All right EU law nerds!
-
All right EU law nerds! It’s time for another #EPSO quiz question, by popular demand, we are addressing EU case law.
The case Costa v ENEL (1964) Established which of the following principles? -
All right EU law nerds! It’s time for another #EPSO quiz question, by popular demand, we are addressing EU case law.
The case Costa v ENEL (1964) Established which of the following principles?@hpod16 These quizzes are great! I'm learning a lot (aka have to vote randomly
) -
All right EU law nerds! It’s time for another #EPSO quiz question, by popular demand, we are addressing EU case law.
The case Costa v ENEL (1964) Established which of the following principles?@hpod16 to be honest, for most of the questions I have no clue, but am just guessing, trying to make use of common sense. Yet, till now, the majority of others and I seem to have guessed right, but this one is a tough one
I picked "Supremacy of EU law over national law" simply because it's about two companies, we have had "Mutual recognition" already and I'm not sure what "Direct effect" even stands for
I'm sorry about my ignorance about EU, but your polls sure help me improving
-
@hpod16 to be honest, for most of the questions I have no clue, but am just guessing, trying to make use of common sense. Yet, till now, the majority of others and I seem to have guessed right, but this one is a tough one
I picked "Supremacy of EU law over national law" simply because it's about two companies, we have had "Mutual recognition" already and I'm not sure what "Direct effect" even stands for
I'm sorry about my ignorance about EU, but your polls sure help me improving
@sunnythesheep direct effect means that people in your countries can apply EU law directly in their courts.
Some types of EU legislation have direct effect while others do not. For instance EU directives don’t have direct effect and have to first be transposed into international law by the member states. I always found it ironic that the type of law called a directive doesn’t have direct effect. -
@sunnythesheep direct effect means that people in your countries can apply EU law directly in their courts.
Some types of EU legislation have direct effect while others do not. For instance EU directives don’t have direct effect and have to first be transposed into international law by the member states. I always found it ironic that the type of law called a directive doesn’t have direct effect.@hpod16 thank you, "Some types of EU legislation have direct effect while others do not." summarizes it quite well!
And yeah, haha "I always found it ironic that the type of law called a directive doesn’t have direct effect.", that sounds like an oxymoron to me
-
All right EU law nerds! It’s time for another #EPSO quiz question, by popular demand, we are addressing EU case law.
The case Costa v ENEL (1964) Established which of the following principles?@hpod16 Would Mr Costa have known that his law suit over 20 EUR holds such sway over us? Mrs Defrenne was only told late in life that her name is synonymous with equal pay, apparently her labor union took care of everything -- Unlike Mrs Marckx who petitioned the ECtHR on behalf of her baby with the immortal words "Je suis un bébé de dix mois et je porte plainte contra la Belgique" (equal treatment of kids in or out of marriage)
-
@hpod16 thank you, "Some types of EU legislation have direct effect while others do not." summarizes it quite well!
And yeah, haha "I always found it ironic that the type of law called a directive doesn’t have direct effect.", that sounds like an oxymoron to me
@sunnythesheep
The oxymoron is probably my favourite poetic device… finding the poetry in the driest of subjects is a serious life skill.
-
@sunnythesheep
The oxymoron is probably my favourite poetic device… finding the poetry in the driest of subjects is a serious life skill.RE: https://loops.video/v/dHJeaertSJ
@hpod16 I couldn't agree more
Did you see this quite lavendish 🪻🪻🪻 landscape on Loops?
-
RE: https://loops.video/v/dHJeaertSJ
@hpod16 I couldn't agree more
Did you see this quite lavendish 🪻🪻🪻 landscape on Loops?
RE: https://loops.video/v/6cZEyIPG4u
@hpod16 oh look, another purple
lover, just like you! -
RE: https://loops.video/v/6cZEyIPG4u
@hpod16 oh look, another purple
lover, just like you!@hpod16 actually, as a child, purple was my favorite color, too. Today not so much, anymore, though
-
RE: https://loops.video/v/6cZEyIPG4u
@hpod16 oh look, another purple
lover, just like you!@sunnythesheep
I actually have these flowers at home and regularly serve this purple lemonade to my guests nothing purple escapes my notice -
@sunnythesheep
I actually have these flowers at home and regularly serve this purple lemonade to my guests nothing purple escapes my notice@hpod16 oh, really?
I do have lavender at home, for the scent and cause it helps against moths. -
@hpod16 oh, really?
I do have lavender at home, for the scent and cause it helps against moths.@sunnythesheep these flowers that make a blue tea that turns purple with lemon juice (or any kind of acidity) are called Butterfly Pea Flower
I got mine in Thailand, when I was on holiday -
@sunnythesheep these flowers that make a blue tea that turns purple with lemon juice (or any kind of acidity) are called Butterfly Pea Flower
I got mine in Thailand, when I was on holiday@hpod16 ah, you meant those from the loop. Thanks, I didn't know yet!
"Not allowed for foods in the EU"?
-
I incentive moved this topic from Uncategorized on
-
@hpod16 Would Mr Costa have known that his law suit over 20 EUR holds such sway over us? Mrs Defrenne was only told late in life that her name is synonymous with equal pay, apparently her labor union took care of everything -- Unlike Mrs Marckx who petitioned the ECtHR on behalf of her baby with the immortal words "Je suis un bébé de dix mois et je porte plainte contra la Belgique" (equal treatment of kids in or out of marriage)
Costa was a lawyer and intended from the beginning for his case to be heard before the @Curia, so it's a very different case from Defrenne for sure! But considering that he lost the case I doubt he could have predicted the outcome or the ramifications thereof.
@TimothyRoes @hpod16 -
Costa was a lawyer and intended from the beginning for his case to be heard before the @Curia, so it's a very different case from Defrenne for sure! But considering that he lost the case I doubt he could have predicted the outcome or the ramifications thereof.
@TimothyRoes @hpod16 -
All right EU law nerds! It’s time for another #EPSO quiz question, by popular demand, we are addressing EU case law.
The case Costa v ENEL (1964) Established which of the following principles?The correct answer here is Costa v ENEL (1964). It established the principle of supremacy (precedence) of EU law over conflicting national legislation.
More about the case here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Costa_v_ENEL -
The correct answer here is Costa v ENEL (1964). It established the principle of supremacy (precedence) of EU law over conflicting national legislation.
More about the case here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Costa_v_ENELThe case Van Gend en Loos (1962): Established that EU law creates a "new legal order" granting directly enforceable rights to individuals, not just Member States. This is also called the principle of direct effect.
-
All right EU law nerds! It’s time for another #EPSO quiz question, by popular demand, we are addressing EU case law.
The case Costa v ENEL (1964) Established which of the following principles?@hpod16 I love how the wikipedia entry for Costa v. ENEL demurely notes that: "Costa was assisted by Gian Galeazzo Stendardi, a Milanese lawyer" when in fact...
...Italian plans are measured in centuries.
