Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 9GW datacentre approved.

9GW datacentre approved.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
109 Posts 68 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

    9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

    Link Preview Image
    New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

    The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

    favicon

    Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

    catwoman69y2k@meow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    catwoman69y2k@meow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    catwoman69y2k@meow.social
    wrote last edited by
    #41

    @quixoticgeek ...and it will be the people of Utah who will pay the bill (higher electricity bills, issues with water supply and pressure, etc...)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • quoidian@mastodon.onlineQ quoidian@mastodon.online

      @Seb1982 @quixoticgeek
      Disable the cooling system.

      mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
      mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
      mycotropic@beige.party
      wrote last edited by
      #42

      @quoidian @Seb1982 @quixoticgeek

      #Zodiac was a good book.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ehproque@neopaquita.esE ehproque@neopaquita.es

        @quixoticgeek how much water then? Where's it coming from?

        mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
        mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
        mycotropic@beige.party
        wrote last edited by
        #43

        @ehproque @quixoticgeek

        See the Colorado River is filled up with water from snow melt that's is eternal, neverending and limitless so.......

        ehproque@neopaquita.esE 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

          9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

          Link Preview Image
          New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

          The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

          favicon

          Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

          mugsysrapsheet@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mugsysrapsheet@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mugsysrapsheet@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #44

          @quixoticgeek
          Countries need to require all #DataCenters to generate their own (#green) electricity (and only use water-free cooling.)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mighty_orbot@retro.pizzaM mighty_orbot@retro.pizza

            @quixoticgeek “2,000 permanent jobs in the county following construction”? Doing what, sweeping the halls?

            mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
            mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
            mycotropic@beige.party
            wrote last edited by
            #45

            @mighty_orbot @quixoticgeek

            Licking the wire harnesses clean!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • remittancegirl@mstdn.socialR remittancegirl@mstdn.social

              @quixoticgeek And not a single panel of solar?

              And... when it fails, will they turn it into another detention centre for people they don't like?

              mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
              mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
              mycotropic@beige.party
              wrote last edited by
              #46

              @Remittancegirl @quixoticgeek

              GPUs are going to be used for paving roads!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                Link Preview Image
                New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                favicon

                Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                bouriquet@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                bouriquet@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                bouriquet@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #47

                @quixoticgeek That means 6GW of heat get dissipated into the atmosphere one way or another. Energy is neither created nor destroyed, just released into the atmosphere from where it was bound up as natural gas.
                What’s the impact of 6GW of additional heat on the climate?

                iwein@mas.toI 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                  9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                  Link Preview Image
                  New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                  The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                  favicon

                  Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                  zompetto@mastodon.artZ This user is from outside of this forum
                  zompetto@mastodon.artZ This user is from outside of this forum
                  zompetto@mastodon.art
                  wrote last edited by
                  #48

                  @quixoticgeek as Ed Zitron loves to remind us, _approved_ does not mean it will ever get built.

                  This will be fought tooth and nail at every inch of the process.

                  - YouTube

                  Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.

                  favicon

                  (www.youtube.com)

                  Edit: fixed the name! Added a link.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                    Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                    Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                    The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                    naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                    naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                    naturemc@mastodon.online
                    wrote last edited by
                    #49

                    @quixoticgeek plus the use of drinking water. In Spain, they already have desertification made by a data center ...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • shivviness@beige.partyS shivviness@beige.party

                      @quixoticgeek

                      People need to understand that these datacentres are not just for generating fun pics, they're intended to replace workers en masse, and they're going to ultimately replaces wages.

                      And there's no way Universal Basic Income will be even considered, and notwithstanding the BS that Musk has been spouting recently in favour of UBI.

                      pst@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pst@tldr.nettime.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pst@tldr.nettime.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #50

                      @Shivviness
                      Add to this the surveillance/analysis/control (Palantir) that will be run on these systems.

                      @quixoticgeek

                      shivviness@beige.partyS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo

                        @quixoticgeek hang on the thing runs on gas, so an f1 engine gives a vague idea of how much gas its going to need. ~A Saturn five first stage fuel tank every fifteen minutes (rounding to a nice round number)

                        If you've ever seen a person standing next to a Saturn five you have an idea how utterly absurd an amount of fuel that is.

                        With out the pipeline that places shuts down. And we thought the back hoe through the fiber link was a bad problem.

                        profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
                        profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
                        profpatsch@mastodon.xyz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #51

                        @mindpersephone @quixoticgeek Okay those comparisons are kind of really unusable, you should compare a GW to the average electricity use of about 1 million homes (without heating/cooling)

                        profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP profpatsch@mastodon.xyz

                          @mindpersephone @quixoticgeek Okay those comparisons are kind of really unusable, you should compare a GW to the average electricity use of about 1 million homes (without heating/cooling)

                          profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
                          profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
                          profpatsch@mastodon.xyz
                          wrote last edited by
                          #52

                          @mindpersephone @quixoticgeek The question here is if there’s a market to this much compute, do you think the average person will consume an extra 1kW for inference in 2030? Maybe in the US where natural gas is free right now.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • pst@tldr.nettime.orgP pst@tldr.nettime.org

                            @Shivviness
                            Add to this the surveillance/analysis/control (Palantir) that will be run on these systems.

                            @quixoticgeek

                            shivviness@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                            shivviness@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                            shivviness@beige.party
                            wrote last edited by
                            #53

                            @pst @quixoticgeek

                            Precisely.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                              @CppGuy you'd need 45km² of solar to generate 9GW or solar, but assuming the sun is only out for a ⅓rd of the time, you'd probably need closer to 135km², plus the battery storage...

                              moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                              moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                              moopet@toot.cafe
                              wrote last edited by
                              #54

                              @quixoticgeek @CppGuy make the solar array 1km wide and run it around the equator. Punctuate it with datacentres every 45km and turn them on and off as the sun goes around. Simple.

                              quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • moopet@toot.cafeM moopet@toot.cafe

                                @quixoticgeek @CppGuy make the solar array 1km wide and run it around the equator. Punctuate it with datacentres every 45km and turn them on and off as the sun goes around. Simple.

                                quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                                wrote last edited by
                                #55

                                @moopet @CppGuy datacentre workloads are not despatchable. Also most of the equator is under water.

                                moopet@toot.cafeM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                  @moopet @CppGuy datacentre workloads are not despatchable. Also most of the equator is under water.

                                  moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  moopet@toot.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  moopet@toot.cafe
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #56

                                  @quixoticgeek @CppGuy they can fill floats with natural gas and extend the road over the sea.

                                  andniz@c.imA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                    Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                                    Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                                    The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                                    timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    timwardcam@c.im
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #57

                                    @quixoticgeek But if it's in a desert it's using locally produced solar power with zero emissions, isn't it?

                                    vatvslpr@c.imV 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                      9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                      The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                      favicon

                                      Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                      accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      accordionbruce@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #58

                                      @quixoticgeek @inthehands
                                      They just need to add a geothermal plant to run on the extreme heat generated by the data center

                                      And feed that power back to run the data center ♻️

                                      Free energy! ⚡️

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP peteriskrisjanis@toot.lv

                                        @freya @quixoticgeek yeah this pretty much a scam project, considering that AI usage is falling and crash is inevitable

                                        lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        lovemakeshare@sunny.garden
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #59

                                        @peteriskrisjanis @freya @quixoticgeek This was my immediate reaction. Almost none of these projects are actually building anything - it's all an imitation of growth on paper.

                                        I miss when these companies made things.

                                        Also on behalf of Canada I apologize for Kevin O'Leary, although he has tried his best to distance himself from us for decades.

                                        jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                          9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                          The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                          favicon

                                          Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                          twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          twipped@twipped.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #60

                                          @quixoticgeek it's running on methane, so it emits NOx and SOx instead of CO2.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups