Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see.

So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
44 Posts 29 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

    Note that this rewrite has a lot of resources at its disposal. The porting.md file has a ton of direction, more than historically an LLM can keep track of: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/46d3bc29f270fa881dd5730ef1549e88407701a5/docs/PORTING.md

    But Anthropic acquired Bun, so I imagine this project has effectively as many tokens to use as it wants.

    If this rewrite succeeds, this will effectively not only be a "fuck you Zig for not accepting my AIgen patches", it'll be a big headline and marketing story for Anthropic: look! Claude could rewrite Bun from Zig to Rust!

    It's hard for me to read this then as anything but an experiment to see if Anthropic can get a big marketing boost in favor of vibecoding from.

    cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
    cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
    cwebber@social.coop
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    But this won't be an ordinary vibecoding story if it succeeds, but it might *look that way* from a marketing perspective. It has the lead maintainer giving a *ton* of guidance and perspective. It has the resources of Anthropic itself at its disposal. And it has the perfect story attached to it, so there's a lot to win if it succeeds, and little to lose if it doesn't, since the failure can just be ignored and they can move on.

    wakame@tech.lgbtW 64kb@icosahedron.website6 cwebber@social.coopC 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

      Note that this rewrite has a lot of resources at its disposal. The porting.md file has a ton of direction, more than historically an LLM can keep track of: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/46d3bc29f270fa881dd5730ef1549e88407701a5/docs/PORTING.md

      But Anthropic acquired Bun, so I imagine this project has effectively as many tokens to use as it wants.

      If this rewrite succeeds, this will effectively not only be a "fuck you Zig for not accepting my AIgen patches", it'll be a big headline and marketing story for Anthropic: look! Claude could rewrite Bun from Zig to Rust!

      It's hard for me to read this then as anything but an experiment to see if Anthropic can get a big marketing boost in favor of vibecoding from.

      hellbeast@pleroma.envs.netH This user is from outside of this forum
      hellbeast@pleroma.envs.netH This user is from outside of this forum
      hellbeast@pleroma.envs.net
      wrote last edited by
      #5
      @cwebber stories like these make me want to quit computing entirely, i'm tired of this, i'm tired of sharing spaces and hats with this capital machine
      Link Preview Image
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

        But this won't be an ordinary vibecoding story if it succeeds, but it might *look that way* from a marketing perspective. It has the lead maintainer giving a *ton* of guidance and perspective. It has the resources of Anthropic itself at its disposal. And it has the perfect story attached to it, so there's a lot to win if it succeeds, and little to lose if it doesn't, since the failure can just be ignored and they can move on.

        wakame@tech.lgbtW This user is from outside of this forum
        wakame@tech.lgbtW This user is from outside of this forum
        wakame@tech.lgbt
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @cwebber

        while(not_ported_correctly) {
        manually_add_guidelines();
        }
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
          cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
          cwebber@social.coop
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @be Oops! Thx. Transposition!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

            So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

            - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
            - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
            - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
            - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

            What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

            > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

            Link Preview Image
            Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

            I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

            favicon

            Nitter (xcancel.com)

            What can we make of this?

            ridley@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
            ridley@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
            ridley@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @cwebber > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

            Clearly someone whose professional opinions should be trusted. /s

            ridley@hachyderm.ioR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

              Note that this rewrite has a lot of resources at its disposal. The porting.md file has a ton of direction, more than historically an LLM can keep track of: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/46d3bc29f270fa881dd5730ef1549e88407701a5/docs/PORTING.md

              But Anthropic acquired Bun, so I imagine this project has effectively as many tokens to use as it wants.

              If this rewrite succeeds, this will effectively not only be a "fuck you Zig for not accepting my AIgen patches", it'll be a big headline and marketing story for Anthropic: look! Claude could rewrite Bun from Zig to Rust!

              It's hard for me to read this then as anything but an experiment to see if Anthropic can get a big marketing boost in favor of vibecoding from.

              federicomena@mstdn.mxF This user is from outside of this forum
              federicomena@mstdn.mxF This user is from outside of this forum
              federicomena@mstdn.mx
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @cwebber I don't understand being the lead of a project, ostensibly understanding most of the code and its history, and slopping it up into an AI translation that you don't know at all. Yes, please turn my carefully handcrafted artifact into a pile of legacy code, at scale.

              vathpela@infosec.exchangeV penguin42@mastodon.org.ukP ggherdov@fosstodon.orgG 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • ridley@hachyderm.ioR ridley@hachyderm.io

                @cwebber > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                Clearly someone whose professional opinions should be trusted. /s

                ridley@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                ridley@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                ridley@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                @cwebber Maybe I'll just save that comment for the next time I feel imposters' syndrome.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                  So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                  - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                  - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                  - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                  - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                  What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                  > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                  I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                  favicon

                  Nitter (xcancel.com)

                  What can we make of this?

                  dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dalias@hachyderm.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @cwebber LMAO at these Bun clowns. Props to Zig folks for shooting down their slop without even having to mention that it's slop.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                    Note that this rewrite has a lot of resources at its disposal. The porting.md file has a ton of direction, more than historically an LLM can keep track of: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/46d3bc29f270fa881dd5730ef1549e88407701a5/docs/PORTING.md

                    But Anthropic acquired Bun, so I imagine this project has effectively as many tokens to use as it wants.

                    If this rewrite succeeds, this will effectively not only be a "fuck you Zig for not accepting my AIgen patches", it'll be a big headline and marketing story for Anthropic: look! Claude could rewrite Bun from Zig to Rust!

                    It's hard for me to read this then as anything but an experiment to see if Anthropic can get a big marketing boost in favor of vibecoding from.

                    aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                    aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                    aburka@hachyderm.io
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @cwebber I agree, it actually has little to do with the Zig compiler's AI ban. Zig isn't saying "please don't write zig apps using AI"

                    aburka@hachyderm.ioA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • aburka@hachyderm.ioA aburka@hachyderm.io

                      @cwebber I agree, it actually has little to do with the Zig compiler's AI ban. Zig isn't saying "please don't write zig apps using AI"

                      aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                      aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                      aburka@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @cwebber also holy crap that is an *extensive* porting guide

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                        So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                        - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                        - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                        - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                        - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                        What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                        > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                        I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                        favicon

                        Nitter (xcancel.com)

                        What can we make of this?

                        algernon@come-from.mad-scientist.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
                        algernon@come-from.mad-scientist.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
                        algernon@come-from.mad-scientist.club
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @cwebber

                        What can we make of this?

                        Silicon Valley White Men need therapy, badly, because they're out of touch with reality.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                          So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                          - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                          - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                          - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                          - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                          What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                          > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                          I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                          favicon

                          Nitter (xcancel.com)

                          What can we make of this?

                          defuneste@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                          defuneste@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                          defuneste@fosstodon.org
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          I do not know much but giving infinite money to some folks seems to cause issues..

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aburka@hachyderm.io
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            @be @cwebber not clear to me that changing the implementation language to rust will help with that though

                            liberty@mathstodon.xyzL 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • aburka@hachyderm.ioA aburka@hachyderm.io

                              @be @cwebber not clear to me that changing the implementation language to rust will help with that though

                              liberty@mathstodon.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                              liberty@mathstodon.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                              liberty@mathstodon.xyz
                              wrote last edited by
                              #17

                              @aburka @be @cwebber Unfortunately Rust hasn't come out nearly as strongly against LLMs used in contributions

                              aburka@hachyderm.ioA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • liberty@mathstodon.xyzL liberty@mathstodon.xyz

                                @aburka @be @cwebber Unfortunately Rust hasn't come out nearly as strongly against LLMs used in contributions

                                aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                                aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                                aburka@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #18

                                @liberty @be @cwebber true, but they're not exactly notorious for moving quickly on language changes

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  datarama@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #19

                                  @be @cwebber The entirety of the software world by now feels like one massive, foul-smelling heap of high-yield embarrassment.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • federicomena@mstdn.mxF federicomena@mstdn.mx

                                    @cwebber I don't understand being the lead of a project, ostensibly understanding most of the code and its history, and slopping it up into an AI translation that you don't know at all. Yes, please turn my carefully handcrafted artifact into a pile of legacy code, at scale.

                                    vathpela@infosec.exchangeV This user is from outside of this forum
                                    vathpela@infosec.exchangeV This user is from outside of this forum
                                    vathpela@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #20

                                    @federicomena @cwebber Except the "at scale" part is a bit of an illusion. It's a one-off with resources almost no other project can hope to have in the near term.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                      So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                                      - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                                      - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                                      - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                                      - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                                      What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                                      > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                                      I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                                      favicon

                                      Nitter (xcancel.com)

                                      What can we make of this?

                                      reiddragon@fedi.catto.gardenR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      reiddragon@fedi.catto.gardenR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      reiddragon@fedi.catto.garden
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #21
                                      @cwebber It's people like this for whom the saying "don't get high off your own supply" was coined
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                        So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                                        - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                                        - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                                        - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                                        - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                                        What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                                        > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                                        I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                                        favicon

                                        Nitter (xcancel.com)

                                        What can we make of this?

                                        m3tti@functional.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        m3tti@functional.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        m3tti@functional.cafe
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #22

                                        @cwebber i would love to tell this guy in the twitter post. "I would rather read the opinion of an ai about that topic than reading your opinion about this topic".

                                        EDIT: I'm pretty sure this entire bubble will pop and we just get something out of it like rad tools that also died slowly in the end. Reinforcment learning where people could "teach" a system what replies are good was allready testen by microslop looong ago. And it lead to a nazi anti feminism war loving shithead system. And now we are doing the same with more data

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                          So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                                          - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                                          - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                                          - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                                          - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                                          What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                                          > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                                          I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                                          favicon

                                          Nitter (xcancel.com)

                                          What can we make of this?

                                          blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          blogdiva@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @cwebber that Zig should stay the course and not let Bun nor Anthropic live rent-free in their minds nor repository ―because they will fail.

                                          of course, they won't admit it, but given AIsloppers’ record of debugging, securing and documenting the shit they extrude with AI, someone will need what they originally wanted: Zig.

                                          beside staying the course, they should lawyer up and have them review any licensing infringements.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups