You gave a stranger with no soul and no skin in the game the keys to everything you own.
-
@beyondmachines1
And maybe 40% of the time it's garbage, but plausible. Without the experts you fired, you don't know when it's wrong.So even if it was free, it would only really be a toy.
@raymaccarthy @beyondmachines1 s/it would only really be a toy/you would only really be a tool
Edit : I misread the original so here is what I intended originally for the sentence to look like.
-
@raymaccarthy @beyondmachines1 s/it would only really be a toy/you would only really be a tool
Edit : I misread the original so here is what I intended originally for the sentence to look like.
@Vive_Levant @beyondmachines1
I've used real, working computer tools professionally for decades and written them.
Also computer toys. I know the difference. -
@Vive_Levant @beyondmachines1
I've used real, working computer tools professionally for decades and written them.
Also computer toys. I know the difference.@raymaccarthy @beyondmachines1 you can check the two possibilities of the third meaning to get my point : https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tool
-
@raymaccarthy @beyondmachines1 you can check the two possibilities of the third meaning to get my point : https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tool
@raymaccarthy @beyondmachines1 oups, my bad, I overlooked your sentence and was certain to have read « YOU would only really be a toy. »
In this case my substitution worked, but you were right, with IT, it didn’t. Apologies. -
@beyondmachines1@infosec.exchange
this isnt going to matter to any c suite retards until ai bankrupts a large company (which seems unlikely) and they start a trend of posting on linkedin about the problem.@lastdinosaur Mature adults don't use that word that way. You should know better.
-
@beyondmachines1 To be fair, AI has its use, right? Maybe the business model just got to be better, maybe token count might need tweaking -- maybe put weight to something like output value, rather than input/output count.
To be sure, AI should not replace humans, rather augment us.@fightscore There are things it's proven very good at, mostly things it's already been doing for some years. Protein-folding, for example.
At the risk of discomforting some people, a good way to think about it is that AI tends to be good at things that autistic people are -- monotonous scanning, counting, etc. -- but has essentially perfect memory compared to humans, and far more powerful computational capacity. So it's good at things that require those tasks.
But not most other stuff.
-
@beyondmachines1 Why are so many of these anti-ai posts so obviously written by an LLM?
@kepeken What gives you that impression? Please don't tell me that you're one of those people who confuses competent literacy with fakery.
-
@chantaryu2 @beyondmachines1 Oups - sorry - I didn't intend the reply to be critical of you - I reworded it a bit.
@ElHadjiMurad @beyondmachines1 no worries
-
@beyondmachines1
Maybe my brain is just focused on body horror today, but I think I'm going to have this unintended phrase in the back of my mind every time LLMs come up.@PTR_K sorry about that.
-
@beyondmachines1 Satan is sitting, meanwhile, on his throne in hell cursing every demon in thrall to him because they didn't come up with this plan first.
@capnthommo not sure. Don't stop your enemy when they are making a mistake still stands.
-
@beyondmachines1 If only they had hired people to tell them this 2 years ago
@kookie maybe they did. I've been speaking this same thing for about a year at conferences full of HR and CEOs. No takers until they see the invoice.
-
@toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1 sounds like you never experienced an LLM finding the source of a production bug based on log files, code and given context, in less than 10min where you would have needed at least half a day
@fh0 profile pic checks out
-
@beyondmachines1 Is the tech useful in some places/needs. Yes of course. Is it the hype it's been sold as? Not even close. I don't think we'll achieve AGI until new forms of power production come along that can scale with this.
@beyondmachines1 As a follow up, a Meta DC is being built just miles from my house. Two power plants are part of the deal...a backup power plant.
-
@beyondmachines1 Why are so many of these anti-ai posts so obviously written by an LLM?
Drop in, stir some shit, ghost; I know that pattern as well and the response is; #WhackATroll good bye
-
@PTR_K sorry about that.
@beyondmachines1
No need for apology. It's an apt description. -
@toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1 sounds like you never experienced an LLM finding the source of a production bug based on log files, code and given context, in less than 10min where you would have needed at least half a day
@fh0@mastodon.social @toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1
Sounds like you never experienced two day per week watering because of a changing environment and having that available water flowing into a data center drive up your cost for those two days as well.
Regardless; defend this shit all you want but I don't feel inclined to read your comments. #KTB -
@kepeken What gives you that impression? Please don't tell me that you're one of those people who confuses competent literacy with fakery.
@wesdym It's because it's structured like this:
No X. No Y. Just Z.
And also
You didn't X. You YYYY.Then there's the fact that "the AI stops when it runs out of tokens" is not a fitting expression. It shows a sentence written with an understanding of the context and English, but not the mechanics behind the topic.
None of these prove that a human did not write it, so I said "why are so many" instead of "why is this" directly. (Since, if you have 10 80% chances you have a lot of examples.)
-
@wesdym It's because it's structured like this:
No X. No Y. Just Z.
And also
You didn't X. You YYYY.Then there's the fact that "the AI stops when it runs out of tokens" is not a fitting expression. It shows a sentence written with an understanding of the context and English, but not the mechanics behind the topic.
None of these prove that a human did not write it, so I said "why are so many" instead of "why is this" directly. (Since, if you have 10 80% chances you have a lot of examples.)
@kepeken Um, okay, sure, whatever.
It's a nice day to go for a walk. I suggest that.
-
@beyondmachines1@infosec.exchange
this isnt going to matter to any c suite retards until ai bankrupts a large company (which seems unlikely) and they start a trend of posting on linkedin about the problem. -
@wesdym It's because it's structured like this:
No X. No Y. Just Z.
And also
You didn't X. You YYYY.Then there's the fact that "the AI stops when it runs out of tokens" is not a fitting expression. It shows a sentence written with an understanding of the context and English, but not the mechanics behind the topic.
None of these prove that a human did not write it, so I said "why are so many" instead of "why is this" directly. (Since, if you have 10 80% chances you have a lot of examples.)
@kepeken For that matter, I'm taking 30 days away from you, in the hopes that touching grass does you some good.
