Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
82 Posts 37 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • woozle@toot.catW woozle@toot.cat

    @artemis I believe Arthur C. Clarke wrote a short story about this back in the 50s -- "Supremacy" or something like that. (I looked it up recently, can find it again if you're curious.)

    #TASAT

    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
    artemis@dice.camp
    wrote last edited by
    #46

    @woozle
    I would be interested.

    woozle@toot.catW jherazob@mastodon.ieJ 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

      @artemis Fair. There's been issues with contractors and suppliers taking advantage of US military contracts for decades, which I imagine has only gotten worse.
      Like, an ex of mine use to talk about how they weren't allowed to maintain a lot of their own equipment when she was stationed in the middle east for the forever wars - they had to get an approved maintainer through the contracted company to do repairs and shit (at high cost, often slow).
      Which seems... absurd to me.

      miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
      miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
      miss_rodent@girlcock.club
      wrote last edited by
      #47

      @artemis (also, the "american system" of manufacturing was literally designed around preventing exactly that sort of problem...
      *in 1820* yet, here we are again, somehow.)

      su_liam@mas.toS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

        So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

        Who could have known that having very expensive equipment & arms/ammunition that take a long time to make might not be an advantage?

        quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
        quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
        quixoticgeek@social.v.st
        wrote last edited by
        #48

        @artemis i was watching a video on how well the US tanks were doing in Ukraine. Aside from the fact 90+% of them have been destroyed, one little nugget of info made me understand so much about US military doctrine and it's overwhelming weakness.

        An M1 Abrams tank, if you fill the fuel tank in the morning, and it sits idling all day (to power target systems and weapons etc...) by sundown the tank is empty, even if it doesn't move. How do you provide the logistics for that madness ?!??

        burnitdown@beige.partyB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

          Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

          This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

          woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
          woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
          woozle@toot.cat
          wrote last edited by
          #49

          @artemis I've heard that the pattern with really powerful empires (Heinlein described them as "water empires", but I think we fit the pattern one way or another) is that they erode from within until they are so weak that the smallest push from outside can topple them. (I'm given to understand that this is what happened to the Romans.)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

            Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

            This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

            faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
            faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
            faithisleaping@anarres.family
            wrote last edited by
            #50

            @artemis Oh, it always has been. See also the F-104 Starfighter.

            That plane was so bad it got the nickname "widowmaker" from the Germans because so many pilots died flying them. The reputation was so bad that the US (or Lockheed?) paid for an entire Top Gun knock-off movie to be made about them to try and salvage their reputation.

            Fix the problems? No. Just make a movie about how awesome our fancy plane is.

            thetenuousorder@meow.socialT simplicator@federate.socialS burnitdown@beige.partyB 4 Replies Last reply
            0
            • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

              Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

              All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

              woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
              woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
              woozle@toot.cat
              wrote last edited by
              #51

              @artemis Also, it doesn't have to be old tech, or even non-digital, to be decisive: see, for example, how Ukraine has been using drones against the Russians.

              (This also relates to a 1988 SF novel (I'm fulla those, aren't I) -- David's Sling -- about a battle to convince the US military to use mass-produced cheap weaponry when their entire model is based around gigacontracts handed out as political favors. #TASAT)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                @woozle
                I would be interested.

                woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                woozle@toot.cat
                wrote last edited by
                #52

                @artemis Ok, I was close -- it's called "Superiority". I came across it in Clarke's short-story collection Expedition to Earth... aha! Found the full text here. ^.^

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                  @artemis Oh, it always has been. See also the F-104 Starfighter.

                  That plane was so bad it got the nickname "widowmaker" from the Germans because so many pilots died flying them. The reputation was so bad that the US (or Lockheed?) paid for an entire Top Gun knock-off movie to be made about them to try and salvage their reputation.

                  Fix the problems? No. Just make a movie about how awesome our fancy plane is.

                  thetenuousorder@meow.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  thetenuousorder@meow.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  thetenuousorder@meow.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #53

                  @faithisleaping @artemis any time a general beats the US in a wargame by something as simple as relaying intel on bikes or something his side gets handicapped so hard in order to get an egostroking US victory, so no one actually sees how to fight

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • avuko@infosec.exchangeA avuko@infosec.exchange

                    @artemis

                    Okay, okay, one more example, just for fun.

                    The sober comment of a NATO commander afterwards: “We’re fucked.”

                    Link Preview Image
                    Exercise: Ukrainian drone pilots wipe out NATO battalions

                    During the "Hedgehog 2025" exercise in Estonia, NATO troops were clearly shown their limits in a duel with Ukrainian drone teams.

                    favicon

                    Militär Aktuell – Militär News & Analysen zu internationalen Krisen, Streitkräften & der Defence-Industrie (militaeraktuell.at)

                    avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                    avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                    avuko@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #54

                    @artemis

                    US has burned through ‘years’ of munitions since start of Iran war

                    Rapid depletion of stockpile including Tomahawk missiles raises pressure on Trump over cost of conflict

                    archive.is

                    favicon

                    (archive.is)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                      @woozle
                      I would be interested.

                      jherazob@mastodon.ieJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jherazob@mastodon.ieJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jherazob@mastodon.ie
                      wrote last edited by
                      #55

                      @artemis
                      Seems to be this one:
                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_(short_story)
                      @woozle

                      woozle@toot.catW 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jherazob@mastodon.ieJ jherazob@mastodon.ie

                        @artemis
                        Seems to be this one:
                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_(short_story)
                        @woozle

                        woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                        woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                        woozle@toot.cat
                        wrote last edited by
                        #56

                        @jherazob @artemis

                        Yes! See also...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                          The US is a hollow nation. Hollowed out over decades. In the coming years, everyone is about to find out that there is not much left.

                          We haven't quite reached the point where they try to strip the last of the drapes & furniture out of the White House to sell, but it feels like we're close, doesn't it? They are stealing & grifting absolutely anything & everything that they can.

                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                          wrote last edited by
                          #57

                          @artemis yeah we've been chewing on this for a few months now (the military part)

                          and on the whole hollowing-out thing for quite a while

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

                            @artemis (also, the "american system" of manufacturing was literally designed around preventing exactly that sort of problem...
                            *in 1820* yet, here we are again, somehow.)

                            su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                            su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                            su_liam@mas.to
                            wrote last edited by
                            #58

                            @miss_rodent Nothing quite like a regime that altogether ignores the existing system.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                              So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

                              Who could have known that having very expensive equipment & arms/ammunition that take a long time to make might not be an advantage?

                              lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lightfighter@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #59

                              @artemis Iran builds 100 missile per month, US produces maybe 20 interceptors per month. Not difficult math there.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

                                All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

                                krypt3ia@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
                                krypt3ia@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
                                krypt3ia@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #60

                                @artemis https://archive.org/details/ird059

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                  Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

                                  All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

                                  josh@hactivedirectory.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  josh@hactivedirectory.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  josh@hactivedirectory.com
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #61

                                  @artemis see also "Train derailed by penny on track."

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                    Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

                                    All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

                                    chuff@bark.wolp.chatC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    chuff@bark.wolp.chatC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    chuff@bark.wolp.chat
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #62

                                    The world changed, and the US military's plan didn't. We've seen how cheap and powerful consumer tech has gotten, military grade is a waste at this point compared to cheap easy to make good enough tech.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                      Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

                                      This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

                                      ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ska@social.treehouse.systems
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #63

                                      @artemis The Pentagon failed 7 audits in a row, and is currently unable to account for 63% of its budget.

                                      63%.

                                      I don't think this money is going into weapons or geopolitical strategy meetings.

                                      n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                        It's not a great time to be a "military superpower." All of your equipment costs too much, is overcomplicated & over-engineered & everyone involved is complacent & overconfident.

                                        This is like in Stargate when the Asgardians ask the humans for help because "we're too smart to think of the silly things you humans do, like using projectile weapons."

                                        cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cstamp@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #64

                                        @artemis The US had also fired the people who knew their jobs and fancy equipment doesn’t replace competence.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • evilotto@sfba.socialE evilotto@sfba.social

                                          @artemis see also Millennium Challenge 2002.

                                          US forces get roasted in a wargame by an opposing force using unconventional tactics, pentagon brass declared unconventional tactics against the rules and declares that they won anyway.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Millennium Challenge 2002 - Wikipedia

                                          favicon

                                          (en.wikipedia.org)

                                          akamran@indieweb.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          akamran@indieweb.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          akamran@indieweb.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #65

                                          @evilotto @artemis I remember when that happened! I remember reading about it and thinking we're going to get our asses handed to us by a bunch of guys with rocks some day -- and lo and behold, that day is nigh.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups