Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. You're probably hearing a lot from Marco Rubio and the US State Department about international law and the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran cannot legally close the Strait.

You're probably hearing a lot from Marco Rubio and the US State Department about international law and the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran cannot legally close the Strait.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
25 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • theleftistlawyer@mastodon.socialT theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social

    You're probably hearing a lot from Marco Rubio and the US State Department about international law and the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran cannot legally close the Strait. Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, that's true!

    There's just one problem.

    The US never ratified that treaty.

    infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    infoseepage@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @theleftistlawyer And neither did Iran or Israel. Israel never even signed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • theleftistlawyer@mastodon.socialT theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social

      You're probably hearing a lot from Marco Rubio and the US State Department about international law and the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran cannot legally close the Strait. Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, that's true!

      There's just one problem.

      The US never ratified that treaty.

      infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      infoseepage@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      @theleftistlawyer For those that are interested. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parties_to_the_United_Nations_Convention_on_the_Law_of_the_Sea

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benhm3@saint-paul.usB benhm3@saint-paul.us

        @theleftistlawyer

        Right, legally, one can’t close the airspace over one’s house by firing a machine gun into the air.

        There’s the itty bitty matter of getting one to stop once they start.

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        mike805@noc.social
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @BenHM3 @theleftistlawyer The Strait is narrow enough to be Iranian territorial waters, as well as Oman on the other side. As I understand it Oman signed a treaty that Iran did not sign.

        The whole concept of territorial waters, the traditional six-mile limit, came from how far one could shoot a cannon from a shore fort.

        International law tends to conform to physical reality since there is no 911 to call when your neighbor pisses on your lawn.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN ninestonesclose@mastodon.social

          @theleftistlawyer the government of the USA of A making up shit as they go along, shoot from the hip, yee haw … dumbasses … doesn’t Israel tell the USA what to do now anyway?

          ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
          ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
          ahltorp@mastodon.nu
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer If you mean ”Israel controls the US”, that’s a classic antisemitic propaganda trope. If you mean ”Trump does what the last person he spoke to said”, that’s probably true.

          ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

            @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer If you mean ”Israel controls the US”, that’s a classic antisemitic propaganda trope. If you mean ”Trump does what the last person he spoke to said”, that’s probably true.

            ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            ninestonesclose@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @ahltorp @theleftistlawyer antisemitism is often used as an excuse by the uneducated and the politicians to shout down anything said these days against the current genocidal expansionist Israeli state. You maybe need to read some books about what antisemitism actually means.

            ahltorp@mastodon.nuA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN ninestonesclose@mastodon.social

              @ahltorp @theleftistlawyer antisemitism is often used as an excuse by the uneducated and the politicians to shout down anything said these days against the current genocidal expansionist Israeli state. You maybe need to read some books about what antisemitism actually means.

              ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
              ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
              ahltorp@mastodon.nu
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer What I wrote was that it’s a ”classic antisemitic propaganda trope”. It’s dangerously close to what some people are saying that’s actually antisemitic, so please tread carefully.

              ahltorp@mastodon.nuA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

                @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer What I wrote was that it’s a ”classic antisemitic propaganda trope”. It’s dangerously close to what some people are saying that’s actually antisemitic, so please tread carefully.

                ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                ahltorp@mastodon.nu
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer Example: https://tldr.nettime.org/@rasmusfleischer/116255229245842899

                ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tkissing@mastodon.socialT tkissing@mastodon.social

                  @theleftistlawyer "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Frank Wilhoit

                  xeno@hexokina.seX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xeno@hexokina.seX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xeno@hexokina.se
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  @theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social @tkissing@mastodon.social 10/10 quote reference but just a note that that quote is actually from a random internet person who happened to share a last name with that guy

                  still a great quote

                  tkissing@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • xeno@hexokina.seX xeno@hexokina.se

                    @theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social @tkissing@mastodon.social 10/10 quote reference but just a note that that quote is actually from a random internet person who happened to share a last name with that guy

                    still a great quote

                    tkissing@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tkissing@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tkissing@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @xeno @theleftistlawyer The "random Internet person" is Francis 'Frank' Wilhoit, a composer usually going by Frank Wilhoit. "That guy" was Francis Marion 'Frank' Wilhoit, a political scientist going by Francis M. Wilhoit. So based on the names these people used in their publish work, I did attribute correctly 🙂

                    xeno@hexokina.seX 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

                      @NineStonesClose @theleftistlawyer Example: https://tldr.nettime.org/@rasmusfleischer/116255229245842899

                      ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      ninestonesclose@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      ninestonesclose@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @ahltorp @theleftistlawyer yes, it’s an example of a case by a political philosopher who is well known for being provocative and confrontational. Nothing to do with my original comment though. When there is evidence, people can use any label they like, It also doesn’t make it fact. https://www.britannica.com/topic/antisemitism/Nazi-antisemitism-and-the-Holocaust

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tkissing@mastodon.socialT tkissing@mastodon.social

                        @xeno @theleftistlawyer The "random Internet person" is Francis 'Frank' Wilhoit, a composer usually going by Frank Wilhoit. "That guy" was Francis Marion 'Frank' Wilhoit, a political scientist going by Francis M. Wilhoit. So based on the names these people used in their publish work, I did attribute correctly 🙂

                        xeno@hexokina.seX This user is from outside of this forum
                        xeno@hexokina.seX This user is from outside of this forum
                        xeno@hexokina.se
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @theleftistlawyer@mastodon.social @tkissing@mastodon.social oh my bad lol

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • rapsneezy@mastodon.socialR rapsneezy@mastodon.social

                          @theleftistlawyer

                          Isn't the USA blockading Cuba?

                          Venezuela?

                          ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                          ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                          ohir@social.vivaldi.net
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @rapsneezy @theleftistlawyer
                          > blockading Cuba?
                          Partially. Russian vessels vetted by Anatoly Kolodkin can pass freely. Last one docked at Matanzas pier past Tuesday, iirc.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups