Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
82 Posts 37 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

    Also, I suspect the US is going to turn out to not be as well-armed or prepared as they think because in Trump's kleptocracy, you gotta think some wild corruption is going to come to light & some armaments that are supposed to be there aren't & some equipment that is supposed to work doesn't.

    Theft. Fraud. Graft. Cutting corners. It's a mess for sure.

    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
    artemis@dice.camp
    wrote last edited by
    #36

    Would you honestly believe that there is a single part of the federal government that is not currently being stripped for parts & sold off? Is there a single part that isn't filthy with fraud & bribes & payouts?

    They have been destroying the ground beneath their (and our) feet for a while.

    artemis@dice.campA nanowiz@vmst.ioN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

      So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

      Who could have known that having very expensive equipment & arms/ammunition that take a long time to make might not be an advantage?

      evilotto@sfba.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      evilotto@sfba.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      evilotto@sfba.social
      wrote last edited by
      #37

      @artemis see also Millennium Challenge 2002.

      US forces get roasted in a wargame by an opposing force using unconventional tactics, pentagon brass declared unconventional tactics against the rules and declares that they won anyway.

      Link Preview Image
      Millennium Challenge 2002 - Wikipedia

      favicon

      (en.wikipedia.org)

      akamran@indieweb.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

        @artemis Even if the US military is as heavily armed as it's meant to be - they were for korea, vietnam, iraq, iraq again, afghanistan, etc. too.
        The US can be heavily armed and still get it's ass kicked.

        artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
        artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
        artemis@dice.camp
        wrote last edited by
        #38

        @miss_rodent
        Hundred percent. But I am pretty sure the whole federal government is hollow now, so this is going to go even worse.

        miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

          The Trump administration is possibly the most hopped-up on their own propaganda administration the US has ever seen. These people are drunk on it.

          They think they have a literally invincible army, & they believe that it is impossible for white people to lose to brown folks (among many, many other false beliefs that are going to kick them in the ass).

          aburtch@shakedown.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          aburtch@shakedown.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          aburtch@shakedown.social
          wrote last edited by
          #39

          @artemis Yeah, but I'm still waiting for them to get to the “find out" part.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

            So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

            Who could have known that having very expensive equipment & arms/ammunition that take a long time to make might not be an advantage?

            woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
            woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
            woozle@toot.cat
            wrote last edited by
            #40

            @artemis I believe Arthur C. Clarke wrote a short story about this back in the 50s -- "Supremacy" or something like that. (I looked it up recently, can find it again if you're curious.)

            #TASAT

            artemis@dice.campA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

              Would you honestly believe that there is a single part of the federal government that is not currently being stripped for parts & sold off? Is there a single part that isn't filthy with fraud & bribes & payouts?

              They have been destroying the ground beneath their (and our) feet for a while.

              artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
              artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
              artemis@dice.camp
              wrote last edited by
              #41

              Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

              This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

              artemis@dice.campA woozle@toot.catW faithisleaping@anarres.familyF ska@social.treehouse.systemsS 4 Replies Last reply
              0
              • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                @miss_rodent
                Hundred percent. But I am pretty sure the whole federal government is hollow now, so this is going to go even worse.

                miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                miss_rodent@girlcock.club
                wrote last edited by
                #42

                @artemis Fair. There's been issues with contractors and suppliers taking advantage of US military contracts for decades, which I imagine has only gotten worse.
                Like, an ex of mine use to talk about how they weren't allowed to maintain a lot of their own equipment when she was stationed in the middle east for the forever wars - they had to get an approved maintainer through the contracted company to do repairs and shit (at high cost, often slow).
                Which seems... absurd to me.

                artemis@dice.campA miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                  Since he keeps up on all this stuff & has knowledge of naval operations, spouse has a pretty good idea of what the Navy is capable of, & he thinks the US is pretty much fucked when it comes to the Straits of Hormuz.

                  They didn't even THINK about this once before doing it.

                  woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                  woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                  woozle@toot.cat
                  wrote last edited by
                  #43

                  @artemis The people doing the thinking want to weaken democracy worldwide, which means weaking nominally democratic governments worldwide -- which means weakening the US military, which is still not directly under the control of POTUS nor even the Wall Street oligarchy, is consistent with their goals.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                    Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

                    This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

                    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                    artemis@dice.camp
                    wrote last edited by
                    #44

                    The US is a hollow nation. Hollowed out over decades. In the coming years, everyone is about to find out that there is not much left.

                    We haven't quite reached the point where they try to strip the last of the drapes & furniture out of the White House to sell, but it feels like we're close, doesn't it? They are stealing & grifting absolutely anything & everything that they can.

                    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI burnitdown@beige.partyB 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

                      @artemis Fair. There's been issues with contractors and suppliers taking advantage of US military contracts for decades, which I imagine has only gotten worse.
                      Like, an ex of mine use to talk about how they weren't allowed to maintain a lot of their own equipment when she was stationed in the middle east for the forever wars - they had to get an approved maintainer through the contracted company to do repairs and shit (at high cost, often slow).
                      Which seems... absurd to me.

                      artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                      artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                      artemis@dice.camp
                      wrote last edited by
                      #45

                      @miss_rodent
                      Yep. The corruption isn't new. Just worse than ever!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • woozle@toot.catW woozle@toot.cat

                        @artemis I believe Arthur C. Clarke wrote a short story about this back in the 50s -- "Supremacy" or something like that. (I looked it up recently, can find it again if you're curious.)

                        #TASAT

                        artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                        artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                        artemis@dice.camp
                        wrote last edited by
                        #46

                        @woozle
                        I would be interested.

                        woozle@toot.catW jherazob@mastodon.ieJ 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

                          @artemis Fair. There's been issues with contractors and suppliers taking advantage of US military contracts for decades, which I imagine has only gotten worse.
                          Like, an ex of mine use to talk about how they weren't allowed to maintain a lot of their own equipment when she was stationed in the middle east for the forever wars - they had to get an approved maintainer through the contracted company to do repairs and shit (at high cost, often slow).
                          Which seems... absurd to me.

                          miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                          miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                          miss_rodent@girlcock.club
                          wrote last edited by
                          #47

                          @artemis (also, the "american system" of manufacturing was literally designed around preventing exactly that sort of problem...
                          *in 1820* yet, here we are again, somehow.)

                          su_liam@mas.toS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                            So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

                            Who could have known that having very expensive equipment & arms/ammunition that take a long time to make might not be an advantage?

                            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                            quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                            wrote last edited by
                            #48

                            @artemis i was watching a video on how well the US tanks were doing in Ukraine. Aside from the fact 90+% of them have been destroyed, one little nugget of info made me understand so much about US military doctrine and it's overwhelming weakness.

                            An M1 Abrams tank, if you fill the fuel tank in the morning, and it sits idling all day (to power target systems and weapons etc...) by sundown the tank is empty, even if it doesn't move. How do you provide the logistics for that madness ?!??

                            burnitdown@beige.partyB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                              Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

                              This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

                              woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                              woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                              woozle@toot.cat
                              wrote last edited by
                              #49

                              @artemis I've heard that the pattern with really powerful empires (Heinlein described them as "water empires", but I think we fit the pattern one way or another) is that they erode from within until they are so weak that the smallest push from outside can topple them. (I'm given to understand that this is what happened to the Romans.)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

                                This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

                                faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                faithisleaping@anarres.family
                                wrote last edited by
                                #50

                                @artemis Oh, it always has been. See also the F-104 Starfighter.

                                That plane was so bad it got the nickname "widowmaker" from the Germans because so many pilots died flying them. The reputation was so bad that the US (or Lockheed?) paid for an entire Top Gun knock-off movie to be made about them to try and salvage their reputation.

                                Fix the problems? No. Just make a movie about how awesome our fancy plane is.

                                thetenuousorder@meow.socialT simplicator@federate.socialS burnitdown@beige.partyB 4 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                  Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

                                  All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

                                  woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  woozle@toot.cat
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #51

                                  @artemis Also, it doesn't have to be old tech, or even non-digital, to be decisive: see, for example, how Ukraine has been using drones against the Russians.

                                  (This also relates to a 1988 SF novel (I'm fulla those, aren't I) -- David's Sling -- about a battle to convince the US military to use mass-produced cheap weaponry when their entire model is based around gigacontracts handed out as political favors. #TASAT)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                    @woozle
                                    I would be interested.

                                    woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    woozle@toot.cat
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #52

                                    @artemis Ok, I was close -- it's called "Superiority". I came across it in Clarke's short-story collection Expedition to Earth... aha! Found the full text here. ^.^

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                                      @artemis Oh, it always has been. See also the F-104 Starfighter.

                                      That plane was so bad it got the nickname "widowmaker" from the Germans because so many pilots died flying them. The reputation was so bad that the US (or Lockheed?) paid for an entire Top Gun knock-off movie to be made about them to try and salvage their reputation.

                                      Fix the problems? No. Just make a movie about how awesome our fancy plane is.

                                      thetenuousorder@meow.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      thetenuousorder@meow.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      thetenuousorder@meow.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #53

                                      @faithisleaping @artemis any time a general beats the US in a wargame by something as simple as relaying intel on bikes or something his side gets handicapped so hard in order to get an egostroking US victory, so no one actually sees how to fight

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • avuko@infosec.exchangeA avuko@infosec.exchange

                                        @artemis

                                        Okay, okay, one more example, just for fun.

                                        The sober comment of a NATO commander afterwards: “We’re fucked.”

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Exercise: Ukrainian drone pilots wipe out NATO battalions

                                        During the "Hedgehog 2025" exercise in Estonia, NATO troops were clearly shown their limits in a duel with Ukrainian drone teams.

                                        favicon

                                        Militär Aktuell – Militär News & Analysen zu internationalen Krisen, Streitkräften & der Defence-Industrie (militaeraktuell.at)

                                        avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        avuko@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #54

                                        @artemis

                                        US has burned through ‘years’ of munitions since start of Iran war

                                        Rapid depletion of stockpile including Tomahawk missiles raises pressure on Trump over cost of conflict

                                        archive.is

                                        favicon

                                        (archive.is)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                          @woozle
                                          I would be interested.

                                          jherazob@mastodon.ieJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jherazob@mastodon.ieJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jherazob@mastodon.ie
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #55

                                          @artemis
                                          Seems to be this one:
                                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_(short_story)
                                          @woozle

                                          woozle@toot.catW 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups