In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
-
In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
Per the due diligence investigation service Bubblemaps, the wallets used were first used 24 hours earlier.
Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic.
@mattsheffield perverse incentives
-
In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
Per the due diligence investigation service Bubblemaps, the wallets used were first used 24 hours earlier.
Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic.
-
In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
Per the due diligence investigation service Bubblemaps, the wallets used were first used 24 hours earlier.
Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic.
@mattsheffield polymarket is dissallowed here in the UK. For good reasons!
-
@mattsheffield @mattsheffield wow, and yikes. One would think there would be laws, but alas we forgot to care meaningfully about the rule of law or common sense recently
...Though that doesn't stop LLMs from being terrible for humanity too
@quinn @mattsheffield there are indeed laws. At least in the UK.
-
@mattsheffield I guess some Pentagon employees made a killing with this.
- Pretty shure said #shitcoins get quickly exchanged for #Monero and then disappear...
@kkarhan @mattsheffield pun intended?
-
@quinn @mattsheffield there are indeed laws. At least in the UK.
@DoctorDNS @mattsheffield pretty sure you guys don't have any laws governing polymatket.
-
In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
Per the due diligence investigation service Bubblemaps, the wallets used were first used 24 hours earlier.
Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic.
@mattsheffield
"Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic."You know it's possible for both to be, simultaneously, right?
-
In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
Per the due diligence investigation service Bubblemaps, the wallets used were first used 24 hours earlier.
Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic.
@mattsheffield Not if the ones in charge of the nation are doing it
-
@mattsheffield @mattsheffield wow, and yikes. One would think there would be laws, but alas we forgot to care meaningfully about the rule of law or common sense recently
...Though that doesn't stop LLMs from being terrible for humanity too
What happens when the lawkeepers are dedicated loyalists? Well, this...
-
In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
Per the due diligence investigation service Bubblemaps, the wallets used were first used 24 hours earlier.
Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic.
@mattsheffield it is an evolution of the pizza shop
-
In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
Per the due diligence investigation service Bubblemaps, the wallets used were first used 24 hours earlier.
Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic.
@mattsheffield yeah surprising with all the hardware the US were sending to the Middle East over the last few weeks. /s Also both prediction markets and AI can be a security issue.
-
In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
Per the due diligence investigation service Bubblemaps, the wallets used were first used 24 hours earlier.
Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic.
@mattsheffield por_que_no_los_dos.gif
-
In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
Per the due diligence investigation service Bubblemaps, the wallets used were first used 24 hours earlier.
Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic.
@mattsheffield Anybody look into what's been happening on the oil futures markets?
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
@mattsheffield F-22s were spotted in Israel on like Thursday. Was a pretty safe guess.
@pl @mattsheffield
it could have been March 1st -
@pl @mattsheffield
it could have been March 1st@elCelio @mattsheffield I don't use whatever that platform is but it'd be interesting to see if it had any other "attack by" bets, although that'd ruin the whole conspiracy thing
-
In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
Per the due diligence investigation service Bubblemaps, the wallets used were first used 24 hours earlier.
Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic.
-
In case you were wondering, before this morning's Iran attack, Polymarket had yet another spate of likely inside traders betting that the US would strike Iran by February 28.
Per the due diligence investigation service Bubblemaps, the wallets used were first used 24 hours earlier.
Betting prediction websites are national security risks, not Anthropic.
@mattsheffield: Anthropic is an international security threat regardless; neither Anthropic nor Polymarket should legally exist.
