Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see.

So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
44 Posts 29 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

    So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

    - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
    - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
    - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
    - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

    What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

    > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

    Link Preview Image
    Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

    I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

    favicon

    Nitter (xcancel.com)

    What can we make of this?

    algernon@come-from.mad-scientist.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
    algernon@come-from.mad-scientist.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
    algernon@come-from.mad-scientist.club
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @cwebber

    What can we make of this?

    Silicon Valley White Men need therapy, badly, because they're out of touch with reality.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

      So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

      - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
      - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
      - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
      - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

      What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

      > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

      Link Preview Image
      Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

      I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

      favicon

      Nitter (xcancel.com)

      What can we make of this?

      defuneste@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
      defuneste@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
      defuneste@fosstodon.org
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      I do not know much but giving infinite money to some folks seems to cause issues..

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
        aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
        aburka@hachyderm.io
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @be @cwebber not clear to me that changing the implementation language to rust will help with that though

        liberty@mathstodon.xyzL 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • aburka@hachyderm.ioA aburka@hachyderm.io

          @be @cwebber not clear to me that changing the implementation language to rust will help with that though

          liberty@mathstodon.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
          liberty@mathstodon.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
          liberty@mathstodon.xyz
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @aburka @be @cwebber Unfortunately Rust hasn't come out nearly as strongly against LLMs used in contributions

          aburka@hachyderm.ioA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • liberty@mathstodon.xyzL liberty@mathstodon.xyz

            @aburka @be @cwebber Unfortunately Rust hasn't come out nearly as strongly against LLMs used in contributions

            aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
            aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
            aburka@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @liberty @be @cwebber true, but they're not exactly notorious for moving quickly on language changes

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
              datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
              datarama@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @be @cwebber The entirety of the software world by now feels like one massive, foul-smelling heap of high-yield embarrassment.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • federicomena@mstdn.mxF federicomena@mstdn.mx

                @cwebber I don't understand being the lead of a project, ostensibly understanding most of the code and its history, and slopping it up into an AI translation that you don't know at all. Yes, please turn my carefully handcrafted artifact into a pile of legacy code, at scale.

                vathpela@infosec.exchangeV This user is from outside of this forum
                vathpela@infosec.exchangeV This user is from outside of this forum
                vathpela@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @federicomena @cwebber Except the "at scale" part is a bit of an illusion. It's a one-off with resources almost no other project can hope to have in the near term.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                  So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                  - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                  - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                  - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                  - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                  What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                  > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                  I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                  favicon

                  Nitter (xcancel.com)

                  What can we make of this?

                  reiddragon@fedi.catto.gardenR This user is from outside of this forum
                  reiddragon@fedi.catto.gardenR This user is from outside of this forum
                  reiddragon@fedi.catto.garden
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21
                  @cwebber It's people like this for whom the saying "don't get high off your own supply" was coined
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                    So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                    - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                    - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                    - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                    - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                    What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                    > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                    I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                    favicon

                    Nitter (xcancel.com)

                    What can we make of this?

                    m3tti@functional.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    m3tti@functional.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    m3tti@functional.cafe
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @cwebber i would love to tell this guy in the twitter post. "I would rather read the opinion of an ai about that topic than reading your opinion about this topic".

                    EDIT: I'm pretty sure this entire bubble will pop and we just get something out of it like rad tools that also died slowly in the end. Reinforcment learning where people could "teach" a system what replies are good was allready testen by microslop looong ago. And it lead to a nazi anti feminism war loving shithead system. And now we are doing the same with more data

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                      So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                      - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                      - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                      - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                      - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                      What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                      > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                      I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                      favicon

                      Nitter (xcancel.com)

                      What can we make of this?

                      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      blogdiva@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @cwebber that Zig should stay the course and not let Bun nor Anthropic live rent-free in their minds nor repository ―because they will fail.

                      of course, they won't admit it, but given AIsloppers’ record of debugging, securing and documenting the shit they extrude with AI, someone will need what they originally wanted: Zig.

                      beside staying the course, they should lawyer up and have them review any licensing infringements.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                        So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                        - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                        - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                        - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                        - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                        What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                        > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                        I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                        favicon

                        Nitter (xcancel.com)

                        What can we make of this?

                        gbrlsnchs@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gbrlsnchs@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gbrlsnchs@hachyderm.io
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @cwebber Who would've guessed?! It's the same guy that wanted to hire developers to work extensive hours a day for the Bun project before LLMs were a thing. Of course that type of people will align with LLM replacing human labor.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • federicomena@mstdn.mxF federicomena@mstdn.mx

                          @cwebber I don't understand being the lead of a project, ostensibly understanding most of the code and its history, and slopping it up into an AI translation that you don't know at all. Yes, please turn my carefully handcrafted artifact into a pile of legacy code, at scale.

                          penguin42@mastodon.org.ukP This user is from outside of this forum
                          penguin42@mastodon.org.ukP This user is from outside of this forum
                          penguin42@mastodon.org.uk
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @federicomena @cwebber It depends if it keeps the structure that you understand and just does the legwork of the reworking for language; properly guided it may well do that.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                            So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                            - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                            - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                            - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                            - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                            What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                            > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                            Link Preview Image
                            Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                            I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                            favicon

                            Nitter (xcancel.com)

                            What can we make of this?

                            zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
                            zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
                            zkat@fedi.zkat.tech
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            @cwebber that I'm now paranoid that by "doing research on competing implementations" he means "copycatting Kat's work" and now I'm glad that I've stopped working on orogene in public.

                            janl@narrativ.esJ 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ zkat@fedi.zkat.tech

                              @cwebber that I'm now paranoid that by "doing research on competing implementations" he means "copycatting Kat's work" and now I'm glad that I've stopped working on orogene in public.

                              janl@narrativ.esJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              janl@narrativ.esJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              janl@narrativ.es
                              wrote last edited by
                              #27

                              @zkat @cwebber jesus

                              zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • janl@narrativ.esJ janl@narrativ.es

                                @zkat @cwebber jesus

                                zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                zkat@fedi.zkat.tech
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                @janl @cwebber I mean not just mine, but pnpm and Yarn’s. The latter is also porting to Rust

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • janl@narrativ.esJ janl@narrativ.es

                                  @zkat @cwebber jesus

                                  cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #29

                                  @janl @zkat @cwebber seconding the "jesus"

                                  zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                    So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                                    - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                                    - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                                    - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                                    - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                                    What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                                    > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                                    I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                                    favicon

                                    Nitter (xcancel.com)

                                    What can we make of this?

                                    jrconlin@mindof.jrconlin.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jrconlin@mindof.jrconlin.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jrconlin@mindof.jrconlin.com
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #30

                                    @cwebber

                                    The thing I laugh about in all of this, the thing that is absolutely the funniest, is that while these AI generated or "rewritten" projects may be Open Source, it will never be free.

                                    It was created using a sizable investment.
                                    It can only be maintained by additional investment.
                                    No one, external, will want or be able to contribute, meaning no prospect of continuance.

                                    There will absolutely be licensing fees, because money has to come from somewhere, which absolutely undercuts whatever value they might think they're offering. That kind of renders these projects as instant abandon-ware, and any systems architect worth their salt is absolutely going to spot that red flag.

                                    Truly, the learning opportunities are endless.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev

                                      @janl @zkat @cwebber seconding the "jesus"

                                      zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      zkat@fedi.zkat.tech
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #31

                                      @cthos @janl @cwebber to be clear: I easily share my code with folks. I don't mind the "spirit" of foss. I take issue with having my work thrown into a soulless machine devoid of any of the community I would otherwise be building. I think it's healthy for us to look at each others' implementations and compare notes and have done a lot of that, and a lot of sharing of my own.

                                      but honestly, fuck Jarred in particular. He's always been kind of a dickbag.

                                      cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ zkat@fedi.zkat.tech

                                        @cthos @janl @cwebber to be clear: I easily share my code with folks. I don't mind the "spirit" of foss. I take issue with having my work thrown into a soulless machine devoid of any of the community I would otherwise be building. I think it's healthy for us to look at each others' implementations and compare notes and have done a lot of that, and a lot of sharing of my own.

                                        but honestly, fuck Jarred in particular. He's always been kind of a dickbag.

                                        cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #32

                                        @zkat @janl @cwebber yeah none of that was a reflection on you, just "holy shit what a shitshow" from bun / that guy.

                                        janl@narrativ.esJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev

                                          @zkat @janl @cwebber yeah none of that was a reflection on you, just "holy shit what a shitshow" from bun / that guy.

                                          janl@narrativ.esJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          janl@narrativ.esJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          janl@narrativ.es
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #33

                                          @cthos @zkat @cwebber this

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups