Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It's #WorldBicycleDay and a good time to mention this graph from Scientific American, first published in 1973, and updated 2025.

It's #WorldBicycleDay and a good time to mention this graph from Scientific American, first published in 1973, and updated 2025.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
worldbicycledaybiketooterclimate
43 Posts 22 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • two9a@hachyderm.ioT two9a@hachyderm.io

    @LovesTha @KingmaYpe At least the ebike missing makes sense, if the data's from 1973; the energy efficiency of the average train or bus you'd need to ask SciAm for, as to where it sits on this plot.

    I'd _guess_ they'd sit on the far lower right, at the bottom of that vehicular zone, which would still make "human on bike" lower on energy use.

    kingmaype@mastodon.greenK This user is from outside of this forum
    kingmaype@mastodon.greenK This user is from outside of this forum
    kingmaype@mastodon.green
    wrote last edited by
    #12

    @Two9A @LovesTha

    They updated in 2025, maybe at the next update they will be interested in maximum efficiency.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • lovestha@floss.socialL lovestha@floss.social

      @KingmaYpe @Two9A Trains and buses missing is also interesting choices.

      markhburton@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      markhburton@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      markhburton@mstdn.social
      wrote last edited by
      #13

      @LovesTha @KingmaYpe @Two9A
      No trains either!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • markhburton@mstdn.socialM markhburton@mstdn.social

        @KingmaYpe @Two9A
        How can that possibly be true?

        two9a@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
        two9a@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
        two9a@hachyderm.io
        wrote last edited by
        #14

        @markhburton @KingmaYpe Mm, it may feel like it's three times more efficient for the human pedalling, but that load's been transferred to the motor I guess.

        Definitely on a par for efficiency though.

        kingmaype@mastodon.greenK markhburton@mstdn.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • lovestha@floss.socialL lovestha@floss.social

          @Two9A @KingmaYpe the cloud of machine points implies they used such data, they just didn't choose to highlight the bus and train.

          lovestha@floss.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lovestha@floss.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lovestha@floss.social
          wrote last edited by
          #15

          @Two9A @KingmaYpe the first piece of data I can find converts to 0.3 calories per gram per km for freight trains. So probably as efficient as human in velomobile.

          Edit: sorry, reading chart badly. 0.3 is worse than the bikes. But still very good

          lovestha@floss.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • lovestha@floss.socialL lovestha@floss.social

            @Two9A @KingmaYpe the first piece of data I can find converts to 0.3 calories per gram per km for freight trains. So probably as efficient as human in velomobile.

            Edit: sorry, reading chart badly. 0.3 is worse than the bikes. But still very good

            lovestha@floss.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lovestha@floss.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lovestha@floss.social
            wrote last edited by
            #16

            @Two9A @KingmaYpe but I don't think I trust freight train as only twice as energy efficient as a jet.

            two9a@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • two9a@hachyderm.ioT two9a@hachyderm.io

              @markhburton @KingmaYpe Mm, it may feel like it's three times more efficient for the human pedalling, but that load's been transferred to the motor I guess.

              Definitely on a par for efficiency though.

              kingmaype@mastodon.greenK This user is from outside of this forum
              kingmaype@mastodon.greenK This user is from outside of this forum
              kingmaype@mastodon.green
              wrote last edited by
              #17

              @Two9A @markhburton

              Muscles are about as efficient as combustion engines.

              kingmaype@mastodon.greenK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • two9a@hachyderm.ioT two9a@hachyderm.io

                It's #WorldBicycleDay and a good time to mention this graph from Scientific American, first published in 1973, and updated 2025.

                A person on a bike is the world's most energy-efficient mode of transport, and it's not even close. Salmon use three times as many joules/g/km to get around, and then it's jet aircraft at 5x.

                #BikeTooter #Climate

                W This user is from outside of this forum
                W This user is from outside of this forum
                woo@fosstodon.org
                wrote last edited by
                #18

                @Two9A When you look at how close to zero it is, it's amazing how much people will spend for a tiny increase in efficiency.

                The first person I knew who bought an expensive bike realised that the lock he bought to protect it weighed more than the weight he'd saved by buying expensive tubing.

                W 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • two9a@hachyderm.ioT two9a@hachyderm.io

                  @markhburton @KingmaYpe Mm, it may feel like it's three times more efficient for the human pedalling, but that load's been transferred to the motor I guess.

                  Definitely on a par for efficiency though.

                  markhburton@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  markhburton@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  markhburton@mstdn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #19

                  @Two9A @KingmaYpe
                  You'd have to include at least the energy used in generation, transmission and battery losses, and conversion losses motion to electricity at source, and vice versa at the motor.
                  That's not taking account of the additional mining, processing, manufacture and distribution of the motor battery, and charger.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • lovestha@floss.socialL lovestha@floss.social

                    @Two9A @KingmaYpe but I don't think I trust freight train as only twice as energy efficient as a jet.

                    two9a@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                    two9a@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                    two9a@hachyderm.io
                    wrote last edited by
                    #20

                    @LovesTha @KingmaYpe I dunno, the widebodies with the gargantuan turbofans are astonishingly efficient. I found figures for the A330neo as operated by Cebu Pacific (with 459 seats crammed into economy) of 250 tons takeoff weight, 1.75L/100km of Jet-A used per seat; that translates to 0.6 cal/g/km if my sums work out.

                    maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizzaM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W woo@fosstodon.org

                      @Two9A When you look at how close to zero it is, it's amazing how much people will spend for a tiny increase in efficiency.

                      The first person I knew who bought an expensive bike realised that the lock he bought to protect it weighed more than the weight he'd saved by buying expensive tubing.

                      W This user is from outside of this forum
                      W This user is from outside of this forum
                      woo@fosstodon.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #21

                      @Two9A I just remembered that he also dragged that lock over the roof of a black car he hadn't seen, because dropped handlebars aren't a great idea in built-up areas, smashed his head and faced a crazy insurance claim.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • two9a@hachyderm.ioT two9a@hachyderm.io

                        It's #WorldBicycleDay and a good time to mention this graph from Scientific American, first published in 1973, and updated 2025.

                        A person on a bike is the world's most energy-efficient mode of transport, and it's not even close. Salmon use three times as many joules/g/km to get around, and then it's jet aircraft at 5x.

                        #BikeTooter #Climate

                        mr_harm@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mr_harm@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mr_harm@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #22

                        @Two9A interesting that a fighter jet is quite efficient in comparison to most walking animals...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                        • two9a@hachyderm.ioT two9a@hachyderm.io

                          It's #WorldBicycleDay and a good time to mention this graph from Scientific American, first published in 1973, and updated 2025.

                          A person on a bike is the world's most energy-efficient mode of transport, and it's not even close. Salmon use three times as many joules/g/km to get around, and then it's jet aircraft at 5x.

                          #BikeTooter #Climate

                          joncounts@mastodon.nzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          joncounts@mastodon.nzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          joncounts@mastodon.nz
                          wrote last edited by
                          #23

                          @Two9A There are velomobiles and then there’s Australian Aidan Lampe in a velomobile, who just set a world record by biking 1,512 km (!!!) in 24 hours, averaging over 63 km/hr.

                          Extraordinary.

                          ligfietsers (@ligfietsers@mastodon.nl)

                          Confirmed & Insane: The new 24-Hour Velomobile World Record is 1,512 km / 940 Miles #ligfietsers https://www.recumbent.news/2026/05/31/confirmed-insane-the-new-24-hour-velomobile-world-record-is-1512-km-940-miles/ #Velomobile #Races

                          favicon

                          Mastodon.nl door Stichting Activityclub (mastodon.nl)

                          armb@infosec.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • two9a@hachyderm.ioT two9a@hachyderm.io

                            It's #WorldBicycleDay and a good time to mention this graph from Scientific American, first published in 1973, and updated 2025.

                            A person on a bike is the world's most energy-efficient mode of transport, and it's not even close. Salmon use three times as many joules/g/km to get around, and then it's jet aircraft at 5x.

                            #BikeTooter #Climate

                            esorette@rivals.spaceE This user is from outside of this forum
                            esorette@rivals.spaceE This user is from outside of this forum
                            esorette@rivals.space
                            wrote last edited by
                            #24

                            @Two9A where are the trains ? am I missing something ?

                            two9a@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • esorette@rivals.spaceE esorette@rivals.space

                              @Two9A where are the trains ? am I missing something ?

                              two9a@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                              two9a@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                              two9a@hachyderm.io
                              wrote last edited by
                              #25

                              RE: https://floss.social/@LovesTha/116685207077107467

                              @esorette A figure found by @LovesTha puts freight trains in the lower right, about twice as energy-efficient as aeroplanes: https://hachyderm.io/@LovesTha@floss.social/116685207112065538

                              lovestha@floss.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • two9a@hachyderm.ioT two9a@hachyderm.io

                                RE: https://floss.social/@LovesTha/116685207077107467

                                @esorette A figure found by @LovesTha puts freight trains in the lower right, about twice as energy-efficient as aeroplanes: https://hachyderm.io/@LovesTha@floss.social/116685207112065538

                                lovestha@floss.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lovestha@floss.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lovestha@floss.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #26

                                @Two9A @esorette what i didn't say was that freight trains can be off the chart to the right 🙂

                                They be heavy.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • two9a@hachyderm.ioT two9a@hachyderm.io

                                  It's #WorldBicycleDay and a good time to mention this graph from Scientific American, first published in 1973, and updated 2025.

                                  A person on a bike is the world's most energy-efficient mode of transport, and it's not even close. Salmon use three times as many joules/g/km to get around, and then it's jet aircraft at 5x.

                                  #BikeTooter #Climate

                                  jochenlingelba1@h-net.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jochenlingelba1@h-net.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jochenlingelba1@h-net.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #27

                                  @Two9A And here is the original 1973 article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24923004

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • joncounts@mastodon.nzJ joncounts@mastodon.nz

                                    @Two9A There are velomobiles and then there’s Australian Aidan Lampe in a velomobile, who just set a world record by biking 1,512 km (!!!) in 24 hours, averaging over 63 km/hr.

                                    Extraordinary.

                                    ligfietsers (@ligfietsers@mastodon.nl)

                                    Confirmed & Insane: The new 24-Hour Velomobile World Record is 1,512 km / 940 Miles #ligfietsers https://www.recumbent.news/2026/05/31/confirmed-insane-the-new-24-hour-velomobile-world-record-is-1512-km-940-miles/ #Velomobile #Races

                                    favicon

                                    Mastodon.nl door Stichting Activityclub (mastodon.nl)

                                    armb@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    armb@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    armb@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #28

                                    @joncounts @Two9A I don't believe the "velomobile weighs less than bicycle" as shown on the chart though.

                                    two9a@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • armb@infosec.exchangeA armb@infosec.exchange

                                      @joncounts @Two9A I don't believe the "velomobile weighs less than bicycle" as shown on the chart though.

                                      two9a@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      two9a@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      two9a@hachyderm.io
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #29

                                      @armb @joncounts Mm, I mentioned elsewhere that I think the "human on velomobile" is one data point, and the person they found to measure energy output was just particularly small and light. It was always going to be in the ballpark of "human on bike" though.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • two9a@hachyderm.ioT two9a@hachyderm.io

                                        It's #WorldBicycleDay and a good time to mention this graph from Scientific American, first published in 1973, and updated 2025.

                                        A person on a bike is the world's most energy-efficient mode of transport, and it's not even close. Salmon use three times as many joules/g/km to get around, and then it's jet aircraft at 5x.

                                        #BikeTooter #Climate

                                        alper@rls.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        alper@rls.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        alper@rls.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #30

                                        @Two9A Can somebody update this and add an e-bike?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • kingmaype@mastodon.greenK kingmaype@mastodon.green

                                          @Two9A @markhburton

                                          Muscles are about as efficient as combustion engines.

                                          kingmaype@mastodon.greenK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          kingmaype@mastodon.greenK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          kingmaype@mastodon.green
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #31

                                          @Two9A @markhburton

                                          Fatbikes in NL take about 20 Wh/km:

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Hoeveel stroom verbruikt een elektrische fiets? | ANWB

                                          Hoeveel kWh een elektrische fiets verbruikt hangt af van meerdere factoren. Lees hier alles over het (besparen van) stroomverbruik met een elektrische fiets.

                                          favicon

                                          ANWB (www.anwb.nl)

                                          A Wh is about 0.86 calories.

                                          two9a@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups