You gave a stranger with no soul and no skin in the game the keys to everything you own.

[elhadjimurad@beige.party]

@chantaryu2 @beyondmachines1 Oups - sorry - I didn't intend the reply to be critical of you - I reworded it a bit.

[a_lex_ander@mastodon.social]

@beyondmachines1 CEOs want to operate in states where they can terminate an employee without any prior notice. They tell us my country is doomed because here it's at least a 30 days period. CEOs are also signing prepaid two year AI contracts. I'm having a hard time understanding anything anymore.

[november@app.wafrn.net]

@beyondmachines1@infosec.exchange

Why did this loser use an LLM to write this?

[dl2jml@mastodon.radio]

@beyondmachines1 So it will be put in every smartphone on this planet.

[wesdym@mastodon.social]

@foolishowl Yes, that would lead to mutual ruin -- the second result Marx specific. You're just describing a specific version of it.

[vive_levant@masto.bike]

@raymaccarthy @beyondmachines1 s/it would only really be a toy/you would only really be a tool

Edit : I misread the original so here is what I intended originally for the sentence to look like.

#thereifixedyourtoot

[raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie]

@Vive_Levant @beyondmachines1
I've used real, working computer tools professionally for decades and written them.
Also computer toys. I know the difference.

[vive_levant@masto.bike]

@raymaccarthy @beyondmachines1 you can check the two possibilities of the third meaning to get my point : https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tool

[vive_levant@masto.bike]

@raymaccarthy @beyondmachines1 oups, my bad, I overlooked your sentence and was certain to have read « YOU would only really be a toy. »
In this case my substitution worked, but you were right, with IT, it didn’t. Apologies.

[wesdym@mastodon.social]

@lastdinosaur Mature adults don't use that word that way. You should know better.

[wesdym@mastodon.social]

@fightscore There are things it's proven very good at, mostly things it's already been doing for some years. Protein-folding, for example.

At the risk of discomforting some people, a good way to think about it is that AI tends to be good at things that autistic people are -- monotonous scanning, counting, etc. -- but has essentially perfect memory compared to humans, and far more powerful computational capacity. So it's good at things that require those tasks.

But not most other stuff.

[wesdym@mastodon.social]

@kepeken What gives you that impression? Please don't tell me that you're one of those people who confuses competent literacy with fakery.

[chantaryu2@pataterie.ca]

@ElHadjiMurad @beyondmachines1 no worries

[beyondmachines1@infosec.exchange]

@PTR_K sorry about that.

[beyondmachines1@infosec.exchange]

@capnthommo not sure. Don't stop your enemy when they are making a mistake still stands.

[beyondmachines1@infosec.exchange]

@kookie maybe they did. I've been speaking this same thing for about a year at conferences full of HR and CEOs. No takers until they see the invoice.

[kgmadee2@mathstodon.xyz]

@fh0 profile pic checks out

[terminhell@mastodon.social]

@beyondmachines1 As a follow up, a Meta DC is being built just miles from my house. Two power plants are part of the deal...a backup power plant.

[mycotropic@beige.party]

@kepeken @beyondmachines1

Drop in, stir some shit, ghost; I know that pattern as well and the response is; #WhackATroll good bye

[ptr_k@dice.camp]

@beyondmachines1
No need for apology. It's an apt description.