it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html
-
@nila @0xabad1dea the auth process is "if the IETF isn't interested, it doesn't proceed to the RFC stage", apparently.
You can't just post a standard, but you CAN just post a draft/proposal, which is what both this and "IPv8" are.
@nila @0xabad1dea as long as crawlers correctly interpret the draft as a draft and journos / wiki editors etc do their due diligence (which, i am told, they always do), there is no attack vector
-
@nila @0xabad1dea the auth process is "if the IETF isn't interested, it doesn't proceed to the RFC stage", apparently.
You can't just post a standard, but you CAN just post a draft/proposal, which is what both this and "IPv8" are.
@ratsnakegames @0xabad1dea Do you think an agent swarm led by an APT could social engineer its way into "the IETF"? Setting up web pages, blogs, arXiv submissions etc. for a network of sock puppets definitely seems within reach of such actors.
(And, come to think of it, any other standards body...)
-
it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html
Reminds me of Doug Zongker's publication:
http://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL_-1d9OSdk -
it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html
@0xabad1dea
Cat5e or Cat6 cable isn't good enough.
You need Cat9 cable, -
@hugo @slothrop I’m saying it’s a pointed political statement and not a random joke https://infosec.exchange/@0xabad1dea/116419619962656186
@0xabad1dea @slothrop

no worries next time I won’t reply unless to say something deep and serious which is probably once a year for me on Mastodon. You can ignore me.
Have a good day -
if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason
@0xabad1dea When I read the beginning of IPv8 I thought it was an April 1st one.
-
it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html
@0xabad1dea I think the somebody in question is @mat ?
-
@0xabad1dea I think the somebody in question is @mat ?
-
it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html
@0xabad1dea throwing in an obligatory shoutout to @mat for being the ietf kitty. cats deserve credit
-
it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html
@0xabad1dea
Okay, this is cool, my #cat would likely benefit from this. Does anyone know if there's someone already implementing this? -
it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html
@0xabad1dea what has @catsalad been up to?
-
it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html
@0xabad1dea that makes more sense than the IPv8 one
-
it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html
@0xabad1dea Meooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
-
it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html
@0xabad1dea reminds me of Doug Zonker's foundational academic paper "Chicken Chicken Chicken: Chicken Chicken". https://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf
