Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out
-
Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out
@verge Discord self-destructs
-
Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out
@verge Wooow... I'd have to jump ship soon then.
-
Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out
@verge strange optics considering they got hacked and this data got leaked for their UK users
-
Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out
@verge What?! Why do they always want an ID? Why can't they tell people to go to the DMV for once? Can't they at least make the surveillance inconvenient?
-
Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out
@verge I rarely use Discord, and don't like it much, so no loss when I cancel my membership.
-
Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out
Discord can fuck off.
-
@verge what exactly is the problem with this feature? How I understand, discord ist still accessible without any ID check, only adult content will be locked behind a verification wall, which isn’t something bad I think. Other platforms like reddit should do so as well, just asking for age isn’t really a working strategy
@gerenuk @verge
Hacks aside, DHS/ICE/other arms of a fascist state will be able to tie community membership to identities more easily, over time this can lead to China style control over dissenting speech.
But even before that happens, Project 2025 just wants to treat LGBTQ communities/topics as adult only. Without decentralised, easily self hosted, numerous alternatives to discord, these vulnerable groups get the double whammy of being doxxed and of rejecting younglings that need them. -
Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out
@verge @Bellingcat what's going to happen to your community then?
-
Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out
It's just as well I'd rather drink a pint of hot and chunky sick than use discord.
Putting useful stuff in a members-only corporate silo is the action of a thoughtless moron and I'm not going to join the lunacy.
Also, I really don't need yet another account for yet another thing I hate.
-
I get what you're saying but the whole "normie" assumption tends to be what gets in the way. We've all seen the big posters on various Linux forums who should have been banned years ago because they're militantly unwilling to actually help.
Some of my favourite people are former clients who graduated from needing to buy my services to keep their PC running. I feel warmly smug about explaining what I was doing to them well.
-
IRC and a small forum work pretty well, too. I mean, chatting alongside a stream is IRC in a trench coat.
-
Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out
-
Somewhere I typed up a list of my requirements (I can't speak for everyone); I'll have to dig that up..
Revolt does actually meet them all, afaict; the only obstacles are logistical/strategic.
I'm familiar(ish) with RocketChat and Mattermost, but was underwhelmed; I'll have to investigate the other two (thanks for the leads!).
@PandaCab @feorag @netskaven @verge
Pumble looks to be proprietary, which is an immediate disqualifier.
-
@PandaCab @feorag @netskaven @verge
Pumble looks to be proprietary, which is an immediate disqualifier.
@PandaCab @feorag @netskaven @verge
...and Guilded is no longer available (which shows one compelling reason why proprietary software is not an option).
-
Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month https://www.theverge.com/tech/875309/discord-age-verification-global-roll-out
@verge What is "full access"?
Shouldn't there be an age cap there instead? Like no one over 16?
-
@verge never understood why people use this garbage tier service. I used it for a brief spell some years ago - absolutely hated everything about it. Hard to find info - crap organization, lame monetizing scheme. Total trash. This should be the needle that breaks the camels back for many.
@sayonaraminasan @verge It's been fine as a modern alternative to IRC with voice and video chat. Not amazing, but fine. It is absolutely *awful* for distribution of information and I do not understand why anyone would use it for that.
-
@sayonaraminasan @verge It's been fine as a modern alternative to IRC with voice and video chat. Not amazing, but fine. It is absolutely *awful* for distribution of information and I do not understand why anyone would use it for that.
@StarkRG discords garbage. Has been the whole time. Performs like shit, organized like shit, shit tier slop that’s now forcing users to upload their
it’s gonna burn. -
@StarkRG discords garbage. Has been the whole time. Performs like shit, organized like shit, shit tier slop that’s now forcing users to upload their
it’s gonna burn.@sayonaraminasan Yeah, that definitely hasn't been my experience. It's worked better than zoom, for example, and has been more friendly than Facebook (which, I realise, isn't saying much, but it's a benchmark anyway). It's worked well enough that I didn't look for an alternative until about a year ago.
I'm not sure what you mean by being organised like shit, it's organised like a chat program. It's better than IRC in many ways, which is kind of the metric to measure chat programs against.
-
@sayonaraminasan Yeah, that definitely hasn't been my experience. It's worked better than zoom, for example, and has been more friendly than Facebook (which, I realise, isn't saying much, but it's a benchmark anyway). It's worked well enough that I didn't look for an alternative until about a year ago.
I'm not sure what you mean by being organised like shit, it's organised like a chat program. It's better than IRC in many ways, which is kind of the metric to measure chat programs against.
@StarkRG don’t know what you’re trying to prove here, that discord isn’t a privacy violating shit box? Cuz that’s not a cookie you’re gonna sell me, bro lol it’s garbage which is why I don’t use it. Happy you enjoyed the trash tho.
-
@StarkRG don’t know what you’re trying to prove here, that discord isn’t a privacy violating shit box? Cuz that’s not a cookie you’re gonna sell me, bro lol it’s garbage which is why I don’t use it. Happy you enjoyed the trash tho.
@sayonaraminasan I'm not trying to prove anything and there's no reason for you to be so aggressively defensive. Nobody's attacking you and there's nothing you need to prove to anyone. I've merely had a different experience from you, at least not until the last couple of years. That said, I agree that recently it's been awful.
I still don't know what you mean by being organised poorly, though. How should a chat program be organised that is different from what discord has done?
