Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 9GW datacentre approved.

9GW datacentre approved.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
109 Posts 68 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF ferricoxide@blahaj.zone

    @quixoticgeek@v.st

    Sounds not unlike what's going on in the US.

    Datacenter builders love deserts:

    * Land is cheap

    * Large, contiguous chunks of land are easier to come by

    * Fewer neighbors to contend with

    * Generally less stuff that needs to be bulldozed to build the datacenter, itself, and the infrastructure that feeds it.

    quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
    quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
    quixoticgeek@social.v.st
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    @ferricoxide Utah being in the US. Yes, it's very similar to what's going on in the US...

    ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

      9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

      Link Preview Image
      New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

      The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

      favicon

      Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

      mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
      mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
      mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      @quixoticgeek that's ~45 CERNs?! WTF?

      Forty five of the thing they joked might be able to create a black hole and end the world, in a single site?

      ~ one Saturn 5 F1 main engine burning constantly for the life time of the site not just a few hundred seconds

      This is a stupid amount of energy use.

      mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

        @ferricoxide Utah being in the US. Yes, it's very similar to what's going on in the US...

        ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
        ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
        ferricoxide@blahaj.zone
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        @quixoticgeek@v.st

        Oop. I saw the UK mention and didn't see that my instance had hidden the link behind a "more" button. So, assumed reference was to the UK allowing similar idiocy to what's going on in the US.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

          Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

          Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

          The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

          woe2you@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
          woe2you@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
          woe2you@beige.party
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @quixoticgeek Cast iron proof that it's a boondoggle: they're powering it with fossil fuels because they know the bubble will burst before the TTBE of renewables.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo

            @quixoticgeek that's ~45 CERNs?! WTF?

            Forty five of the thing they joked might be able to create a black hole and end the world, in a single site?

            ~ one Saturn 5 F1 main engine burning constantly for the life time of the site not just a few hundred seconds

            This is a stupid amount of energy use.

            mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
            mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
            mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @quixoticgeek hang on the thing runs on gas, so an f1 engine gives a vague idea of how much gas its going to need. ~A Saturn five first stage fuel tank every fifteen minutes (rounding to a nice round number)

            If you've ever seen a person standing next to a Saturn five you have an idea how utterly absurd an amount of fuel that is.

            With out the pipeline that places shuts down. And we thought the back hoe through the fiber link was a bad problem.

            profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF ferricoxide@blahaj.zone

              @quixoticgeek@v.st

              Sounds not unlike what's going on in the US.

              Datacenter builders love deserts:

              * Land is cheap

              * Large, contiguous chunks of land are easier to come by

              * Fewer neighbors to contend with

              * Generally less stuff that needs to be bulldozed to build the datacenter, itself, and the infrastructure that feeds it.

              marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
              marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
              marjolica@social.linux.pizza
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @ferricoxide @quixoticgeek "Datacenter builders love deserts"

              ..and deserts usually have such a plentiful supply of water for cooling.

              Presumably they will take the water from Lake Powell?

              Link Preview Image
              The costs of surging water into drought-depleted Lake Powell will be widespread

              Lake Powell is at just 23% capacity and approaching the point where water won't be able to flow into its hydroelectric turbines without air causing damage.

              favicon

              KUER (www.kuer.org)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • syklemil@snabelen.noS syklemil@snabelen.no

                @quixoticgeek
                Solar & wind are still cheaper than gas though, so still a weird choice
                @CppGuy

                cppguy@infosec.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                cppguy@infosec.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
                cppguy@infosec.space
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @syklemil @quixoticgeek

                They're building the thing in a desert, i.e. an expanse of unused space. If they had to build this monstrosity at all, they could have used some of that space for renewable energy generation.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • syklemil@snabelen.noS syklemil@snabelen.no

                  @quixoticgeek
                  Solar & wind are still cheaper than gas though, so still a weird choice
                  @CppGuy

                  brokar@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  brokar@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  brokar@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @syklemil @quixoticgeek @CppGuy

                  They will be building power plants for that because no state has 9GW power lying around or spare, not even talking about the cables and infrastructure you'd need to even get the energy there.
                  And since this is a desert, i assume there isn't much water around for cooling.
                  Also, i can only guess the number of backup generators they'd need to secure operation. Gas powered of course. And are they talking about carbon neutrality? Being the good greenwashing company?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                    9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                    Link Preview Image
                    New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                    The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                    favicon

                    Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                    artemis@climatejustice.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    artemis@climatejustice.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    artemis@climatejustice.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @quixoticgeek and isn't 'natural gas' just the most newspeak name for a fossil fuel.

                    quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • artemis@climatejustice.socialA artemis@climatejustice.social

                      @quixoticgeek and isn't 'natural gas' just the most newspeak name for a fossil fuel.

                      quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                      quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                      quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @artemis ok. So natural gas is because for many years the gas network in most places was derived from coal gas, or town gas, whereby coal was heated up to produce coke, which was used in things like steel production, and the gas was then piped locally to homes and businesses. Natural gas as a fuel source is relatively recent. In the UK we're talking later half of the 20th century.

                      artemis@climatejustice.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                        9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                        Link Preview Image
                        New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                        The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                        favicon

                        Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                        shivviness@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                        shivviness@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                        shivviness@beige.party
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @quixoticgeek

                        People need to understand that these datacentres are not just for generating fun pics, they're intended to replace workers en masse, and they're going to ultimately replaces wages.

                        And there's no way Universal Basic Income will be even considered, and notwithstanding the BS that Musk has been spouting recently in favour of UBI.

                        pst@tldr.nettime.orgP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • seb1982@norden.socialS seb1982@norden.social

                          @quixoticgeek I would like to bring in a completely different aspect:
                          As the data centre runs entirely on natural gas, sabotaging the whole facility seems to be quite an easy thing to do.

                          quoidian@mastodon.onlineQ This user is from outside of this forum
                          quoidian@mastodon.onlineQ This user is from outside of this forum
                          quoidian@mastodon.online
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          @Seb1982 @quixoticgeek
                          Disable the cooling system.

                          mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                            9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                            Link Preview Image
                            New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                            The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                            favicon

                            Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                            carstenfranke@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            carstenfranke@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            carstenfranke@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #27

                            @quixoticgeek and there is an even bigger one planned .. link in the article.
                            I am really not sure where the money will be to pay for all this computing...

                            Link Preview Image
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                              9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                              Link Preview Image
                              New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                              The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                              favicon

                              Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                              phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              phl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              phl@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #28

                              @quixoticgeek Just the thing we need in the middle of a climate crisis.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                Link Preview Image
                                New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                favicon

                                Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                marud@social.marud.frM This user is from outside of this forum
                                marud@social.marud.frM This user is from outside of this forum
                                marud@social.marud.fr
                                wrote last edited by
                                #29

                                @quixoticgeek this is so painful to read 😢

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                  9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                  The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                  favicon

                                  Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                  ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ehproque@neopaquita.es
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #30

                                  @quixoticgeek how much water then? Where's it coming from?

                                  quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ mycotropic@beige.partyM dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD 3 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ehproque@neopaquita.esE ehproque@neopaquita.es

                                    @quixoticgeek how much water then? Where's it coming from?

                                    quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #31

                                    @ehproque dunno. I'm scared of the answer.

                                    cppguy@infosec.spaceC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                      9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                      The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                      favicon

                                      Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                      sassinake@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sassinake@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sassinake@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #32

                                      @quixoticgeek

                                      Now that the tech exists to generate fabulous amounts of energy, tech and energy oligarchs immediately found ways to waste it to keep it out of the peasants' reach.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                        9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                        The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                        favicon

                                        Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                        mighty_orbot@retro.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mighty_orbot@retro.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mighty_orbot@retro.pizza
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #33

                                        @quixoticgeek “2,000 permanent jobs in the county following construction”? Doing what, sweeping the halls?

                                        mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                          9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                          The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                          favicon

                                          Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                          evoscale@c.imE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          evoscale@c.imE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          evoscale@c.im
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #34

                                          @quixoticgeek At scale, such a powerful root infrastructure would require more than one source, like geothermal and wind, to justify such an amount. But placing a singular sourcing is an obvious liability with no backup/complimentary framework. It's like putting a large heavy water nuclear reactor in place, instead of smaller, overlapping modular Thorium, or Natrium reactors.

                                          Simply just another #TechBros money-grab, at the taxpayer's expense.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups