Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
63 Posts 50 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR ratsnakegames@mastodon.social

    @nila @0xabad1dea the auth process is "if the IETF isn't interested, it doesn't proceed to the RFC stage", apparently.

    You can't just post a standard, but you CAN just post a draft/proposal, which is what both this and "IPv8" are.

    nila@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
    nila@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
    nila@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #51

    @ratsnakegames @0xabad1dea Do you think an agent swarm led by an APT could social engineer its way into "the IETF"? Setting up web pages, blogs, arXiv submissions etc. for a network of sock puppets definitely seems within reach of such actors.

    (And, come to think of it, any other standards body...)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

      it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

      thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      thelancashireman@hostux.social
      wrote last edited by
      #52

      @0xabad1dea

      Reminds me of Doug Zongker's publication:
      http://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL_-1d9OSdk

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
        wrote last edited by
        #53

        @0xabad1dea
        Cat5e or Cat6 cable isn't good enough.
        You need Cat9 cable,

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

          @hugo @slothrop I’m saying it’s a pointed political statement and not a random joke https://infosec.exchange/@0xabad1dea/116419619962656186

          hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
          hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
          hugo@someone.elses.computer
          wrote last edited by
          #54

          @0xabad1dea @slothrop 👌🏻 no worries next time I won’t reply unless to say something deep and serious which is probably once a year for me on Mastodon. You can ignore me.
          Have a good day

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

            if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

            gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
            gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
            gudenau@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #55

            @0xabad1dea When I read the beginning of IPv8 I thought it was an April 1st one.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

              it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

              orb2069@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
              orb2069@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
              orb2069@mastodon.online
              wrote last edited by
              #56

              @0xabad1dea I think the somebody in question is @mat ?

              0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • orb2069@mastodon.onlineO orb2069@mastodon.online

                @0xabad1dea I think the somebody in question is @mat ?

                0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #57

                @Orb2069 @mat thank you, I didn't realize there was an official announcement post on mastodon for it

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                  it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                  eblu@wetdry.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                  eblu@wetdry.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                  eblu@wetdry.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #58

                  @0xabad1dea throwing in an obligatory shoutout to @mat for being the ietf kitty. cats deserve credit

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                    it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                    shadowdancer@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    shadowdancer@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    shadowdancer@mstdn.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #59

                    @0xabad1dea
                    Okay, this is cool, my #cat would likely benefit from this. Does anyone know if there's someone already implementing this?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                      it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      blogdiva@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #60

                      @0xabad1dea what has @catsalad been up to?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                        jennyfluff@chitter.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jennyfluff@chitter.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jennyfluff@chitter.xyz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #61

                        @0xabad1dea that makes more sense than the IPv8 one

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                          it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                          fedihacker@masto.esF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fedihacker@masto.esF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fedihacker@masto.es
                          wrote last edited by
                          #62

                          @0xabad1dea Meooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                            it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                            th@social.v.stT This user is from outside of this forum
                            th@social.v.stT This user is from outside of this forum
                            th@social.v.st
                            wrote last edited by
                            #63

                            @0xabad1dea reminds me of Doug Zonker's foundational academic paper "Chicken Chicken Chicken: Chicken Chicken". https://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf

                            Link Preview Image
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups