I'm sorry.
-
The idea that this is the "best bacterial species" is a huge sign of a grifter btw. The entire idea of a microbiome includes that you need BALANCE. Microbiomes are a fragile ecosystem. "Up and to the right is always better" is absurd here, I'm sorry are we in a corporate board room
@grimalkina Until it said "lab" in the very last sentence, I thought he was *writing* the report before going to bed.
-
@wordshaper this actually might be the least strange thing he's ever posted
-
@wordshaper this actually might be the least strange thing he's ever posted
@grimalkina /me stares blankly off into the distance and quietly walks into the sea
-
More on this plus variation in it: we are learning that whatever sample he is reading, it seems to be incredibly standard for this particular microbiome and these findings simply report measuring the most common thing to measure here that dominates MOST samples
@grimalkina men can't just care about their wives' pleasure without announcing it to the world and inventing a pseudoscientific justification smh.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
"the relative abundance of lactobacilli in the human vagina is typically >70%" ?!?!?!?!?!?!?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/lactobacillus-crispatus
"The most dominant vaginal population is the Lactobacillus species, which comprises nearly 70% of the bacterial community. These include Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus jensenii, etc."
@grimalkina This is not the fact check I was expecting, but I'm delighted by it all the same
-
@grimalkina Until it said "lab" in the very last sentence, I thought he was *writing* the report before going to bed.
@amenonsen @grimalkina Man, this stuff is weird 🤪 Clearly, hygiene prescribes reading the report *before* he gives her the once over. Amateur
-
@KevinCarson1 I'm putting up a psychic damage mental block
-
@grimalkina This is not the fact check I was expecting, but I'm delighted by it all the same
@jawnsy rigor matters everywhere!!!
-
@grimalkina a white tech dude weirdo observing very normative conditions that he is involved in and declaring it to be the best thing possible is super on brand
also jfc what a weird thing [for him] to post
thank you for winning this science trek
@castanea_jo @grimalkina He's a weird guy, it's a strange thing to post, but probably not anywhere near the most unhinged thing he's said. But the fact that anyone pays attention to him is a real indictment of the rest of us lol
-
@thestrangelet oh this is the least of this guy's posts
@grimalkina I've seen a lot of men objectify women, but this is a whole new level.
-
I'm sorry. But I fact checked this. I'm sorry. I had to. I was like?!??!!? I will not let this individual out-science me on this topic IN PARTICULAR. How on earth would we be getting a population-level sample of all these microbiomes to make this estimate. Sample reading skill issue
@grimalkina doing the lordts work
-
More on this plus variation in it: we are learning that whatever sample he is reading, it seems to be incredibly standard for this particular microbiome and these findings simply report measuring the most common thing to measure here that dominates MOST samples
@grimalkina Thanks for the knowledge on this topic.
Why does this guy post such things? -
I'm sorry. But I fact checked this. I'm sorry. I had to. I was like?!??!!? I will not let this individual out-science me on this topic IN PARTICULAR. How on earth would we be getting a population-level sample of all these microbiomes to make this estimate. Sample reading skill issue
@grimalkina cat i just hit some sort of land speed record going from “who the fuck is this person” to “what the fuck is WRONG with this person”
like
-
I'm sorry. But I fact checked this. I'm sorry. I had to. I was like?!??!!? I will not let this individual out-science me on this topic IN PARTICULAR. How on earth would we be getting a population-level sample of all these microbiomes to make this estimate. Sample reading skill issue
Cat. Uh. Wow.
And your comment that this may be the least weird thing they've posted is deeply concerning.
-
More on this plus variation in it: we are learning that whatever sample he is reading, it seems to be incredibly standard for this particular microbiome and these findings simply report measuring the most common thing to measure here that dominates MOST samples
@grimalkina can we also talk about the two tweets that guy put back-to-back?
IS THAT HIS TESTING METHODOLOGY?!?
-
@grimalkina cat i just hit some sort of land speed record going from “who the fuck is this person” to “what the fuck is WRONG with this person”
like
@beep @grimalkina congrats on being one of today's lucky 10,000 I suppose.
-
I'm sorry. But I fact checked this. I'm sorry. I had to. I was like?!??!!? I will not let this individual out-science me on this topic IN PARTICULAR. How on earth would we be getting a population-level sample of all these microbiomes to make this estimate. Sample reading skill issue
@grimalkina bryan johnson’s name is like an entire genre of content warning. maybe 2 or 3 genres at once.
thank you for absolutely torching his pathetic, scientifically illiterate ass here
-
@grimalkina doing the lordts work
@lzg @grimalkina thanks I hate it...
-
I'm sorry. But I fact checked this. I'm sorry. I had to. I was like?!??!!? I will not let this individual out-science me on this topic IN PARTICULAR. How on earth would we be getting a population-level sample of all these microbiomes to make this estimate. Sample reading skill issue
@grimalkina It'd make the @vagina_museum proud.
-
@grimalkina bryan johnson’s name is like an entire genre of content warning. maybe 2 or 3 genres at once.
thank you for absolutely torching his pathetic, scientifically illiterate ass here
@grimalkina (I am so happy for the torching in fact that I am not even gonna be mad that you brought this contemptible fake vampire into my field of view)
