Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. You're probably hearing a lot from Marco Rubio and the US State Department about international law and the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran cannot legally close the Strait.

You're probably hearing a lot from Marco Rubio and the US State Department about international law and the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran cannot legally close the Strait.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
25 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nmba@mstdn.caN nmba@mstdn.ca

    @theleftistlawyer
    Any country that has failed to sign up to the International Criminal Court should have no standing in international law.

    the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    the_wub@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @NMBA @theleftistlawyerd So I guess it is up to Canada to invade the US and depose the illegal government that has been claiming legitimacy the last eighteen months.

    Elbows up!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • theleftistlawyer@mastodon.socialT theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social

      You're probably hearing a lot from Marco Rubio and the US State Department about international law and the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran cannot legally close the Strait. Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, that's true!

      There's just one problem.

      The US never ratified that treaty.

      dougiec3@libretooth.grD This user is from outside of this forum
      dougiec3@libretooth.grD This user is from outside of this forum
      dougiec3@libretooth.gr
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      @theleftistlawyer
      It also withdrew pre-emptively from the International Criminal Court in 2002 when George W. Bush decided it was okay to torture Iraqi prisoners of war.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • theleftistlawyer@mastodon.socialT theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social

        You're probably hearing a lot from Marco Rubio and the US State Department about international law and the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran cannot legally close the Strait. Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, that's true!

        There's just one problem.

        The US never ratified that treaty.

        tkissing@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        tkissing@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        tkissing@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @theleftistlawyer "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Frank Wilhoit

        xeno@hexokina.seX 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • theleftistlawyer@mastodon.socialT theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social

          You're probably hearing a lot from Marco Rubio and the US State Department about international law and the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran cannot legally close the Strait. Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, that's true!

          There's just one problem.

          The US never ratified that treaty.

          infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
          infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
          infoseepage@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @theleftistlawyer And neither did Iran or Israel. Israel never even signed.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • theleftistlawyer@mastodon.socialT theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social

            You're probably hearing a lot from Marco Rubio and the US State Department about international law and the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran cannot legally close the Strait. Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, that's true!

            There's just one problem.

            The US never ratified that treaty.

            infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            infoseepage@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @theleftistlawyer For those that are interested. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parties_to_the_United_Nations_Convention_on_the_Law_of_the_Sea

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • benhm3@saint-paul.usB benhm3@saint-paul.us

              @theleftistlawyer

              Right, legally, one can’t close the airspace over one’s house by firing a machine gun into the air.

              There’s the itty bitty matter of getting one to stop once they start.

              M This user is from outside of this forum
              M This user is from outside of this forum
              mike805@noc.social
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @BenHM3 @theleftistlawyer The Strait is narrow enough to be Iranian territorial waters, as well as Oman on the other side. As I understand it Oman signed a treaty that Iran did not sign.

              The whole concept of territorial waters, the traditional six-mile limit, came from how far one could shoot a cannon from a shore fort.

              International law tends to conform to physical reality since there is no 911 to call when your neighbor pisses on your lawn.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN ninestonesclose@mastodon.social

                @theleftistlawyer the government of the USA of A making up shit as they go along, shoot from the hip, yee haw … dumbasses … doesn’t Israel tell the USA what to do now anyway?

                ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                ahltorp@mastodon.nu
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer If you mean ”Israel controls the US”, that’s a classic antisemitic propaganda trope. If you mean ”Trump does what the last person he spoke to said”, that’s probably true.

                ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

                  @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer If you mean ”Israel controls the US”, that’s a classic antisemitic propaganda trope. If you mean ”Trump does what the last person he spoke to said”, that’s probably true.

                  ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  ninestonesclose@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @ahltorp @theleftistlawyer antisemitism is often used as an excuse by the uneducated and the politicians to shout down anything said these days against the current genocidal expansionist Israeli state. You maybe need to read some books about what antisemitism actually means.

                  ahltorp@mastodon.nuA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN ninestonesclose@mastodon.social

                    @ahltorp @theleftistlawyer antisemitism is often used as an excuse by the uneducated and the politicians to shout down anything said these days against the current genocidal expansionist Israeli state. You maybe need to read some books about what antisemitism actually means.

                    ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ahltorp@mastodon.nu
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer What I wrote was that it’s a ”classic antisemitic propaganda trope”. It’s dangerously close to what some people are saying that’s actually antisemitic, so please tread carefully.

                    ahltorp@mastodon.nuA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

                      @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer What I wrote was that it’s a ”classic antisemitic propaganda trope”. It’s dangerously close to what some people are saying that’s actually antisemitic, so please tread carefully.

                      ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                      ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                      ahltorp@mastodon.nu
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer Example: https://tldr.nettime.org/@rasmusfleischer/116255229245842899

                      ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tkissing@mastodon.socialT tkissing@mastodon.social

                        @theleftistlawyer "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Frank Wilhoit

                        xeno@hexokina.seX This user is from outside of this forum
                        xeno@hexokina.seX This user is from outside of this forum
                        xeno@hexokina.se
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        @theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social @tkissing@mastodon.social 10/10 quote reference but just a note that that quote is actually from a random internet person who happened to share a last name with that guy

                        still a great quote

                        tkissing@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • xeno@hexokina.seX xeno@hexokina.se

                          @theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social @tkissing@mastodon.social 10/10 quote reference but just a note that that quote is actually from a random internet person who happened to share a last name with that guy

                          still a great quote

                          tkissing@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tkissing@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tkissing@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          @xeno @theleftistlawyer The "random Internet person" is Francis 'Frank' Wilhoit, a composer usually going by Frank Wilhoit. "That guy" was Francis Marion 'Frank' Wilhoit, a political scientist going by Francis M. Wilhoit. So based on the names these people used in their publish work, I did attribute correctly 🙂

                          xeno@hexokina.seX 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

                            @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer Example: https://tldr.nettime.org/@rasmusfleischer/116255229245842899

                            ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            ninestonesclose@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            @ahltorp @theleftistlawyer yes, it’s an example of a case by a political philosopher who is well known for being provocative and confrontational. Nothing to do with my original comment though. When there is evidence, people can use any label they like, It also doesn’t make it fact. https://www.britannica.com/topic/antisemitism/Nazi-antisemitism-and-the-Holocaust

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tkissing@mastodon.socialT tkissing@mastodon.social

                              @xeno @theleftistlawyer The "random Internet person" is Francis 'Frank' Wilhoit, a composer usually going by Frank Wilhoit. "That guy" was Francis Marion 'Frank' Wilhoit, a political scientist going by Francis M. Wilhoit. So based on the names these people used in their publish work, I did attribute correctly 🙂

                              xeno@hexokina.seX This user is from outside of this forum
                              xeno@hexokina.seX This user is from outside of this forum
                              xeno@hexokina.se
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              @theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social @tkissing@mastodon.social oh my bad lol

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • rapsneezy@mastodon.socialR rapsneezy@mastodon.social

                                @theleftistlawyer

                                Isn't the USA blockading Cuba?

                                Venezuela?

                                ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                                ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                                ohir@social.vivaldi.net
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                @rapsneezy @theleftistlawyer
                                > blockading Cuba?
                                Partially. Russian vessels vetted by Anatoly Kolodkin can pass freely. Last one docked at Matanzas pier past Tuesday, iirc.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups