If NAT is security, double NAT must be double security!
-
If NAT is security, double NAT must be double security!
@catsalad If reverse proxy is security.... Actually maybe that would be double? Hmmmm
-
If NAT is security, double NAT must be double security!
@catsalad it isn’t exponential?
-
@dazo@infosec.exchange @catsalad@infosec.exchange indeed, i forward my server's ssh port to a vps using
autosshso i can easily log in remotely and access everything on the lan from there
i don't mind accessing things in an ad hoc manner so i haven't bothered with a full vpn yet -
If NAT is security, double NAT must be double security!
@catsalad More hairpins in my NAT than a drag queen's wig.
-
@catsalad if ROT13 is encryption, double ROT13 must be double encryption!
-
@chronovore Wasn't that recommendation Double-ROT26 instead?
-
If NAT is security, double NAT must be double security!
-
If NAT is security, double NAT must be double security!
@catsalad From 2FAto 2FNAT? To 12 Factor NAT?
-
@chronovore Wasn't that recommendation Double-ROT26 instead?
-
@chronovore Wasn't that recommendation Double-ROT26 instead?
@chronovore You know... the 13 in ROT13 stands for v1, 3rd grade encryption. So the improved version is v2, 6th grade encryption, hence: ROT26 of the Rorschach-Ohm-Tyson algorithm...
-
@chronovore Oh, maybe I should add this to my CV: Master of Bad Advice.
Maybe not. Hmmm...
-
If NAT is security, double NAT must be double security!
@catsalad good luck, I’m behind seven NATs
-
@catsalad if ROT13 is encryption, double ROT13 must be double encryption!
-
@catsalad@infosec.exchange that's why i have triple NAT
CG-NAT
NAT in the shitty ISP modem/router
NAT in my own router
no way to open up ports anyway on this ISP anyway so i'm not really losing anything -
@catsalad if ROT13 is encryption, double ROT13 must be double encryption!
if i'm not mistaken, https is end-to-end encryption for everything already.
-
@catsalad if ROT13 is encryption, double ROT13 must be double encryption!
-
@badsamurai @jiub 3 Extra Natties!
