Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
82 Posts 37 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

    Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

    This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
    artemis@dice.camp
    wrote last edited by
    #44

    The US is a hollow nation. Hollowed out over decades. In the coming years, everyone is about to find out that there is not much left.

    We haven't quite reached the point where they try to strip the last of the drapes & furniture out of the White House to sell, but it feels like we're close, doesn't it? They are stealing & grifting absolutely anything & everything that they can.

    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI burnitdown@beige.partyB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

      @artemis Fair. There's been issues with contractors and suppliers taking advantage of US military contracts for decades, which I imagine has only gotten worse.
      Like, an ex of mine use to talk about how they weren't allowed to maintain a lot of their own equipment when she was stationed in the middle east for the forever wars - they had to get an approved maintainer through the contracted company to do repairs and shit (at high cost, often slow).
      Which seems... absurd to me.

      artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
      artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
      artemis@dice.camp
      wrote last edited by
      #45

      @miss_rodent
      Yep. The corruption isn't new. Just worse than ever!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • woozle@toot.catW woozle@toot.cat

        @artemis I believe Arthur C. Clarke wrote a short story about this back in the 50s -- "Supremacy" or something like that. (I looked it up recently, can find it again if you're curious.)

        #TASAT

        artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
        artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
        artemis@dice.camp
        wrote last edited by
        #46

        @woozle
        I would be interested.

        woozle@toot.catW jherazob@mastodon.ieJ 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

          @artemis Fair. There's been issues with contractors and suppliers taking advantage of US military contracts for decades, which I imagine has only gotten worse.
          Like, an ex of mine use to talk about how they weren't allowed to maintain a lot of their own equipment when she was stationed in the middle east for the forever wars - they had to get an approved maintainer through the contracted company to do repairs and shit (at high cost, often slow).
          Which seems... absurd to me.

          miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
          miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
          miss_rodent@girlcock.club
          wrote last edited by
          #47

          @artemis (also, the "american system" of manufacturing was literally designed around preventing exactly that sort of problem...
          *in 1820* yet, here we are again, somehow.)

          su_liam@mas.toS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

            So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

            Who could have known that having very expensive equipment & arms/ammunition that take a long time to make might not be an advantage?

            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
            quixoticgeek@social.v.st
            wrote last edited by
            #48

            @artemis i was watching a video on how well the US tanks were doing in Ukraine. Aside from the fact 90+% of them have been destroyed, one little nugget of info made me understand so much about US military doctrine and it's overwhelming weakness.

            An M1 Abrams tank, if you fill the fuel tank in the morning, and it sits idling all day (to power target systems and weapons etc...) by sundown the tank is empty, even if it doesn't move. How do you provide the logistics for that madness ?!??

            burnitdown@beige.partyB 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

              Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

              This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

              woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
              woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
              woozle@toot.cat
              wrote last edited by
              #49

              @artemis I've heard that the pattern with really powerful empires (Heinlein described them as "water empires", but I think we fit the pattern one way or another) is that they erode from within until they are so weak that the smallest push from outside can topple them. (I'm given to understand that this is what happened to the Romans.)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

                This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

                faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                faithisleaping@anarres.family
                wrote last edited by
                #50

                @artemis Oh, it always has been. See also the F-104 Starfighter.

                That plane was so bad it got the nickname "widowmaker" from the Germans because so many pilots died flying them. The reputation was so bad that the US (or Lockheed?) paid for an entire Top Gun knock-off movie to be made about them to try and salvage their reputation.

                Fix the problems? No. Just make a movie about how awesome our fancy plane is.

                thetenuousorder@meow.socialT simplicator@federate.socialS burnitdown@beige.partyB 4 Replies Last reply
                0
                • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                  Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

                  All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

                  woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                  woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                  woozle@toot.cat
                  wrote last edited by
                  #51

                  @artemis Also, it doesn't have to be old tech, or even non-digital, to be decisive: see, for example, how Ukraine has been using drones against the Russians.

                  (This also relates to a 1988 SF novel (I'm fulla those, aren't I) -- David's Sling -- about a battle to convince the US military to use mass-produced cheap weaponry when their entire model is based around gigacontracts handed out as political favors. #TASAT)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                    @woozle
                    I would be interested.

                    woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                    woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                    woozle@toot.cat
                    wrote last edited by
                    #52

                    @artemis Ok, I was close -- it's called "Superiority". I came across it in Clarke's short-story collection Expedition to Earth... aha! Found the full text here. ^.^

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                      @artemis Oh, it always has been. See also the F-104 Starfighter.

                      That plane was so bad it got the nickname "widowmaker" from the Germans because so many pilots died flying them. The reputation was so bad that the US (or Lockheed?) paid for an entire Top Gun knock-off movie to be made about them to try and salvage their reputation.

                      Fix the problems? No. Just make a movie about how awesome our fancy plane is.

                      thetenuousorder@meow.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      thetenuousorder@meow.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      thetenuousorder@meow.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #53

                      @faithisleaping @artemis any time a general beats the US in a wargame by something as simple as relaying intel on bikes or something his side gets handicapped so hard in order to get an egostroking US victory, so no one actually sees how to fight

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • avuko@infosec.exchangeA avuko@infosec.exchange

                        @artemis

                        Okay, okay, one more example, just for fun.

                        The sober comment of a NATO commander afterwards: “We’re fucked.”

                        Link Preview Image
                        Exercise: Ukrainian drone pilots wipe out NATO battalions

                        During the "Hedgehog 2025" exercise in Estonia, NATO troops were clearly shown their limits in a duel with Ukrainian drone teams.

                        favicon

                        Militär Aktuell – Militär News & Analysen zu internationalen Krisen, Streitkräften & der Defence-Industrie (militaeraktuell.at)

                        avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                        avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                        avuko@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #54

                        @artemis

                        US has burned through ‘years’ of munitions since start of Iran war

                        Rapid depletion of stockpile including Tomahawk missiles raises pressure on Trump over cost of conflict

                        archive.is

                        favicon

                        (archive.is)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                          @woozle
                          I would be interested.

                          jherazob@mastodon.ieJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jherazob@mastodon.ieJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jherazob@mastodon.ie
                          wrote last edited by
                          #55

                          @artemis
                          Seems to be this one:
                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_(short_story)
                          @woozle

                          woozle@toot.catW 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jherazob@mastodon.ieJ jherazob@mastodon.ie

                            @artemis
                            Seems to be this one:
                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_(short_story)
                            @woozle

                            woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                            woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                            woozle@toot.cat
                            wrote last edited by
                            #56

                            @jherazob @artemis

                            Yes! See also...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                              The US is a hollow nation. Hollowed out over decades. In the coming years, everyone is about to find out that there is not much left.

                              We haven't quite reached the point where they try to strip the last of the drapes & furniture out of the White House to sell, but it feels like we're close, doesn't it? They are stealing & grifting absolutely anything & everything that they can.

                              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                              ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                              wrote last edited by
                              #57

                              @artemis yeah we've been chewing on this for a few months now (the military part)

                              and on the whole hollowing-out thing for quite a while

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

                                @artemis (also, the "american system" of manufacturing was literally designed around preventing exactly that sort of problem...
                                *in 1820* yet, here we are again, somehow.)

                                su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                                su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                                su_liam@mas.to
                                wrote last edited by
                                #58

                                @miss_rodent Nothing quite like a regime that altogether ignores the existing system.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                  So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

                                  Who could have known that having very expensive equipment & arms/ammunition that take a long time to make might not be an advantage?

                                  lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lightfighter@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #59

                                  @artemis Iran builds 100 missile per month, US produces maybe 20 interceptors per month. Not difficult math there.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                    Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

                                    All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

                                    krypt3ia@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    krypt3ia@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    krypt3ia@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #60

                                    @artemis https://archive.org/details/ird059

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                      Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

                                      All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

                                      josh@hactivedirectory.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      josh@hactivedirectory.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      josh@hactivedirectory.com
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #61

                                      @artemis see also "Train derailed by penny on track."

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                        Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

                                        All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

                                        chuff@bark.wolp.chatC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        chuff@bark.wolp.chatC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        chuff@bark.wolp.chat
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #62

                                        The world changed, and the US military's plan didn't. We've seen how cheap and powerful consumer tech has gotten, military grade is a waste at this point compared to cheap easy to make good enough tech.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                          Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

                                          This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

                                          ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ska@social.treehouse.systems
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #63

                                          @artemis The Pentagon failed 7 audits in a row, and is currently unable to account for 63% of its budget.

                                          63%.

                                          I don't think this money is going into weapons or geopolitical strategy meetings.

                                          n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups