping only what’s essential — and the fact that it targets 32-bit and low-resource systems that many other distros are abandoning.

                                          is this entire thing an AI hallucination? it's genuinely unbelievably bad, there's basically no relation whatsoever to anything I wrote on loss32.org

                                          ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups