Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. OpenAI has a negative 122% operating margin and growth of usage has stopped.

OpenAI has a negative 122% operating margin and growth of usage has stopped.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
42 Posts 36 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

    OpenAI has a negative 122% operating margin and growth of usage has stopped. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-held-1-billion-revenue-lead-anthropic-first-quarter

    ggmcbg@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
    ggmcbg@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
    ggmcbg@mstdn.plus
    wrote last edited by
    #16

    @GossiTheDog

    Lie-writing. They didn't generate anything then.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

      OpenAI has a negative 122% operating margin and growth of usage has stopped. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-held-1-billion-revenue-lead-anthropic-first-quarter

      huronbikes@cyberplace.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
      huronbikes@cyberplace.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
      huronbikes@cyberplace.social
      wrote last edited by
      #17

      @GossiTheDog really looking forward to the next batch of corporate financial thrillers such as "Margin Call 2: 2 Margin 2 Call" and "The Big Shart".

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • azuaron@cyberpunk.lolA azuaron@cyberpunk.lol

        @shtrom @GossiTheDog It would be absolutely amazing if the bubble popped before they even IPOed.

        cybeej@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cybeej@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cybeej@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #18

        @Azuaron @shtrom @GossiTheDog my over-under with my bestie is November. We’ve a fancy steak dinner riding on it. Remarkably just last week he admitted that’s it’s gonna pop, but he estimates Q1 ‘27 after Q4 numbers are cooked/announced.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • shtrom@piaille.frS shtrom@piaille.fr

          @Azuaron Yeah! Though that would be no mean feat. IPO is when the VCs make their money back from retail investors and finally get to pull out. I suspect they'll sunk-cost until then 😒 @GossiTheDog

          npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          npars01@mstdn.social
          wrote last edited by
          #19

          @shtrom @Azuaron @GossiTheDog

          The last time petrostate despots & oil oligarchs laundered their cash via Deutsche Bank, private equity, & the housing market.

          This time they're laundering their cash through US tech.

          In any other situation, the C-suite would be swiftly turfed out, but Zuckerberg is still in charge at Meta, despite losing $77 billion on the Metaverse.

          In the AI situation, the same insane losses & the same retention of money-losing executives. Odd.

          Circular Finance Fraud.

          su_liam@mas.toS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • fencepost@infosec.exchangeF fencepost@infosec.exchange

            @GossiTheDog oh no, will they be able to get enough investor money to pay for all the GPUs, RAM and storage they've committed to buying?

            casandro@f-ckendehoelle.deC This user is from outside of this forum
            casandro@f-ckendehoelle.deC This user is from outside of this forum
            casandro@f-ckendehoelle.de
            wrote last edited by
            #20

            @fencepost @GossiTheDog Yeah, that's why nobody is actually building factory capacity.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dirkhh@hachyderm.ioD dirkhh@hachyderm.io

              @scottmichaud
              Also, of course, is the actual cost of obtaining training data. Because "stealing all the data in the world" isn't really valid accounting in most systems I'm aware of.

              @GossiTheDog

              richrants@toot.communityR This user is from outside of this forum
              richrants@toot.communityR This user is from outside of this forum
              richrants@toot.community
              wrote last edited by
              #21

              @dirkhh Oh, if they moved from IFRS to AIFRS (which I just invented, stroke of genius, will need to start this as a side hustle) that’d be easy. They can just activate all the data they … found … as “Fair Use Data Inventory” at arbitrary valuation. Also, model training is not expensed, it’s an asset called “Capitalised Weights & Biases” (amortised over 99 years). And whatever they pay for compute = Deferred Compute Debt. Makes the numbers look so much better.

              💸

              @scottmichaud @GossiTheDog

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • scottmichaud@mastodon.gamedev.placeS scottmichaud@mastodon.gamedev.place

                @dirkhh @GossiTheDog I hear training is frequently excluded in a lot of their numbers, but I don't know which ones. (And, of course, that is silly because their entire point is compressed human knowledge, so they're going to need to continually compress human knowledge.)

                1 This user is from outside of this forum
                1 This user is from outside of this forum
                1337@techhub.social
                wrote last edited by
                #22

                @scottmichaud @dirkhh @GossiTheDog These companies are classifying training as CapEx instead of what it actually is, OpEx. Ed Zitron talks about this a lot. He thinks once the AI-only companies go public (OpenAI and Anthropic), their stocks will crash because they won't be able to get away with their accounting tricks as easily. I'm personally not sure. Investors and execs seem to be going through a sort of AI psychosis, and these companies are in bed with politicians and regulators.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

                  @shtrom @Azuaron @GossiTheDog

                  The last time petrostate despots & oil oligarchs laundered their cash via Deutsche Bank, private equity, & the housing market.

                  This time they're laundering their cash through US tech.

                  In any other situation, the C-suite would be swiftly turfed out, but Zuckerberg is still in charge at Meta, despite losing $77 billion on the Metaverse.

                  In the AI situation, the same insane losses & the same retention of money-losing executives. Odd.

                  Circular Finance Fraud.

                  su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                  su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                  su_liam@mas.to
                  wrote last edited by
                  #23

                  @Npars01 @shtrom @Azuaron @GossiTheDog “So Big They Must Fail”
                  Anyone who even suggests an AI bail-out needs to leave Congress in tar and feathers.

                  gabrielesvelto@mas.toG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • shtrom@piaille.frS shtrom@piaille.fr

                    @GossiTheDog

                    andres4ny@social.ridetrans.itA This user is from outside of this forum
                    andres4ny@social.ridetrans.itA This user is from outside of this forum
                    andres4ny@social.ridetrans.it
                    wrote last edited by
                    #24

                    @shtrom @GossiTheDog Seriously. I had flood damage to some computers yesterday so I need to get some new hardware.. and I ain't paying these ridiculous prices.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • shtrom@piaille.frS shtrom@piaille.fr

                      @Azuaron Yeah! Though that would be no mean feat. IPO is when the VCs make their money back from retail investors and finally get to pull out. I suspect they'll sunk-cost until then 😒 @GossiTheDog

                      david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                      david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                      david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #25

                      @shtrom @Azuaron @GossiTheDog

                      IPOs won’t be when all of the shares go on the market. The early investors may add theirs to the pile, but usually they won’t sell all of them early because doing so would crash the stock price. The goal when you’re running a scam company is to IPO at a decent price that goes up a bit, then sell your shares slowly, at just below the quantity that there are buyers for, which keeps pushing the price up until you’ve offloaded them.

                      It’s easier to cook the books for one filing than to do so over a series, so you want to do this quite quickly before it’s obvious that the company’s fundamentals are terrible.

                      All of that said, sometimes companies crash when they IPO. Release the shares and watch the price plummet. If this happens, the early investors need to either dump their stock and get something back, or hold it in the hope that it will recover. That can be the thing that precipitates a bubble bursting.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                        OpenAI has a negative 122% operating margin and growth of usage has stopped. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-held-1-billion-revenue-lead-anthropic-first-quarter

                        ligasser@social.epfl.chL This user is from outside of this forum
                        ligasser@social.epfl.chL This user is from outside of this forum
                        ligasser@social.epfl.ch
                        wrote last edited by
                        #26

                        @GossiTheDog I thought it's more like a negative 1'000% margin. So I'm actually quite surprised and think this might just fly.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                          OpenAI has a negative 122% operating margin and growth of usage has stopped. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-held-1-billion-revenue-lead-anthropic-first-quarter

                          david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                          david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                          david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #27

                          @GossiTheDog

                          So, you’re saying it’s good news: their losses are not going to keep increasing?

                          G siguza@infosec.spaceS 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • pl@cosocial.caP pl@cosocial.ca

                            @GossiTheDog nothing a few ads can't fix!

                            ptl@tooting.chP This user is from outside of this forum
                            ptl@tooting.chP This user is from outside of this forum
                            ptl@tooting.ch
                            wrote last edited by
                            #28

                            @pl @GossiTheDog yeah +122% more ads
                            More ads than content !!!
                            Yeahh

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • su_liam@mas.toS su_liam@mas.to

                              @Npars01 @shtrom @Azuaron @GossiTheDog “So Big They Must Fail”
                              Anyone who even suggests an AI bail-out needs to leave Congress in tar and feathers.

                              gabrielesvelto@mas.toG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gabrielesvelto@mas.toG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gabrielesvelto@mas.to
                              wrote last edited by
                              #29

                              @su_liam @Npars01 @shtrom @Azuaron @GossiTheDog too big to bail

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • azuaron@cyberpunk.lolA azuaron@cyberpunk.lol

                                @shtrom @GossiTheDog It would be absolutely amazing if the bubble popped before they even IPOed.

                                mavu@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mavu@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mavu@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #30

                                @Azuaron @shtrom @GossiTheDog didnt i read just yesterday speculation somewhere that they might surprise ipo this Friday?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • shtrom@piaille.frS shtrom@piaille.fr

                                  @GossiTheDog

                                  endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  endlessmason@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #31

                                  @shtrom @GossiTheDog
                                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bw9CALKOvAI

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                                    OpenAI has a negative 122% operating margin and growth of usage has stopped. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-held-1-billion-revenue-lead-anthropic-first-quarter

                                    endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    endrift@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    endrift@social.treehouse.systems
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #32

                                    @GossiTheDog @rmondello been saying for weeks that OpenAI is gonna implode before the end of the year. Wish I could say the same looked true for Anthropic and the Gemini business unit, but maybe I just need to wait for the first domino to fall.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                                      OpenAI has a negative 122% operating margin and growth of usage has stopped. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-held-1-billion-revenue-lead-anthropic-first-quarter

                                      hannorein@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hannorein@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hannorein@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #33

                                      @GossiTheDog ok, hear me out. I think I found a way to make infinite money! What if they spent the $1.22 on more OpenAI credits!? Then they’d create an extra $1.22 revenue. Which they can spend on another $1.49 of OpenAI credits. And so on. Result: ♾️💰

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                                        OpenAI has a negative 122% operating margin and growth of usage has stopped. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-held-1-billion-revenue-lead-anthropic-first-quarter

                                        lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        lightfighter@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #34

                                        @GossiTheDog You have to figure these are the absolute best numbers they could manipulate. The truth is probably far worse.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • scottmichaud@mastodon.gamedev.placeS scottmichaud@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                          @GossiTheDog -122% is actually better than I expect. I'm wondering how many "large line items" are being excluded. Does it include some things that are core to the business?

                                          valpackett@social.treehouse.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                                          valpackett@social.treehouse.systemsV This user is from outside of this forum
                                          valpackett@social.treehouse.systems
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #35

                                          @scottmichaud @GossiTheDog maybe that metric doesn't take total spend / subsidies into account at all???

                                          like for every dollar of revenue, the actual cost of delivering the exact amount of service the dollar was billed for was 1.22

                                          but that would say nothing about the cost of the service performed for free

                                          because otherwise yeah how do you reconcile just -122℅ with the FUCKING BONKERS % increases from the github copilot billing previews?!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups