Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’ve been thinking about this for days.

I’ve been thinking about this for days.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
35 Posts 29 Posters 21 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

    (Via @jonathankoren )

    Link Preview Image
    arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    arcaneoverflow@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    arcaneoverflow@techhub.social
    wrote last edited by
    #23

    @mhoye @jonathankoren Snort! 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

      (Via @jonathankoren )

      Link Preview Image
      mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
      mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
      mehrad@fosstodon.org
      wrote last edited by
      #24

      @mhoye
      @jonathankoren
      It is one of the best one-class classifier I've ever seen. Extremely efficient and the computational time doesn't grow the larger the input gets.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

        (Via @jonathankoren )

        Link Preview Image
        ingonymous@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        ingonymous@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        ingonymous@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #25

        @mhoye @Nephele @jonathankoren
        That's prime crime

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

          (Via @jonathankoren )

          Link Preview Image
          stylus@social.afront.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
          stylus@social.afront.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
          stylus@social.afront.org
          wrote last edited by
          #26

          @mhoye @silicatefondue @jonathankoren this class of algorithm is called the stopped clock algorithm. It joins the previously identified Monte Carlo and las Vegas algorithms.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

            I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

            (Via @jonathankoren )

            Link Preview Image
            http@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
            http@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
            http@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #27

            @mhoye @jonathankoren If you change that to:
            return !(x&1);
            You have improved the probability quite a lot and still fast and won't get optimized away.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

              I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

              (Via @jonathankoren )

              Link Preview Image
              mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
              mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
              mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
              wrote last edited by
              #28
              @mhoye @jonathankoren amazing, we've discovered prime numbers past 2
              mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ jonathankoren@sfba.social

                @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                mschomm@bonn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mschomm@bonn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mschomm@bonn.social
                wrote last edited by
                #29

                @jonathankoren Is there a use case for Bogosort?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mjdxp@labyrinth.zoneM mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
                  @mhoye @jonathankoren amazing, we've discovered prime numbers past 2
                  mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mhoye@cosocial.ca
                  wrote last edited by
                  #30

                  @mjdxp @jonathankoren This changes everything!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • finestructure@mastodon.socialF finestructure@mastodon.social

                    @mhoye @jonathankoren It might be sentient

                    mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mhoye@cosocial.ca
                    wrote last edited by
                    #31

                    @finestructure @jonathankoren oh shit you’re right

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                      (Via @jonathankoren )

                      Link Preview Image
                      yesbait@bsd.networkY This user is from outside of this forum
                      yesbait@bsd.networkY This user is from outside of this forum
                      yesbait@bsd.network
                      wrote last edited by
                      #32

                      @mhoye @jonathankoren can absolutely relate. Constantly trying convince my quantitative colleagues that discrete maths is different from their stochastic and AI based reasoning.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                        (Via @jonathankoren )

                        Link Preview Image
                        tygerkrash@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tygerkrash@mastodon.ieT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tygerkrash@mastodon.ie
                        wrote last edited by
                        #33

                        @mhoye @jonathankoren thats fantastic.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                          (Via @jonathankoren )

                          Link Preview Image
                          thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          thelancashireman@hostux.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #34

                          @mhoye @jonathankoren

                          Reminds me of another ...

                          float sin(float x) { return x; }

                          is remarkably accurate for a large proportion of the possible input values.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                            I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                            (Via @jonathankoren )

                            Link Preview Image
                            execin@x0r.beE This user is from outside of this forum
                            execin@x0r.beE This user is from outside of this forum
                            execin@x0r.be
                            wrote last edited by
                            #35

                            @mhoye @jonathankoren
                            And it’s O(1) too!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups