Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 9GW datacentre approved.

9GW datacentre approved.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
109 Posts 68 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
    quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
    quixoticgeek@social.v.st
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

    Link Preview Image
    New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

    The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

    favicon

    Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

    quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB cppguy@infosec.spaceC seb1982@norden.socialS ra@mstdn.socialR 43 Replies Last reply
    2
    0
    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

      9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

      Link Preview Image
      New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

      The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

      favicon

      Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

      quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
      quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
      quixoticgeek@social.v.st
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

      Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

      The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

      bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB freya@social.highenergymagic.netF woe2you@beige.partyW Y naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 9 Replies Last reply
      0
      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

        9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

        Link Preview Image
        New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

        The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

        favicon

        Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

        babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
        babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
        babe@glitterkitten.co.uk
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @quixoticgeek Holy yikes

        quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • babe@glitterkitten.co.ukB babe@glitterkitten.co.uk

          @quixoticgeek Holy yikes

          quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
          quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
          quixoticgeek@social.v.st
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @babe yep.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

            9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

            Link Preview Image
            New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

            The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

            favicon

            Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

            cppguy@infosec.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
            cppguy@infosec.spaceC This user is from outside of this forum
            cppguy@infosec.space
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @quixoticgeek

            Yeah, but it's even worse than that. The UK grid is decarbonising, but the article says this new #DataCentre will run entirely on natural gas, i.e. fossil fuels. Right now, about an eighth of UK electricity is generated from fossil fuels:

            https://grid.iamkate.com/

            So the new DC will emit about twice as much carbon as all the UK's electricity generation.

            Does the sun not shine in Utah? Does the wind not blow in the desert? Is the climate not changing as fast as the Americans would like? 😡

            #AI #DataCenter #ClimateCrisis

            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

              9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

              Link Preview Image
              New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

              The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

              favicon

              Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

              seb1982@norden.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              seb1982@norden.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              seb1982@norden.social
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @quixoticgeek I would like to bring in a completely different aspect:
              As the data centre runs entirely on natural gas, sabotaging the whole facility seems to be quite an easy thing to do.

              P quoidian@mastodon.onlineQ 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • cppguy@infosec.spaceC cppguy@infosec.space

                @quixoticgeek

                Yeah, but it's even worse than that. The UK grid is decarbonising, but the article says this new #DataCentre will run entirely on natural gas, i.e. fossil fuels. Right now, about an eighth of UK electricity is generated from fossil fuels:

                https://grid.iamkate.com/

                So the new DC will emit about twice as much carbon as all the UK's electricity generation.

                Does the sun not shine in Utah? Does the wind not blow in the desert? Is the climate not changing as fast as the Americans would like? 😡

                #AI #DataCenter #ClimateCrisis

                quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @CppGuy you'd need 45km² of solar to generate 9GW or solar, but assuming the sun is only out for a ⅓rd of the time, you'd probably need closer to 135km², plus the battery storage...

                syklemil@snabelen.noS moopet@toot.cafeM 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                  Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                  Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                  The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                  bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bashstkid@mastodon.online
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @quixoticgeek Perhaps if the changed weather patterns included a few tornadoes?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                    9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                    Link Preview Image
                    New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                    The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                    favicon

                    Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                    ra@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ra@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ra@mstdn.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @quixoticgeek disperse invasive mollusks upstream and use the intake of the plant to 'filter' the water.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • seb1982@norden.socialS seb1982@norden.social

                      @quixoticgeek I would like to bring in a completely different aspect:
                      As the data centre runs entirely on natural gas, sabotaging the whole facility seems to be quite an easy thing to do.

                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      phosphenes@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @Seb1982 @quixoticgeek

                      It's a sitting duck for drones.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                        Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                        Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                        The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                        freya@social.highenergymagic.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                        freya@social.highenergymagic.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                        freya@social.highenergymagic.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @quixoticgeek lol 9GW, that'll never get built. they can barely get 1GW DCs off the bloody ground, half of them are literally piles of scrap metal and construction trash, last I checked. worst this'll do, funnel a bunch of bloody money to some kind of AI DC construction company that's entirely a scam, and go precisely nowhere.

                        peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                          @CppGuy you'd need 45km² of solar to generate 9GW or solar, but assuming the sun is only out for a ⅓rd of the time, you'd probably need closer to 135km², plus the battery storage...

                          syklemil@snabelen.noS This user is from outside of this forum
                          syklemil@snabelen.noS This user is from outside of this forum
                          syklemil@snabelen.no
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @quixoticgeek
                          Solar & wind are still cheaper than gas though, so still a weird choice
                          @CppGuy

                          cppguy@infosec.spaceC brokar@mastodon.socialB mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • freya@social.highenergymagic.netF freya@social.highenergymagic.net

                            @quixoticgeek lol 9GW, that'll never get built. they can barely get 1GW DCs off the bloody ground, half of them are literally piles of scrap metal and construction trash, last I checked. worst this'll do, funnel a bunch of bloody money to some kind of AI DC construction company that's entirely a scam, and go precisely nowhere.

                            peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP This user is from outside of this forum
                            peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP This user is from outside of this forum
                            peteriskrisjanis@toot.lv
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @freya @quixoticgeek yeah this pretty much a scam project, considering that AI usage is falling and crash is inevitable

                            lovemakeshare@sunny.gardenL 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                              9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                              Link Preview Image
                              New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                              The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                              favicon

                              Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                              ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                              ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                              ferricoxide@blahaj.zone
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @quixoticgeek@v.st

                              Sounds not unlike what's going on in the US.

                              Datacenter builders love deserts:

                              * Land is cheap

                              * Large, contiguous chunks of land are easier to come by

                              * Fewer neighbors to contend with

                              * Generally less stuff that needs to be bulldozed to build the datacenter, itself, and the infrastructure that feeds it.

                              quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF ferricoxide@blahaj.zone

                                @quixoticgeek@v.st

                                Sounds not unlike what's going on in the US.

                                Datacenter builders love deserts:

                                * Land is cheap

                                * Large, contiguous chunks of land are easier to come by

                                * Fewer neighbors to contend with

                                * Generally less stuff that needs to be bulldozed to build the datacenter, itself, and the infrastructure that feeds it.

                                quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                @ferricoxide Utah being in the US. Yes, it's very similar to what's going on in the US...

                                ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                  9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                                  The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                                  favicon

                                  Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                                  mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @quixoticgeek that's ~45 CERNs?! WTF?

                                  Forty five of the thing they joked might be able to create a black hole and end the world, in a single site?

                                  ~ one Saturn 5 F1 main engine burning constantly for the life time of the site not just a few hundred seconds

                                  This is a stupid amount of energy use.

                                  mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                    @ferricoxide Utah being in the US. Yes, it's very similar to what's going on in the US...

                                    ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ferricoxide@blahaj.zone
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @quixoticgeek@v.st

                                    Oop. I saw the UK mention and didn't see that my instance had hidden the link behind a "more" button. So, assumed reference was to the UK allowing similar idiocy to what's going on in the US.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                      Based on an estimate of 500g CO2/kWh, the one facility would emit ~40MT of CO2 a year. If this one facility was a country, it would rank about 67th, just behind Bulgaria.

                                      Concentrating this much energy use in a single location is going to change weather patterns. The environmental impact is just mind boggling.

                                      The AI bubble can't burst soon enough.

                                      woe2you@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      woe2you@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      woe2you@beige.party
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @quixoticgeek Cast iron proof that it's a boondoggle: they're powering it with fossil fuels because they know the bubble will burst before the TTBE of renewables.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo

                                        @quixoticgeek that's ~45 CERNs?! WTF?

                                        Forty five of the thing they joked might be able to create a black hole and end the world, in a single site?

                                        ~ one Saturn 5 F1 main engine burning constantly for the life time of the site not just a few hundred seconds

                                        This is a stupid amount of energy use.

                                        mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mindpersephone@spookygirl.booM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mindpersephone@spookygirl.boo
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @quixoticgeek hang on the thing runs on gas, so an f1 engine gives a vague idea of how much gas its going to need. ~A Saturn five first stage fuel tank every fifteen minutes (rounding to a nice round number)

                                        If you've ever seen a person standing next to a Saturn five you have an idea how utterly absurd an amount of fuel that is.

                                        With out the pipeline that places shuts down. And we thought the back hoe through the fiber link was a bad problem.

                                        profpatsch@mastodon.xyzP 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF ferricoxide@blahaj.zone

                                          @quixoticgeek@v.st

                                          Sounds not unlike what's going on in the US.

                                          Datacenter builders love deserts:

                                          * Land is cheap

                                          * Large, contiguous chunks of land are easier to come by

                                          * Fewer neighbors to contend with

                                          * Generally less stuff that needs to be bulldozed to build the datacenter, itself, and the infrastructure that feeds it.

                                          marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          marjolica@social.linux.pizza
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @ferricoxide @quixoticgeek "Datacenter builders love deserts"

                                          ..and deserts usually have such a plentiful supply of water for cooling.

                                          Presumably they will take the water from Lake Powell?

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          The costs of surging water into drought-depleted Lake Powell will be widespread

                                          Lake Powell is at just 23% capacity and approaching the point where water won't be able to flow into its hydroelectric turbines without air causing damage.

                                          favicon

                                          KUER (www.kuer.org)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups