Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
63 Posts 50 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR ratsnakegames@mastodon.social

    @nila @0xabad1dea the auth process is "if the IETF isn't interested, it doesn't proceed to the RFC stage", apparently.

    You can't just post a standard, but you CAN just post a draft/proposal, which is what both this and "IPv8" are.

    ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    ratsnakegames@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #50

    @nila @0xabad1dea as long as crawlers correctly interpret the draft as a draft and journos / wiki editors etc do their due diligence (which, i am told, they always do), there is no attack vector

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR ratsnakegames@mastodon.social

      @nila @0xabad1dea the auth process is "if the IETF isn't interested, it doesn't proceed to the RFC stage", apparently.

      You can't just post a standard, but you CAN just post a draft/proposal, which is what both this and "IPv8" are.

      nila@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
      nila@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
      nila@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #51

      @ratsnakegames @0xabad1dea Do you think an agent swarm led by an APT could social engineer its way into "the IETF"? Setting up web pages, blogs, arXiv submissions etc. for a network of sock puppets definitely seems within reach of such actors.

      (And, come to think of it, any other standards body...)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

        thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        thelancashireman@hostux.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        thelancashireman@hostux.social
        wrote last edited by
        #52

        @0xabad1dea

        Reminds me of Doug Zongker's publication:
        http://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL_-1d9OSdk

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

          it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
          wrote last edited by
          #53

          @0xabad1dea
          Cat5e or Cat6 cable isn't good enough.
          You need Cat9 cable,

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

            @hugo @slothrop I’m saying it’s a pointed political statement and not a random joke https://infosec.exchange/@0xabad1dea/116419619962656186

            hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
            hugo@someone.elses.computerH This user is from outside of this forum
            hugo@someone.elses.computer
            wrote last edited by
            #54

            @0xabad1dea @slothrop 👌🏻 no worries next time I won’t reply unless to say something deep and serious which is probably once a year for me on Mastodon. You can ignore me.
            Have a good day

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

              if you have no idea what this is about: a very official-looking "IPv8" draft appeared that was an absolute fever dream of and-a-pony wishlist features for a censorious regime, down to using json web tokens at the hardware level for some reason

              gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
              gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
              gudenau@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #55

              @0xabad1dea When I read the beginning of IPv8 I thought it was an April 1st one.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                orb2069@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
                orb2069@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
                orb2069@mastodon.online
                wrote last edited by
                #56

                @0xabad1dea I think the somebody in question is @mat ?

                0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • orb2069@mastodon.onlineO orb2069@mastodon.online

                  @0xabad1dea I think the somebody in question is @mat ?

                  0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                  0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                  0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #57

                  @Orb2069 @mat thank you, I didn't realize there was an official announcement post on mastodon for it

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                    it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                    eblu@wetdry.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                    eblu@wetdry.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                    eblu@wetdry.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #58

                    @0xabad1dea throwing in an obligatory shoutout to @mat for being the ietf kitty. cats deserve credit

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                      it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                      shadowdancer@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      shadowdancer@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      shadowdancer@mstdn.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #59

                      @0xabad1dea
                      Okay, this is cool, my #cat would likely benefit from this. Does anyone know if there's someone already implementing this?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                        it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        blogdiva@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #60

                        @0xabad1dea what has @catsalad been up to?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                          it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                          jennyfluff@chitter.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jennyfluff@chitter.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jennyfluff@chitter.xyz
                          wrote last edited by
                          #61

                          @0xabad1dea that makes more sense than the IPv8 one

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                            it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                            fedihacker@masto.esF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fedihacker@masto.esF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fedihacker@masto.es
                            wrote last edited by
                            #62

                            @0xabad1dea Meooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange0 0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange

                              it seems someone decided to prove you really can just publish any nonsense protocol draft with the IETF https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html

                              th@social.v.stT This user is from outside of this forum
                              th@social.v.stT This user is from outside of this forum
                              th@social.v.st
                              wrote last edited by
                              #63

                              @0xabad1dea reminds me of Doug Zonker's foundational academic paper "Chicken Chicken Chicken: Chicken Chicken". https://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf

                              Link Preview Image
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups