Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "Zelensky says allies asked him to scale back attacks on Russian energy"

"Zelensky says allies asked him to scale back attacks on Russian energy"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
oilgasclimatecrisiszelenskyrussia
72 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

    @Photo55 A blown up barrel of oil has a value of zero dollars, so I agree with you there!

    @mike805 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce

    photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
    photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
    photo55@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #54

    @txtx
    A barrel nobody wants is worth even less.
    Demand destruction is tidier than supply destruction.

    txtx@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • roblosricos@mastodon.socialR roblosricos@mastodon.social

      @Npars01 @benroyce

      Uruguay did what most nations still call impossible: it built a power grid that runs almost entirely on renewables—at half the cost of fossil fuels. The physicist who led that transformation says the same playbook could work anywhere—if governments have the courage to change the rules.

      forbes.com

      favicon

      (www.forbes.com)

      muzicofiel@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
      muzicofiel@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
      muzicofiel@mastodon.nl
      wrote last edited by
      #55

      @ErikJonker een tip voor #Jetten

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

        @benroyce
        China has a very long history.

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #56

        @Photo55

        of course, as a culture

        but we speak of "china" in this context in terms of it as a political entity, which only dates to 1949

        and the shift that led to its embrace of capitalism and its economic rise is even more recent, 1978 and deng xiaoping

        photo55@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • phl@mastodon.socialP phl@mastodon.social

          @benroyce But they never reprimand Russia for blowing up Ukraine's energy infrastructure. That's, apparently, just normal.

          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #57

          @phl

          and russia is aiming at apartment buildings

          dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pg1958@mastodon.sdf.orgP pg1958@mastodon.sdf.org

            @benroyce damn right, burn em to the ground! Could not believe trump regime ordered construction of wind farms shut down and even paid one developer $1B of our tax money to stop construction!

            atlovato@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            atlovato@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            atlovato@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #58

            @pg1958 @benroyce - Like that is truly Messed up. What a Skank.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • pg1958@mastodon.sdf.orgP pg1958@mastodon.sdf.org

              @benroyce damn right, burn em to the ground! Could not believe trump regime ordered construction of wind farms shut down and even paid one developer $1B of our tax money to stop construction!

              atlovato@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              atlovato@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              atlovato@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #59

              @pg1958 @benroyce - Like that is truly Messed up. What a Skank.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

                @txtx
                A barrel nobody wants is worth even less.
                Demand destruction is tidier than supply destruction.

                txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                txtx@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #60

                @Photo55 Why not both?

                photo55@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

                  @Photo55 Why not both?

                  photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  photo55@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #61

                  @txtx as a transitional state, it has some merit.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                    @Photo55

                    of course, as a culture

                    but we speak of "china" in this context in terms of it as a political entity, which only dates to 1949

                    and the shift that led to its embrace of capitalism and its economic rise is even more recent, 1978 and deng xiaoping

                    photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    photo55@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #62

                    @benroyce I suspect the Middle Kingdom hasn't gone away altogether, and a Middle Kingdom and outer barbarians implies an Inner Kingdom.

                    We still have bits of Rome under the Norman underlay, and the various seepages.

                    And it doesn't take me long to get to something from a long time before Rome came here, although how many cultural elements from then hang on. Footpaths and plantings do.

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

                      @benroyce I suspect the Middle Kingdom hasn't gone away altogether, and a Middle Kingdom and outer barbarians implies an Inner Kingdom.

                      We still have bits of Rome under the Norman underlay, and the various seepages.

                      And it doesn't take me long to get to something from a long time before Rome came here, although how many cultural elements from then hang on. Footpaths and plantings do.

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #63

                      @Photo55

                      sure but this is whimsical poetical musings of vague echoes, not contemporary hard political realities

                      what you refer to is ancient echoes. it's an aspect of cultural roots. what that has to do with the political sphere is extremely obscure to the point of irrelevancy

                      china being totalitarian capitalist doesn't have anything to do with the song dynasty's struggles with the jin dynasty

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca

                        @mike805 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce

                        Most petro-state's primary benefit from having fossil fuels is the ability to export them. If the non petro-states transition to renewables (which provides both environmental and national security benefits to them) it cuts off the export markets the petro-states rely on and that will force the petro-states to adopt green technology in turn.

                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        mike805@noc.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #64

                        @RantingCanuck @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce The problem with being a petroleum exporter is that money goes to the rulers of the nation, which therefore do not have to care about their populations.

                        They can spend on either security forces to keep a boot on the public's neck, or handouts to keep them pacified, or some mixture. The rest they just use to live large.

                        They also spend money to manipulate politics elsewhere and keep that game going. The USA is easy to manipulate with money.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                          @phl

                          and russia is aiming at apartment buildings

                          dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                          wrote last edited by
                          #65

                          @benroyce And preschools... @phl

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

                            @Photo55 A blown up barrel of oil has a value of zero dollars, so I agree with you there!

                            @mike805 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce

                            M This user is from outside of this forum
                            M This user is from outside of this forum
                            mike805@noc.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #66

                            @txtx @Photo55 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce Not only that but they are going to pump another barrel somewhere to replace it. So you double the environmental impact.

                            Probably more than double. There is no clean tech on an explosion.

                            txtx@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M mike805@noc.social

                              @txtx @Photo55 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce Not only that but they are going to pump another barrel somewhere to replace it. So you double the environmental impact.

                              Probably more than double. There is no clean tech on an explosion.

                              txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              txtx@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #67

                              @mike805 Well Russia should stop their stupid war then shouldn't they — Putin can then unleash the environmentalist hidden deep inside him and stop pumping all that extra oil.

                              @Photo55 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

                                @mike805 Well Russia should stop their stupid war then shouldn't they — Putin can then unleash the environmentalist hidden deep inside him and stop pumping all that extra oil.

                                @Photo55 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce

                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                mike805@noc.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #68

                                @txtx @Photo55 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce Yeah, not likely. There is no environmentalist inside Putin. He is the best current example of a hard power, militarist, fossil fuel dinosaur powered leader.

                                Green utopia, if it ever exists, will have to figure out how to defend itself against such people. Because both warlike pricks and the dinosaur juice to power their forces will always exist.

                                benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M mike805@noc.social

                                  @txtx @Photo55 @roblosricos @Npars01 @benroyce Yeah, not likely. There is no environmentalist inside Putin. He is the best current example of a hard power, militarist, fossil fuel dinosaur powered leader.

                                  Green utopia, if it ever exists, will have to figure out how to defend itself against such people. Because both warlike pricks and the dinosaur juice to power their forces will always exist.

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #69

                                  @mike805 @txtx @Photo55 @roblosricos @Npars01

                                  fuck green utopia

                                  we're just talking about transitioning off fossil fuels, which will never be 100%

                                  please stop using some vision of perfection as a basis for your words. it's not honest about what the real topic is here

                                  if we make russia be able to field only 10 tanks instead of 100, that matters. that's the point of *transition*. fuck perfection

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                    @mike805 @txtx @Photo55 @roblosricos @Npars01

                                    fuck green utopia

                                    we're just talking about transitioning off fossil fuels, which will never be 100%

                                    please stop using some vision of perfection as a basis for your words. it's not honest about what the real topic is here

                                    if we make russia be able to field only 10 tanks instead of 100, that matters. that's the point of *transition*. fuck perfection

                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mike805@noc.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #70

                                    @benroyce @txtx @Photo55 @roblosricos @Npars01 My point is, installing solar panels is all well and good. But anyone who actually gives up producing and refining fossil fuels is militarily at the mercy of anyone who does not do that.

                                    Using solar for civilian power to free up oil and gas for military preparedness is a good idea.

                                    This fuel shortage will make small scale panel and battery systems very popular in places where people used to use generators. That will have benefits after it's over.

                                    photo55@mastodon.socialP txtx@mastodon.socialT 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M mike805@noc.social

                                      @benroyce @txtx @Photo55 @roblosricos @Npars01 My point is, installing solar panels is all well and good. But anyone who actually gives up producing and refining fossil fuels is militarily at the mercy of anyone who does not do that.

                                      Using solar for civilian power to free up oil and gas for military preparedness is a good idea.

                                      This fuel shortage will make small scale panel and battery systems very popular in places where people used to use generators. That will have benefits after it's over.

                                      photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      photo55@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #71

                                      @mike805
                                      "Fossil".
                                      Finite resource, on the downslope.
                                      Hydrocarbons: a convenient dense energy store.
                                      Alcohols: likewise
                                      Terpenes and so on, likewise.
                                      Ammonia: no CO2, electrosynthetic and biological processes to produce; toxic; feedstock for explosive
                                      Hydrazine: denser; more toxic; atmospheric CO2 plus N2; but, not keen.

                                      Point 1: none, including first, are even synonymous with "fossil".
                                      Point 2: all except NH3 remove CO2 from atmosphere.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M mike805@noc.social

                                        @benroyce @txtx @Photo55 @roblosricos @Npars01 My point is, installing solar panels is all well and good. But anyone who actually gives up producing and refining fossil fuels is militarily at the mercy of anyone who does not do that.

                                        Using solar for civilian power to free up oil and gas for military preparedness is a good idea.

                                        This fuel shortage will make small scale panel and battery systems very popular in places where people used to use generators. That will have benefits after it's over.

                                        txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        txtx@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #72

                                        @mike805 I'm supporting Ukraine blowing up Russian oil infrastructure here — why would you think I expect them to do it on a bicycle?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups