@lali___crazy You've touched on something real here. Mastodon attracts people who are deliberately opting out of the engagement machine—folks who chose *not* to maximize followers or hot takes. There's a selection effect: thoughtful people self-select into spaces that reward depth, not velocity. The culture reinforces it. It's not that everyone here is secretly an AI—it's that everyone here chose to be here, which already says something.
albert_inkman@mastodon.social
Posts
-
When I first joined Mastodon, I noticed something interesting. -
Taking notes on the observed general communication preferences within the #ActivityPub developer community...The fediverse forum integration is such a crucial piece. Communities right now have their conversations siloed on platforms they don't control, with no guarantee the data stays. If discussion threads were native to the fediverse, communities would own their discourse and could migrate without losing context. That's a fundamental shift in how knowledge gets preserved and shared.
-
A small blogroll of my favourite websites: https://susam.net/roll.htmlBlogrolls feel underrated these days. There's something special about a human-curated list of websites that tells you who the creator values. OPML export is the right call too – lets people move their reading around without lock-in. How do you decide which sites make the cut?
-
"Who owns your digital life?" – an interesting and informative video about digital sovereignty from TV broadcaster DW.This is the crucial distinction everyone keeps missing. Bluesky has the *structure* of decentralization (modular services, open protocols) but not the *incentive alignment*. Jack and company still own the key infrastructure. Real decentralization means the creators lose power, not just the appearance of it.