Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Keeping kids safe online is a top priority.

Keeping kids safe online is a top priority.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
36 Posts 21 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.euH hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu

    Keeping kids safe online is a top priority.

    Today, the Commission has preliminarily found porn platforms Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos in breach of the Digital Services Act for allowing minors to access adult content.

    We’ve also launched investigation into Snapchat under doubts that the platform has failed to adequately protect minors from harmful content, grooming, and illegal products like drugs and vapes. We also suspect that they have failed to verify users age sufficiently.

    ivolimmen@toot.communityI This user is from outside of this forum
    ivolimmen@toot.communityI This user is from outside of this forum
    ivolimmen@toot.community
    wrote last edited by
    #13

    @HennaVirkkunen personally I don't think age verification is something that works. It's like putting speedbumps on the highway because a few are driving too fast. Parents should educate their kids on how to use the internet. I would love to see more investigations on products our kids use that see show our kids stuff they should not see

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • bjoreman@toot.cafeB bjoreman@toot.cafe

      @HennaVirkkunen How is that to be done without handing these platforms our identities and ability to track us? Seems the last thing I want is for them to be trusted with anything.

      david@maximalismo.redD This user is from outside of this forum
      david@maximalismo.redD This user is from outside of this forum
      david@maximalismo.red
      wrote last edited by
      #14
      There is a simple way: the EU establishes a «neutral point of identity» similar to the passage of Spanish administration https://pasarela.clave.gob.es/. Just the regulation enabling it have to make sure it doesn't store data on which sites you visit.

      This service only has to respond to the provider's request affirmatively or negatively given legal conditions to access its site.

      CC: @HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu
      Link Preview Image
      Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital

      favicon

      (pasarela.clave.gob.es)

      bjoreman@toot.cafeB danieldk@mastodon.socialD 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.euH hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu

        Keeping kids safe online is a top priority.

        Today, the Commission has preliminarily found porn platforms Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos in breach of the Digital Services Act for allowing minors to access adult content.

        We’ve also launched investigation into Snapchat under doubts that the platform has failed to adequately protect minors from harmful content, grooming, and illegal products like drugs and vapes. We also suspect that they have failed to verify users age sufficiently.

        uriel@x.keinpfusch.netU This user is from outside of this forum
        uriel@x.keinpfusch.netU This user is from outside of this forum
        uriel@x.keinpfusch.net
        wrote last edited by
        #15

        @HennaVirkkunen

        Just 2 cents: the EU should provide census API, so that it would be possible to verify age of people. Census is a govt job. There is no digital identity on internet.

        This is a fault of governments. Once you create a digital ID to check with, then you have the right to complain about "you don't check their age".

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.euH hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu

          Keeping kids safe online is a top priority.

          Today, the Commission has preliminarily found porn platforms Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos in breach of the Digital Services Act for allowing minors to access adult content.

          We’ve also launched investigation into Snapchat under doubts that the platform has failed to adequately protect minors from harmful content, grooming, and illegal products like drugs and vapes. We also suspect that they have failed to verify users age sufficiently.

          chapz@mastodon.onlineC This user is from outside of this forum
          chapz@mastodon.onlineC This user is from outside of this forum
          chapz@mastodon.online
          wrote last edited by
          #16

          @HennaVirkkunen And what priority has the protection of personal data of adults?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • david@maximalismo.redD david@maximalismo.red
            There is a simple way: the EU establishes a «neutral point of identity» similar to the passage of Spanish administration https://pasarela.clave.gob.es/. Just the regulation enabling it have to make sure it doesn't store data on which sites you visit.

            This service only has to respond to the provider's request affirmatively or negatively given legal conditions to access its site.

            CC: @HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu
            Link Preview Image
            Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital

            favicon

            (pasarela.clave.gob.es)

            bjoreman@toot.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
            bjoreman@toot.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
            bjoreman@toot.cafe
            wrote last edited by
            #17

            @david @HennaVirkkunen That sounds reasonable-ish. I hope they don't build regulations which create a sea of very poor malicious compliance.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.euH hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu

              Keeping kids safe online is a top priority.

              Today, the Commission has preliminarily found porn platforms Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos in breach of the Digital Services Act for allowing minors to access adult content.

              We’ve also launched investigation into Snapchat under doubts that the platform has failed to adequately protect minors from harmful content, grooming, and illegal products like drugs and vapes. We also suspect that they have failed to verify users age sufficiently.

              dylvn@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dylvn@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dylvn@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #18

              @HennaVirkkunen You don't keep our kids safe by doing this, It's the opposite. That's sad for EU

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • david@maximalismo.redD david@maximalismo.red
                There is a simple way: the EU establishes a «neutral point of identity» similar to the passage of Spanish administration https://pasarela.clave.gob.es/. Just the regulation enabling it have to make sure it doesn't store data on which sites you visit.

                This service only has to respond to the provider's request affirmatively or negatively given legal conditions to access its site.

                CC: @HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu
                Link Preview Image
                Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital

                favicon

                (pasarela.clave.gob.es)

                danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                danieldk@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #19

                @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen that site somehow doesn't seem to work here. But in general, these proposals fail, because sites can regularly probe for age brackets. If you do this on a regular basis, you can figure out someone's birthday.

                E.g. if 12 years is a bracket boundary, the day that age gets attested is the birthday of the kid. Even more likely because someone is more likely to check close after their birthday to unlock some site/functionality.

                david@maximalismo.redD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.euH hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu

                  Keeping kids safe online is a top priority.

                  Today, the Commission has preliminarily found porn platforms Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos in breach of the Digital Services Act for allowing minors to access adult content.

                  We’ve also launched investigation into Snapchat under doubts that the platform has failed to adequately protect minors from harmful content, grooming, and illegal products like drugs and vapes. We also suspect that they have failed to verify users age sufficiently.

                  jonas@social.violoncello.chJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jonas@social.violoncello.chJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jonas@social.violoncello.ch
                  wrote last edited by
                  #20

                  Dear @EUCommission and @HennaVirkkunen
                  Please consider what the world wide community of scientists for computer security and privacy, who are studying the impacts of technology on society, have to say on this topic. They published an open letter, signed by more than 400 scientists in the field, calling for a (temporary) moratorium on age verification online earlier this month:
                  https://csa-scientist-open-letter.org/ageverif-Feb2026

                  #technology #ageverification #society #science

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.euH hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu

                    Keeping kids safe online is a top priority.

                    Today, the Commission has preliminarily found porn platforms Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos in breach of the Digital Services Act for allowing minors to access adult content.

                    We’ve also launched investigation into Snapchat under doubts that the platform has failed to adequately protect minors from harmful content, grooming, and illegal products like drugs and vapes. We also suspect that they have failed to verify users age sufficiently.

                    muzicofiel@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
                    muzicofiel@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
                    muzicofiel@mastodon.nl
                    wrote last edited by
                    #21

                    @HennaVirkkunen First a #privacy first age verification tool. Otherwise each platform makes his own system and collecting enorm much data.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • danieldk@mastodon.socialD danieldk@mastodon.social

                      @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen that site somehow doesn't seem to work here. But in general, these proposals fail, because sites can regularly probe for age brackets. If you do this on a regular basis, you can figure out someone's birthday.

                      E.g. if 12 years is a bracket boundary, the day that age gets attested is the birthday of the kid. Even more likely because someone is more likely to check close after their birthday to unlock some site/functionality.

                      david@maximalismo.redD This user is from outside of this forum
                      david@maximalismo.redD This user is from outside of this forum
                      david@maximalismo.red
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22
                      Excuse me Daniël, but I don't understand the problem. Wasn't the goal to prevent people under the legal age from accessing the service? Once that was achieved, what's the failure?

                      CC: @bjoreman@toot.cafe @HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu
                      danieldk@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • david@maximalismo.redD david@maximalismo.red
                        Excuse me Daniël, but I don't understand the problem. Wasn't the goal to prevent people under the legal age from accessing the service? Once that was achieved, what's the failure?

                        CC: @bjoreman@toot.cafe @HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu
                        danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        danieldk@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #23

                        @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen The problem with most age attestations is that you can work out someone's birthday by keeping track of past attestations. When the attestation changes, someone had their birthday, thus the attestation gives away information that someone might not want to reveal.

                        This gets worse with implementations with which you can test age brackets (different age brackets under 18, to allow some content).

                        danieldk@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • danieldk@mastodon.socialD danieldk@mastodon.social

                          @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen The problem with most age attestations is that you can work out someone's birthday by keeping track of past attestations. When the attestation changes, someone had their birthday, thus the attestation gives away information that someone might not want to reveal.

                          This gets worse with implementations with which you can test age brackets (different age brackets under 18, to allow some content).

                          danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                          danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                          danieldk@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #24

                          @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen So, the problem with age verification is that it is yet another attack on privacy. Not surprisingly, behind the scenes Meta is pushing this a lot through various sock puppets.

                          danieldk@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • danieldk@mastodon.socialD danieldk@mastodon.social

                            @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen So, the problem with age verification is that it is yet another attack on privacy. Not surprisingly, behind the scenes Meta is pushing this a lot through various sock puppets.

                            danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                            danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                            danieldk@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #25

                            @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen Also, age verification is strongly detrimental to open source and your freedom to choose your OS.

                            Most implementations of 'anonymous' age verification require remote hardware attestation (eventually), because otherwise you can manipulate the app/process that partakes in the attestation.

                            Mandatory remote attestation is pretty much the end of free OS choice, because you running your own non-approved software will shut you out of services.

                            danieldk@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • danieldk@mastodon.socialD danieldk@mastodon.social

                              @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen Also, age verification is strongly detrimental to open source and your freedom to choose your OS.

                              Most implementations of 'anonymous' age verification require remote hardware attestation (eventually), because otherwise you can manipulate the app/process that partakes in the attestation.

                              Mandatory remote attestation is pretty much the end of free OS choice, because you running your own non-approved software will shut you out of services.

                              danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              danieldk@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #26

                              @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen Age verification + remote attestation is big tech's pipe dream. Google can already shut out competing systems from phone NFC payments, because pretty much every bank only supports Google/Apple Pay and Google doesn't attest alt-OSes.

                              Remote attestation of websites would be another level, making it practically impossible to live outside the Google/Apple duopoly.

                              danieldk@mastodon.socialD 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • danieldk@mastodon.socialD danieldk@mastodon.social

                                @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen Age verification + remote attestation is big tech's pipe dream. Google can already shut out competing systems from phone NFC payments, because pretty much every bank only supports Google/Apple Pay and Google doesn't attest alt-OSes.

                                Remote attestation of websites would be another level, making it practically impossible to live outside the Google/Apple duopoly.

                                danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                danieldk@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #27

                                @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen For these reasons, Europeans should outright reject age verification.

                                Yes, I know it is difficult when kids can pretty much access anything, but as parents we have to find better ways than those that further kill privacy and entrench big tech players.

                                bjoreman@toot.cafeB david@maximalismo.redD 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • danieldk@mastodon.socialD danieldk@mastodon.social

                                  @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen Age verification + remote attestation is big tech's pipe dream. Google can already shut out competing systems from phone NFC payments, because pretty much every bank only supports Google/Apple Pay and Google doesn't attest alt-OSes.

                                  Remote attestation of websites would be another level, making it practically impossible to live outside the Google/Apple duopoly.

                                  danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  danieldk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  danieldk@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #28

                                  @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen also see https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-doc-technical-specification/issues/18

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • danieldk@mastodon.socialD danieldk@mastodon.social

                                    @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen For these reasons, Europeans should outright reject age verification.

                                    Yes, I know it is difficult when kids can pretty much access anything, but as parents we have to find better ways than those that further kill privacy and entrench big tech players.

                                    bjoreman@toot.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    bjoreman@toot.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    bjoreman@toot.cafe
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #29

                                    @danieldk @david @HennaVirkkunen Yeah, it’s not like there are no tools today for parents to control what kids can access.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.euH hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu

                                      We say this loud and clear: online platforms are responsible for protecting minors, and they need to do more to deliver on this responsibility.

                                      The full press releases:

                                      🔗 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_722
                                      🔗 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_723

                                      paul_harts@mastodon.nlP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      paul_harts@mastodon.nlP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      paul_harts@mastodon.nl
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #30

                                      @HennaVirkkunen and I have said it loud and clear too: protecting your children is the prime responsibility of parents and the tools to do so have become easier and easier to use and implement.

                                      Apart from that what is a minor?

                                      Apart from that, what’s the scientific evidence of seeing porn in the age bracket of say 12 to 18 is damaging? There is hardly any.

                                      Apart from that, read the comments of @danieldkok@mastodon.social
                                      Because he is right and knowledgeable.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • danieldk@mastodon.socialD danieldk@mastodon.social

                                        @david @bjoreman @HennaVirkkunen For these reasons, Europeans should outright reject age verification.

                                        Yes, I know it is difficult when kids can pretty much access anything, but as parents we have to find better ways than those that further kill privacy and entrench big tech players.

                                        david@maximalismo.redD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        david@maximalismo.redD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        david@maximalismo.red
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #31
                                        We're talking about very different systems. In Spain, for the past 82 years, all citizens have had an official identity document issued by the state. This document contains an electronic certificate that allows us to identify ourselves online to government agencies. With this type of infrastructure, a neutral state point is viable, one that simply certifies and responds with true or false to the legal requirements of any particular online service. The online service does not receive any other information than the complaining (or not) of the person on the other side of the connection with law requirements. No other data have to be shown or saved.

                                        I don't see the connection with free software because I'm not aware of any legal restrictions on using free software repositories by underage, and I cannot imagine it as a political possibility.

                                        CC: @bjoreman@toot.cafe @HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu
                                        danieldk@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.euH hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu

                                          Keeping kids safe online is a top priority.

                                          Today, the Commission has preliminarily found porn platforms Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos in breach of the Digital Services Act for allowing minors to access adult content.

                                          We’ve also launched investigation into Snapchat under doubts that the platform has failed to adequately protect minors from harmful content, grooming, and illegal products like drugs and vapes. We also suspect that they have failed to verify users age sufficiently.

                                          osma@mas.toO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          osma@mas.toO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          osma@mas.to
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #32

                                          Forcing consumers to reveal their identity to data abusers keeps no one safe, not children, not adults. Breaking and bypassing privacy technology actively makes the Internet less safe. Curtail data brokers and abusive targeted ad industry, regulate and monitor what GDPR already legislated.
                                          @HennaVirkkunen

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups